IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Airlock vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The pricing model is very straightforward compared to the competition. You just pay per month for the product and usage."
  • "We pay $210 per month for CloudFlare WAF."
  • More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    598,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Ranking
    Views
    395
    Comparisons
    320
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    2,558
    Comparisons
    1,999
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    566
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Airlock Suite
    Cloudflare WAF
    Learn More
    Overview

    The problem of internet security is almost as old as the internet itself. But there is a reliable solution: Airlock Suite from Ergon. Airlock Suite is underpinned by superb Swiss engineering expertise, many years of experience and well thought-out concepts that master the most complex challenges. Airlock Suite deals with the issues of filtering and authentication in one complete and coordinated solution - setting new standards for usability and services.

    Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's intuitive dashboard enables users to build powerful rules through easy clicks and also provides Terraform integration. Every request to the WAF is inspected against the rule engine and the threat intelligence curated from protecting over 27 Million websites. Suspicious requests can be blocked, challenged or logged as per the needs of the user while legitimate requests are routed to the destination, agnostic of whether it lives on-premise or in the cloud. Analytics and Cloudflare Logs enable visibility into actionable metrics for the user.

    Offer
    Learn more about Airlock
    Learn more about Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
    Sample Customers
    Raiffeisen, SGKB, Generali, Visana
    crunchbase, udacity, marketo, okcupid, zendesk
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Media Company12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider28%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Government6%
    Insurance Company5%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    May 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Microsoft, Amazon and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: May 2022.
    598,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Airlock is ranked 33rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is ranked 14th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews. Airlock is rated 0.0, while Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall writes "A SaaS solution that is API configurable and a convenient part of a suite but needs updating of core rules". Airlock is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Citrix Web App and API Protection, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and NGINX App Protect, whereas Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is most compared with Azure Front Door, AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Fastly and Akamai Kona Site Defender.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.