Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) comparison

Akamai and OpenText are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.9. Akamai holds a 3.1% mindshare in PTT, compared to OpenText’s 9.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

674 Views
573 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Performance E...

Read 45 OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) reviews

2,539 Views
2,107 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

OpenText Core Performance E...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Akamai CloudTest and OpenText Core Performance Engineering LoadRunner Cloud are competing products in performance testing. LoadRunner Cloud appears superior owing to its broad capabilities, offering a diverse testing environment despite its higher cost.

Features: Akamai CloudTest provides real-time analysis, excellent load generation across geographies, and dynamic ramp-up capabilities. LoadRunner Cloud supports multiple protocols, features advanced analytics, and allows integration with various applications and monitoring tools like JMeter and SiteScope.

Room for Improvement: Akamai CloudTest could benefit from simplification in setup and user interface enhancements. It may also improve by expanding integration capabilities and protocol support. LoadRunner Cloud can enhance user experience by refining its scripting methods and providing more automated solutions. It might also work on reducing licensing complexities and improving cost efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LoadRunner Cloud offers a smooth cloud-based deployment with robust customer support, making it more user-friendly. Akamai CloudTest, on the other hand, requires a more detailed setup, which can be initially complex.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai CloudTest has a lower initial cost, potentially delivering a quicker ROI. LoadRunner Cloud's higher investment is justified by its extensive feature set, providing a superior long-term value through comprehensive performance testing capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

8th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Core Performance E...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

5th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 3.1%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is 9.5%, up from 8.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)	9.5%
Akamai CloudTest	3.1%
Other	87.4%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

Jyoti Ranjan Behera

Performance Test Analyst at Sensata Technologies

User-friendly features facilitate monitoring while support could be more responsive

I am satisfied with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud as a product, but the ticket resolution time is concerning. The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations. Compared to previous support, I notice that while experts previously resolved issues immediately, current experts take more time to resolve issues, which is the main challenge we are facing. They are now lacking regional support, which takes more time than it used to. My suggestions for improvements to OpenText LoadRunner Cloud would be to have specific experts available who can resolve issues more quickly, as delays can impact project timelines significantly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic ramp-up to any levels of virtual users."

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

"The solution is very stable."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

"It is feature-rich. It supports most protocols, which is important because I am in charge of a team at the bank, and we do performance testing for all kinds of different applications. We have tons of them. We even do video streams."

"It's a fast product, so you don't have much trouble in terms of maintenance overhead. You don't want to just look into configuring load generators, look for upgrades, and end up having that take up a lot of your time. With this solution, you just log in and you start using it. This means that there is a huge benefit in terms of the overhead of maintaining the infrastructure and the maintenance effort."

"One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols."

"I rate OpenText LoadRunner Cloud ten out of ten."

"The TruClient feature is the most valuable for us. An application with testing can only be scripted using TruClient, so it's part web-based, but it also has its own protocol combined with HTTP and HTML. So many other tools do not recognize this specific proprietary protocol. Using TruClient, we can still create scripts that cover everything that we need to cover."

"Keeping up with DevOps, thus the best feature of StormRunner is that we don't have to build and maintain infrastructure anymore."

"The most valuable feature is having load generators in countries where we don’t have access to them."

"A vital feature of the solution is its ability to compose realistic scenarios for performance testing"

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pros

Cons

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release."

"The test clip should be more user-friendly."

"If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement."

"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."

"Sometimes, you are utilizing one of the low generators, then all of a sudden if you discontinue from one project, it actually deletes the entire low generator."

"I have faced several problems using the cloud in different locations, so I rate the stability a six out of ten."

"We did have some challenges with the initial implementation."

"Reporting and analysis need improvement. Compared to the old school LoadRunner Windows application, the reporting and analysis are mediocre in LoadRunner Cloud."

"I faced issues with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud support when a problem took three to four months to resolve, which negatively impacted our project, especially when key team members were unavailable during leave periods."

"Its scripting features need improvement."

"The support team provides delayed responses."

"Scriptless automation is an area that can be improved."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"Running cost is very low."

"The solution’s price is considerably high."

"We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000."

"LoadRunner always had expensive pricing. At my company, we used to evaluate LoadRunner, but we stuck with Silk Performer because its pricing was always better in the past. I do feel that I got a fair deal this time. Our value-added reseller and our sales guy worked hard to give us a fair deal. I feel that we got a fair deal. We did not go for the pay-as-you-go deal. I did an upfront package. I prefer that. I want to know what my costs are."

"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

"It is expensive compared to other tools."

"The solution is expensive."

"It's a very expensive solution"

"Pricing is dependent on what you're referring to. If you're talking about the cloud, it's likely competitive. However, if you're talking about the on-premise version, professional or enterprise licenses are required. Prices are on the high side. They are not cheap."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Retailer

11%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	29

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Akamai CloudTest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai CloudTest?

I use the solution in my company for load testing. You can say that it is used on the API and then for web page-level load testing.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akamai CloudTest?

The tool's very first benefit is zero maintenance. You need not take care of your controller or load generator, so there is zero maintenance. The second benefit of the tool would be in the area of ...

See all answers

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner. The hourly usage model allows cost-saving when used rightly.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 20% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 14% of the time

BlazeMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 11% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 22% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 15% of the time

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

January 2026

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

December 2025

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

Overview

Soasta's CloudTest rapidly builds realistic test scenarios using real user data, then tests, analyzes and repairs faster. CloudTest's visual test environment and real-time analytics test your website, mobile app and api backend to give you a streaming view of all your performance data while tests run from back-end systems to front end performance.

Akamai

OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.

OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.

What are the key features?

Rapid Test Setup: Quickly initiate performance tests without extensive configuration efforts.
Scalability: Supports numerous users without loss of performance across global regions.
Global Load Distribution: Allows effective load distribution across different geographies.
Seamless Tool Integration: Integrates smoothly with SiteScope, New Relic, and others.
Real-time Anomaly Detection: Instantly identifies performance anomalies for immediate action.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Minimal Infrastructure Management: Reduces the need for physical resources, saving costs and effort.
Enhanced Application Responsiveness: Ensures applications remain stable under peak loads.
Increased Testing Efficiency: Streamlines testing processes for faster execution.
Cloud-Based Flexibility: Offers dynamic resource allocation to accommodate varying test needs.
Comprehensive Performance Insights: Delivers valuable analytics for optimizing applications.

Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

December 2025

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.