Akamai CloudTest vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

Akamai and Progress Software are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while Progress Software is ranked #12. Akamai holds a 3.7% mindshare in LTT, compared to Progress Software’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

1,100 Views
946 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

2,044 Views
429 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Akamai CloudTest and Telerik Test Studio are competing products in the field of software testing tools. Telerik Test Studio appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, although pricing and support are in favor of Akamai CloudTest.

Features: Akamai CloudTest provides real-time load testing, cloud-based performance analytics, and integration with AWS for scalable load agents. It allows users to generate load across multiple geographies with dynamic ramp-up capabilities. Telerik Test Studio integrates smoothly with development tools, supports diverse testing scenarios, and offers powerful test automation options with PDF validation and an intuitive user interface.

Room for Improvement: Akamai CloudTest could enhance its automation testing features, improve its user interface, and provide broader test scenario support. Telerik Test Studio might benefit from better cloud performance testing capabilities, optimization of real-time analytics, and integration with a wider range of third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai CloudTest is deployed in the cloud, promoting scalability and low latency with solid infrastructure support. Telerik Test Studio offers flexible deployment as a standalone or integrated solution, with a strong customer service system known for its effective support resources.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai CloudTest offers lower setup costs for enterprises focusing on large-scale testing, making it a cost-effective choice for high-volume scenarios. Telerik Test Studio, slightly more expensive, offers a substantial ROI with its extensive automation capabilities, which justify the investment for businesses seeking diverse testing solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. Telerik Test Studio

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (8th)

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (23rd), Regression Testing Tools (13th), Test Automation Tools (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 3.7%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 2.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Akamai CloudTest	3.7%
Telerik Test Studio	2.6%
Other	93.7%

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The agents on the cloud have been extremely valuable for us."

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"Soasta CloudTest is an integral part of our performance testing strategy and key in generating load across geography."

"This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic ramp-up to any levels of virtual users."

"The solution was easy to set-up and much more easy and intuitive to build performance tests."

"The solution is very stable."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

More Akamai CloudTest pros

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"The object repository is the most valuable feature, as different elements can be identified and reutilized through the repository across other scripts, and the product has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

Cons

"One of the challenges with Soasta is availability and quick access to their technical support documentation and on-call support."

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"I couldn't say, as I haven't used it outside the training or applied it to any project yet."

"Resource consumption also needs to be worked on. When we generate a thousand or two thousand concurrent users, we need to optimize the load generator resource utilization."

"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."

"The test clip should be more user-friendly."

"Out of five, I would rate the technical support of the solution at two or three. Sometimes it's a challenge because we face delays."

"If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement."

More Akamai CloudTest cons

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"We have not seen a return on investment yet."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"The first time I customized the solution, it was quite challenging."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Running cost is very low."

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Retailer

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

University

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Akamai CloudTest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai CloudTest?

I use the solution in my company for load testing. You can say that it is used on the API and then for web page-level load testing.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akamai CloudTest?

The tool's very first benefit is zero maintenance. You need not take care of your controller or load generator, so there is zero maintenance. The second benefit of the tool would be in the area of ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 21% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 9% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 5% of the time

k6 Open Source vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 4% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

May 2026

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2026

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

No data available

Overview

Akamai CloudTest provides a robust platform for simulating real-world traffic scenarios, allowing businesses to optimize application performance and reliability.

Akamai CloudTest is designed for high-scale load testing, enabling companies to simulate thousands to millions of users in realistic environments. It delivers accurate performance insights, ensuring applications handle peak demands. With its real-time analytics, teams can make informed decisions to improve app reliability and user experience.

What are the key features of Akamai CloudTest?

Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into performance metrics during tests.
Scalability: Simulates a range of user loads from thousands to millions.
Cloud Integration: Utilizes cloud resources for flexible and extensive testing.
Customizable Test Scenarios: Allows tailored load tests to reflect real-world conditions.
Integrated Monitoring: Offers comprehensive monitoring of application performance during load tests.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Improved Performance: Identifies performance bottlenecks swiftly, enhancing application speed and reliability.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resource allocation by preventing over-provisioning.
Informed Decisions: Empowers teams to make data-driven decisions based on real-time insights.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes application downtime through proactive testing and analysis.

In industries like finance, retail, and media, Akamai CloudTest is often implemented to ensure transaction-heavy environments remain stable under peak loads. Retailers use it during sales events to guarantee seamless user experiences, while media companies benefit during high-traffic streaming events.

Akamai

Telerik Test Studio empowers users with intuitive automation tools suitable for both novices and experts. Its standout features include robust element fetching and data parameterization, ensuring streamlined automation processes.

Telerik Test Studio is recognized for its powerful object repository which enhances element identification and reuse. Its user-friendly interface simplifies automation, even for newcomers. Integral features like record and play streamline repetitive tasks. The solution strengthens project outcomes with features like performance and load testing, PDF validation for detailed reports, and efficient data parameterization. Compatibility issues with load testing and validation challenges in Excel and Word are areas for improvement. Users require minimal coding effort for end-to-end testing with databases and document validation.

What are the key features of Telerik Test Studio?

Object Repository: Enhances element identification and reuse.
Record and Play: Facilitates task simplification.
Performance Testing: Offers impressive capabilities in load testing.
PDF Validation: Aids in testing detailed reports and documents.
Data Parameterization: Streamlines data management within tests.

What are the noteworthy benefits and ROI aspects?

Intuitive Interface: Welcomes users of all expertise levels.
Automation Efficiency: Simplifies script creation and testing procedures.
Reduced Coding: Minimizes code writing for end-to-end testing.
Performance Validation: Strengthens load and performance evaluations.

Industries like healthcare and HR have embraced Telerik Test Studio for automating UI and functional tests, with on-premises deployment for performance and automation testing. It supports load validation, script creation, and excels in PDF validations, enhancing compatibility with Microsoft tools for expanded future use.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. Telerik Test Studio

April 2026

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.