No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Airlock Digital Application Control vs Ivanti Application Control [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 2, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Airlock Digital Application...
Ranking in Application Control
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ivanti Application Control ...
Ranking in Application Control
9th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Control category, the mindshare of Airlock Digital Application Control is 9.5%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Application Control [EOL] is 6.7%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Control Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Airlock Digital Application Control9.5%
Ivanti Application Control6.7%
Other83.8%
Application Control
 

Featured Reviews

MB
Business Development Manager at Digitaltrack
Application allow listing has strengthened endpoint security and streamlines software approvals
Airlock Digital Application Control is a solid product, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. The biggest challenge is the ongoing effort required to maintain allow listing policies in the environment where applications are updated frequently. While the initial deployment can be planned carefully, keeping policies current as vendors release new versions requires regular attention, and that can become time-consuming for IT teams managing a large number of endpoints. I would appreciate seeing more automation around approving trusted software updates and better integrations with common software deployment and vulnerability management tools to reduce manual effort. Reporting is another area that could be enhanced, particularly with more customizable dashboards and easier ways to generate compliance and operational reports for different audiences. From an administration perspective, some troubleshooting workflows could be more intuitive, especially when identifying why an application was blocked or determining the exact policy responsible for the decision. These limitations have not been significant enough to outweigh the benefits of the product, but addressing them would make day-to-day management more efficient, reduce administrative overhead, and improve the overall experience for security and endpoint management teams. One additional area for improvement is the overall user and administration experience. While the platform is functional, I think some of the management workflows could be simplified so that common tasks such as reviewing blocked applications, approving legitimate software, or tracing the reason behind a policy decision require fewer steps. For organizations with lean IT teams, a more intuitive interface and clearer guidance during policy creation would help reduce the learning curve for new administrators. I would appreciate seeing broader integrations with the endpoint management, SIEM, and IT service management platforms so application events, approval requests, and policy updates can fit more naturally into existing operational workflows. Better APIs and pre-built integrations would reduce manual work and make automation easier for larger environments. More flexible reporting and customizable dashboards would help different teams, whether security operations or compliance, quickly access the information that is most relevant to them without having to manually compile reports. Addressing these areas would improve efficiency and make the product easier to operate as organizations scale their endpoint environments.
Use Ivanti Application Control [EOL]?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Control solutions are best for your needs.
918,169 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
38%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise13
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Airlock Digital Application Control?
One area for improvement would be making application discovery and policy creation more intelligent and streamlined. There can be many legitimate applications and frequent software changes, so iden...
What is your primary use case for Airlock Digital Application Control?
As a Cyber Security Analyst, my primary use case for Airlock Digital Application Control is controlling application executions across the endpoints and servers. I use it to enforce allow-listing po...
What advice do you have for others considering Airlock Digital Application Control?
I would recommend starting with a clear list of applications, endpoints, and business requirements before deployment. Run a proper pilot first and then use monitoring in audit mode to understand wh...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Sealed Air, Toshiba, Mills & Reeve
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatLocker, Check Point Software Technologies, Airlock Digital and others in Application Control. Updated: October 2026.
918,169 professionals have used our research since 2012.