We performed a comparison between Airlock and Imperva DDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."Our customers are more than satisfied with the user experience provided by the product."
"The three-second service level agreement is already better than the competition."
"Technical support provides good, quick responses."
"It's very pretty easy to onboard the URL."
"There is no need to have an appliance in house for the services because it is on the cloud."
"The technical support is excellent."
"Imperva Incapsula has many valuable features. One, it protects the top 10 OWAS vulnerability, the open web application software platform, this is standard. Secondly, it protects against broken authentication. As well, it has remote execution of code."
"We use Imperva DDoS to stop DDoS attacks and reduce the amount of unwanted queries against web services or web scraping."
"Scalability is pretty easy on the base platform. You just add another, and you're ready to go."
"The tool must be simplified."
"The cost could be lower; our end clients need to have a high budget to purchase this solution."
"Users would benefit from better documentation. There is official documentation, but sometimes we need more detail. We have some use cases that are not so run of the mill. It would be great if there was a knowledge base that we could go to for more answers."
"The solution needs to improve Integration with third parties for their on-prem deployment models. The integration is not that good yet."
"A limited tool if you're looking to customize."
"It would be beneficial to include vulnerability management in the solution, similar to what they have for their on-premise solution."
"The salespeople tend to exaggerate its capabilities, which can cost you money if you don't verify the information."
"The weakest point of Imperva is their first level of support, which should be improved. They should also improve the access and security logs viewing directly on the portal. I would like to see better access and security logs through the portal and not only through a SIM solution. Currently, if you want to explore your access and security logs from Imperva, you need a SIM tool or a SIM infrastructure on your side to do it. You can't do it manually or directly through the portal, which is a big problem for us. I had a call yesterday with Imperva for the roadmap, and I just told them this. They agreed that this is an improvement point from their side."
"Incapsula services also provides load balancing services for their service IP address environment. So far, with monitoring their services, the IP address was only changed once."
Airlock is ranked 22nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review while Imperva DDoS is ranked 16th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 74 reviews. Airlock is rated 10.0, while Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Airlock writes "Provides endless features and can be adapted to every single application that exists in the world". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". Airlock is most compared with AWS WAF, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Citrix Web App and API Protection and HUMAN BotGuard for Applications, whereas Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.