We performed a comparison between Airlock and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."Our customers are more than satisfied with the user experience provided by the product."
"The most valuable feature I found is iRules."
"The F5 GTM/BIGIP DNS (Global Traffic Manager) is a valuable feature. This feature allows for DNS load balancing, which means that high availability and load sharing can be done across services locally, as well as across datacenters with advanced capabilities."
"Load balancing generally brings high availability and a bigger ability to scale out. In some cases, it brings security, depending on how it is configured."
"We always use technical support and the team helps us very well. They're able to effectively find and fix issues and they respond very quickly."
"We have multiple solutions we can deploy through the F5."
"We like is how they integrate nicely with the Oracle PeopleSoft application."
"What we like best about this solution is its stability. It is extremely stable."
"it has TCP LAN and WAN optimization features. It has has caching."
"The tool must be simplified."
"The solution could improve the ease of use, the management could be simplified. Other solutions are easier to use."
"F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is expensive. Pricing needs to be improved."
"F5 BIG-IP LTM can improve on the SSL loading which includes the authentication of certificates. Although, most of these issues have been solved there are still some issue that persists."
"Based on my experience using F5 and by only taking into consideration the last seven years, I have found that the reporting mechanism is bad."
"LTM would be improved with the inclusion of signature-based blocking."
"I would like them to have more flexible models."
"The user experience for dashboards and reports can be improved. They should make dashboards and the reporting system easier for users. They need to add more reports to the dashboard. Currently, for complicated reports, I have to do the customization. It should have more integration with network firewalls to be able to gather all the information required for traffic management."
"Security enhancement should be more user friendly."
More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Airlock is ranked 28th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review while F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is ranked 1st in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 116 reviews. Airlock is rated 10.0, while F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Airlock writes "Provides endless features and can be adapted to every single application that exists in the world". On the other hand, the top reviewer of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) writes "Helps deliver applications to users in a reliable, secure, and optimized way". Airlock is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Citrix Web App and API Protection, HUMAN BotGuard for Applications and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is most compared with Citrix NetScaler, Fortinet FortiADC, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, NGINX Plus and HAProxy.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.