Akeyless Secrets Management vs Checkmarx One comparison

Akeyless and Checkmarx are both solutions in the AI Security category. Akeyless is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.8, while Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Akeyless holds a 0.5% mindshare in AAS, compared to Checkmarx’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Akeyless users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Checkmarx users who would recommend it.

Akeyless Secrets Management

Read 4 Akeyless Secrets Management reviews

1,364 Views
600 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

24,992 Views
1,999 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Akeyless Secrets Management

Checkmarx One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Akeyless Secrets Management and Checkmarx One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two AI Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Akeyless Secrets Management vs. Checkmarx One Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akeyless Secrets Management vs. Checkmarx One

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akeyless Secrets Management

Ranking in AI Security

18th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Password Managers (14th), Secrets Management Tools (5th)

Checkmarx One

Ranking in AI Security

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Vulnerability Management (15th), Container Security (14th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (4th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (11th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the AI Security category, the mindshare of Akeyless Secrets Management is 0.5%. The mindshare of Checkmarx One is 1.5%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	1.5%
Akeyless Secrets Management	0.5%
Other	98.0%

AI Security

Featured Reviews

DeepakReddy

Sr.Devops engineer at Scaler

Centralized secret management has improved multi-cloud security and automated key rotation

I sometimes feel that there are documentation gaps in Akeyless Secrets Management. The documentation could be more detailed for advanced integrations and troubleshooting. Some organizations feel that there is a trust concern because the secrets are stored in Akeyless Secrets Management and it is not open-sourced. It is completely closed-source. If something goes wrong or someone hacks Akeyless Secrets Management, there is a huge drawback. These are concerns my organization and many other organizations are facing. The UI/UX could be better on the homepage and many other pages. Pricing transparency should also be improved. The pricing should include discounted pricing for regular customers or regular enterprise customers.

Read full review

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Akeyless Secrets Management is a very good tool, and I have not used a better one than it."

"I would recommend others to use Akeyless Secrets Management; it is a brilliant security platform, very easy to use, and does exactly what it says it should."

"Akeyless Secrets Management has positively impacted my organization as it helped store our secrets in a right way, in a proper controlled way where you can view, update, and at the same time, it helps in updating the passwords very effectively in the cloud running environment."

"Akeyless Secrets Management stands out because it combines SaaS simplicity with a Zero-Knowledge cryptographic design, reducing operational overhead without fully sacrificing control."

"We were using HPE Security Fortify to scan code for security vulnerabilities, but it can scan only after a successful compile, and if the code has dependencies or build errors the scan fails, while with Checkmarx pre-compile scanning is seamless and allows us to scan more code."

"By using the automated testing in Checkmarx One, we have saved around one or two days in a full week of our team because we have a lot of code to do with seven markets."

"Checkmarx One has positively impacted my organization, especially in our CI/CD integration, where when we try to build any feature, they are always scanned by Checkmarx before they get released."

"Even if there are multiple vulnerabilities in the source coding, Checkmarx is able to identify which lines need to be corrected and then proceeds to automatically remediate the situation."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the Best Fix Location and the Payments option because you can save a lot of time trying to mitigate the configuration. Using these tools can save you a lot of time."

"The report function is the solution's greatest asset."

"It can integrate very well with DAST solutions. So both of them are combined into an integrated solution for customers running application security."

"The user interface is modern and nice to use."

More Checkmarx One pros

Cons

"Akeyless Secrets Management platform could be improved with a more beginner-friendly interface."

"Some organizations feel that there is a trust concern because the secrets are stored in Akeyless Secrets Management and it is not open-sourced."

"They can support the remaining languages that are currently not supported. They can also create a different model that can identify zero-day attacks. They can work on different patterns to identify and detect zero-day vulnerability attacks."

"The product can be improved by continuing to expand the application languages and frameworks that can be scanned for vulnerabilities. This includes expanded coverage for mobile applications as well as open-source development tools."

"I would like to see the rate of false positives reduced."

"As the solution becomes more complex and feature rich, it takes more time to debug and resolve problems. Feature-wise, we have no complaints, but Checkmarx becomes harder to maintain as the product becomes more complex. When I talk to support, it takes them longer to fix the problem than it used to."

"The Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) feature should be better."

"The tool is currently quite static in terms of finding security vulnerabilities. It would be great if it was more dynamic and we had even more tools at our disposal to keep us safe. It would help if there was more scanning or if the process was more automated."

"We had to lock the number of CPUs used to not crash the Checkmarx Audit."

"Checkmarx could improve the REST APIs by including automation."

More Checkmarx One cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."

"I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."

"For around 250 users or committers, the cost is approximately $500,000."

"The tool's pricing is fine."

"Checkmarx is comparatively costlier than other products, which is why some of the customers feel reluctant to go for it, though performance-wise, Checkmarx can compete with other products."

"Its price is fair. It is in or around the right spot. Ultimately, if the price is wrong, customers won't commit, but they do tend to commit. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Pharma/Biotech Company

10%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Akeyless Secrets Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akeyless Secrets Management?

The main use case is to manage our secrets, to secure machine credentials, API keys, certificates or tokens, and SSH credentials and encryption keys. All of these are secured in hybrid and multi-cl...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akeyless Secrets Management?

The advice I will give to anyone looking into using Akeyless Secrets Management is to first evaluate what tool you need according to your organization's needs. Understand your organization's need a...

See all answers

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

Comparisons

Keeper Enterprise Password Manager vs Akeyless Secrets Management

Compared 17% of the time

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Akeyless Secrets Management

Compared 17% of the time

BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe vs Akeyless Secrets Management

Compared 15% of the time

HashiCorp Vault vs Akeyless Secrets Management

Compared 14% of the time

Azure Key Vault vs Akeyless Secrets Management

Compared 13% of the time

More Akeyless Secrets Management Competitors

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 30% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Password Managers

June 2026

Download Akeyless Secrets Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

June 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Overview

Akeyless Secrets Management enhances security for DevOps teams, centrally managing credentials, certificates, and keys across various environments with its cloud-native SaaS platform.

Utilizing patented Distributed Fragment Cryptography™, Akeyless Secrets Management enables organizations to strengthen security while simplifying operations. It provides centralized management for credentials across hybrid, multi-cloud, and legacy environments. The platform offers unified secrets management, certificate lifecycle management, and identity federation to reduce risks and meet compliance demands. With no hardware to manage, it issues ephemeral credentials directly into workflows, supporting both modern and legacy systems.

What are the key features of Akeyless Secrets Management?

Distributed Fragment Cryptography™: Enhances security with innovative cryptography.
Centralized Management: Controls credentials across various environments.
Unified Platform: Integrates secrets management, certificate lifecycle, and identity federation.
Ephemeral Credentials: Offers temporary credentials for streamlined workflows.
Compatibility: Supports modern and legacy systems.

What benefits and ROI can Akeyless Secrets Management deliver?

Reduced Operational Overhead: Minimizes the need for hardware management.
Strengthened Security: Zero-knowledge and quantum-resilient cryptography for future threats.
Cost Efficiency: Lowers costs with a cloud-native approach.
Compliance Support: Meets necessary security requirements.

Akeyless Secrets Management finds applications across industries, enabling businesses to securely manage credentials and secrets within hybrid and multi-cloud infrastructures. Its cloud-based nature offers flexibility for the financial sector, while government and healthcare benefit from its compliance features. Organizations across diverse fields leverage its capabilities to ensure secure and efficient credential management, addressing unique industry-specific challenges.

Akeyless

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

Sample Customers

Cimpress

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Buyer's Guide

Akeyless Secrets Management vs. Checkmarx One

June 2026

Free Report: Akeyless Secrets Management vs. Checkmarx One

Find out what your peers are saying about Akeyless Secrets Management vs. Checkmarx One and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akeyless Secrets Management vs. Checkmarx One report.

See our list of best AI Security vendors.

We monitor all AI Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.