

WatchGuard Firebox and Airlock Digital Application Control are competing in network security and endpoint protection. Airlock displays strength in application control, but WatchGuard offers competitive pricing and support benefits.
Features: WatchGuard Firebox stands out with advanced network security, intrusion prevention, and streamlined threat management. In contrast, Airlock Digital Application Control is focused on application whitelisting, firm policy enforcement, and protective measures against unauthorized applications.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WatchGuard Firebox provides various deployment options and extensive support resources, making the setup process straightforward. In comparison, Airlock Digital requires deeper involvement in setup but offers detailed guidance and expert support, emphasizing precision.
Pricing and ROI: WatchGuard Firebox is notable for its competitive pricing and favorable ROI, aided by included features and strong support. Airlock Digital, while involving higher upfront costs, convinces with precise threat prevention features leading to a strong ROI for security-specific needs.
We estimated that support tickets related to unauthorized software decreased by around thirty-five to forty percent, and the time spent investigating suspicious or unknown executables was reduced from several hours to less than thirty minutes because administrators could quickly verify application status through centralized policies and audit records.
The return on investment is that in five years, we have never had a breach or a malware event that has been a result of Airlock Digital Application Control.
I would say Airlock Digital Application Control saves around thirty percent of our time.
From a security standpoint, preventing even a single major security incident or prolonged outage can represent significant cost savings.
I do not see any return on investment after WatchGuard Firebox implementation in terms of cost reductions.
Reduced incidents and easier management helped lower operational cost.
When you speak and share the problem you are facing, you can troubleshoot things much faster than via chat or email.
The technical support of Airlock Digital Application Control receives a rating of 10 because only a few cases were opened and they were handled perfectly.
I would rate the customer support for Airlock Digital Application Control ten out of ten because it helped us considerably.
On a scale of one to 10, I would rate the technical support of the WatchGuard Firebox a 10.
When comparing WatchGuard Firebox with other vendors such as Fortinet, SonicWall, Palo Alto, and Sophos, WatchGuard Firebox performs competitively.
Most of the time, support engineers are knowledgeable and able to assist effectively with firewall configuration issues, VPN troubleshooting, firmware updates, and security-related concerns.
Successful scalability depends not only on the product itself but also on having well-defined governance and policy management processes in place.
It supports centralized policy management, easy onboarding of new devices, and consistent application control enforcement across diverse environments.
I find Airlock Digital Application Control very scalable.
Overall, WatchGuard Firebox offers strong scalability for SMBs, MSPs, branch offices, and hybrid environments while keeping deployment and management relatively straightforward.
The user interface and features compared to newer firewalls are not up to the mark, which includes functionalities such as filtering, web filtering, threat protection, user identity, and UTM features that need improvement.
You can choose different models based on throughput and features, which makes it easy to support growing environments.
After they rolled out 5.2.2, these issues were completely resolved.
Any stability issues we have experienced are the result of us blocking the wrong application, which is not the product's fault because it works as advertised.
The stability of Airlock Digital Application Control has been excellent, and I rate it a 10.
I have just one WatchGuard Firebox unit that is licensed, and I have no bugs on it, so I am happy with that.
Once properly configured, the platform handles VPN connectivity, traffic inspection, and security services constantly, even in multi-site environments with remote users.
There are issues with traffic hitting the firewall, which could indicate performance problems related to throughput.
I think more guides on how to onboard and bring Airlock Digital Application Control into production would be helpful; these aren’t technical needs, more around documentation and potentially some videos on how to onboard or how to bring it into your organization more efficiently.
Simpler policy creation for large or complex environments is needed in Airlock Digital Application Control.
Some of the vulnerabilities that are meant for CVEs specific to Airlock Digital Application Control need to be addressed in newer versions.
It gives good visibility and control over the traffic, and the UI makes it easy to manage policies and respond quickly when something comes up.
Some improvements in threat intelligence integrations and SIEM integration as an out-of-the-box context would be beneficial.
The cost for renewal after three years is 75% of the hardware cost, which is a significant problem.
It is a good quality product that always works, and I do not think it is overpriced in any way.
The initial setup cost was reasonable because the deployment did not require significant additional infrastructure beyond what we already had in place.
Pricing and setup cost for Airlock Digital Application Control are very low.
When we tried to renew the Palo Alto license, the cost was beyond any reasonable range.
Fortinet is more expensive than WatchGuard.
I find WatchGuard Firebox to be cost-effective.
With Airlock Digital Application Control, we have proper governance in place because by default, everything is blocked. We follow the policy of zero trust. Anything which is not known is completely blocked.
When whitelisting something, it applies immediately over the network.
The policy change history feature helps us improve our auditability and governance over policies by allowing us to report to our auditors if they have any questions about how we use it and what we do with it.
The Firebox offers valuable features such as network security, URL filtering, UTM features, intrusion prevention and detection, and authentication.
The features of WatchGuard Firebox are most valuable for maintaining network security.
Some of the best features of WatchGuard Firebox in my experience are its ease of management, strong VPN capabilities, and integrated security services.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Airlock Digital Application Control | 10.1% |
| WatchGuard Firebox | 10.7% |
| Other | 79.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 104 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 30 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
Airlock Digital Application Control provides centralized policy management, aligning with compliance needs while enforcing approved software execution and enhancing cybersecurity posture.
Airlock Digital Application Control offers robust application control through centralized policy management, ensuring seamless upgrades and no downtime. It integrates with InTune for app pre-approval and operates swiftly across network subnets. Primarily used for managing endpoint and server controls, it meets compliance with New South Wales Essential Eight. It provides audit visibility and governance, emphasizing software discipline by allowing only authorized applications to run.
What features does Airlock Digital Application Control offer?Airlock Digital Application Control supports diverse industries by managing endpoint controls, policy design, and fine-tuning business requirements to ensure minimal disruption. Security teams strengthen application control strategies across approximately 1,000 servers, with DevOps utilizing the REST API feature to tailor applications to specific needs. There is a global demand for enhanced resilience against zero-day exploits and improvements in policy control and program update detection.
WatchGuard Firebox is a high-performance firewall known for its ease of setup, offering robust security with layered protection and centralized management capabilities.
WatchGuard Firebox stands out for its intuitive management and high throughput, addressing security needs with features like VPN, web filtering, and threat detection. Its centralized control and reporting abilities, along with Active Directory integration, make it popular among varied organizations. Its user-friendly interface and ongoing updates enhance usability and reliability. However, there's a call for better cloud-based administration, scalability, and improved integration with third-party vendors.
What are the key features of WatchGuard Firebox?WatchGuard Firebox is implemented across industries to secure internet gateways and protect data in multi-site businesses. Its applications span from Unified Threat Management (UTM) and intrusion prevention to compliance support in business environments requiring secure connectivity through VPNs.
We monitor all Application Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.