Akeyless Secrets Management vs Checkmarx One comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Akeyless and Checkmarx are both solutions in the AI Security category. Akeyless is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.6, while Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Akeyless holds a 0.3% mindshare in AAS, compared to Checkmarx’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Akeyless users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Checkmarx users who would recommend it.

Akeyless Secrets Management

Read 6 Akeyless Secrets Management reviews

2,032 Views
955 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

30,538 Views
3,359 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Akeyless Secrets Management

Checkmarx One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Akeyless Secrets Management and Checkmarx One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two AI Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Akeyless Secrets Management vs. Checkmarx One Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akeyless Secrets Management vs. Checkmarx One

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akeyless Secrets Management

Ranking in AI Security

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Password Managers (12th), Secrets Management Tools (6th)

Checkmarx One

Ranking in AI Security

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Vulnerability Management (12th), Container Security (15th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (5th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (9th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the AI Security category, the mindshare of Akeyless Secrets Management is 0.3%. The mindshare of Checkmarx One is 1.1%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	1.1%
Akeyless Secrets Management	0.3%
Other	98.6%

AI Security

Featured Reviews

DeepakReddy

Sr.Devops engineer at Scaler

Centralized secret management has improved multi-cloud security and automated key rotation

I sometimes feel that there are documentation gaps in Akeyless Secrets Management. The documentation could be more detailed for advanced integrations and troubleshooting. Some organizations feel that there is a trust concern because the secrets are stored in Akeyless Secrets Management and it is not open-sourced. It is completely closed-source. If something goes wrong or someone hacks Akeyless Secrets Management, there is a huge drawback. These are concerns my organization and many other organizations are facing. The UI/UX could be better on the homepage and many other pages. Pricing transparency should also be improved. The pricing should include discounted pricing for regular customers or regular enterprise customers.

Read full review

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Akeyless Secrets Management has positively impacted our organization because it has improved security through simpler credential rotation policies."

"I would recommend others to use Akeyless Secrets Management; it is a brilliant security platform, very easy to use, and does exactly what it says it should."

"Akeyless Secrets Management stands out because it combines SaaS simplicity with a Zero-Knowledge cryptographic design, reducing operational overhead without fully sacrificing control."

"Akeyless Secrets Management has positively impacted my organization as it helped store our secrets in a right way, in a proper controlled way where you can view, update, and at the same time, it helps in updating the passwords very effectively in the cloud running environment."

"Akeyless Secrets Management is actually a nice tool because it also integrates zero-knowledge security and it is a JIT access which replaces the standing privileges and hardcoded credentials with identity-based ephemeral secrets generated exclusively at runtime, which is really amazing for us."

"Akeyless Secrets Management is a very good tool, and I have not used a better one than it."

"The process of remediating software security vulnerabilities can now be performed (ongoing) as portions of the application are being built in advance of being compiled."

"The most valuable feature of Checkmarx is the user interface, it is very easy to use, and we do not need to configure anything, we only have to scan to see the results."

"From my point of view, it is the best product on the market."

"Overall, we are very satisfied with Checkmarx and it is a product that I recommend."

"It is very easy to insert the tool in the SDLC because there are a wide variety of ways to access the source-code, initiate scans, and review the results."

"It is a stable product."

"Apart from software scanning, software composition scanning is valuable."

"It can integrate very well with DAST solutions. So both of them are combined into an integrated solution for customers running application security."

More Checkmarx One pros

Cons

"As a global organization, Akeyless Secrets Management needs to gain trust."

"Akeyless Secrets Management could be improved in several areas. The initial setup was quite difficult for me."

"Akeyless Secrets Management platform could be improved with a more beginner-friendly interface."

"Some organizations feel that there is a trust concern because the secrets are stored in Akeyless Secrets Management and it is not open-sourced."

"Checkmarx reports many false positives that we need to manually segregate and mark “Not exploitable”."

"Presently they support micro-services, but the supporting methodology of the micro-services is not good enough at the moment."

"Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context."

"I would like to see the tool’s pricing improved."

"Their licensing fees are rigid and this causes two main issues. One is a restriction in terms of scaling the product at an enterprise level."

"You can't use it in the continuous delivery pipeline because the scanning takes too much time."

"Checkmarx One is often down when the cloud provider experiences issues. A more fail-tolerant solution needs to be created."

"The interactive application security testing, or IAST, the interactive part where you're looking at an application that lives in a runtime environment on a server or virtual machine, needs improvement."

More Checkmarx One cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

"It's relatively expensive."

"The average deal size was usually anywhere between $120K to $175K on an annual basis, which could be divided across 12 months."

"The solution's price is high and you pay based on the number of users."

"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"The solution is costly."

"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

University

11%

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Akeyless Secrets Management?

Akeyless Secrets Management could be improved in several areas. The initial setup was quite difficult for me. The documentation and tutorials must include end-to-end examples for Kubernetes and CI/...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akeyless Secrets Management?

Akeyless Secrets Management is used to store secrets such as database credentials and TransUnion certificates for the production environment. For example, a team stores PostgreSQL usernames and pas...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akeyless Secrets Management?

The advice that I would personally give regarding Akeyless Secrets Management is that before adopting any secrets management platform, you should define what your security and compliance requiremen...

See all answers

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

Comparisons

1Password Business vs Akeyless Secrets Management

Compared 18% of the time

Keeper Enterprise Password Manager vs Akeyless Secrets Management

Compared 12% of the time

BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe vs Akeyless Secrets Management

Compared 11% of the time

Azure Key Vault vs Akeyless Secrets Management

Compared 10% of the time

HashiCorp Vault vs Akeyless Secrets Management

Compared 9% of the time

More Akeyless Secrets Management Competitors

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 22% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Snyk vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akeyless Secrets Management

October 2026

Download Akeyless Secrets Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

October 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Overview

Akeyless Secrets Management enhances security for DevOps teams, centrally managing credentials, certificates, and keys across various environments with its cloud-native SaaS platform.

Utilizing patented Distributed Fragment Cryptography™, Akeyless Secrets Management enables organizations to strengthen security while simplifying operations. It provides centralized management for credentials across hybrid, multi-cloud, and legacy environments. The platform offers unified secrets management, certificate lifecycle management, and identity federation to reduce risks and meet compliance demands. With no hardware to manage, it issues ephemeral credentials directly into workflows, supporting both modern and legacy systems.

What are the key features of Akeyless Secrets Management?

Distributed Fragment Cryptography™: Enhances security with innovative cryptography.
Centralized Management: Controls credentials across various environments.
Unified Platform: Integrates secrets management, certificate lifecycle, and identity federation.
Ephemeral Credentials: Offers temporary credentials for streamlined workflows.
Compatibility: Supports modern and legacy systems.

What benefits and ROI can Akeyless Secrets Management deliver?

Reduced Operational Overhead: Minimizes the need for hardware management.
Strengthened Security: Zero-knowledge and quantum-resilient cryptography for future threats.
Cost Efficiency: Lowers costs with a cloud-native approach.
Compliance Support: Meets necessary security requirements.

Akeyless Secrets Management finds applications across industries, enabling businesses to securely manage credentials and secrets within hybrid and multi-cloud infrastructures. Its cloud-based nature offers flexibility for the financial sector, while government and healthcare benefit from its compliance features. Organizations across diverse fields leverage its capabilities to ensure secure and efficient credential management, addressing unique industry-specific challenges.

Akeyless

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

Sample Customers

Cimpress

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Buyer's Guide

Akeyless Secrets Management vs. Checkmarx One

September 2026

Free Report: Akeyless Secrets Management vs. Checkmarx One

Find out what your peers are saying about Akeyless Secrets Management vs. Checkmarx One and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akeyless Secrets Management vs. Checkmarx One report.

See our list of best AI Security vendors.

We monitor all AI Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.