No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle ...
Ranking in Contract Management Software
4th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Conga Contract Lifecycle Ma...
Ranking in Contract Management Software
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Product Configuration and Quoting (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Contract Management Software category, the mindshare of Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) is 6.2%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is 3.9%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Contract Management Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)3.9%
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)6.2%
Other89.9%
Contract Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

it_user658929 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Analyst at a tech vendor
Email reminders notify relevant individuals and departments that contracts are due to be renewed or have expired.
Safe Horizon has successfully implemented the Agiloft Contract Management System as tailored to meet the specific needs of our organization’s contract approval and renewal workflow. The flexibility and relative ease of implementing functionality and modifications without programming has proven to be most striking. We were pleased by the functionality and smooth integration between Agiloft and DocuSign. The handoff of documents from Agiloft to DocuSign and back again to Agiloft is easy and seamless. The capability of being able to sign internal documents, as well as those requiring both internal and outside vendor signatures without necessitating a great deal of setup can help facilitate the contract completion process.
Sakshi Thakur - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Automation has transformed complex contract lifecycles and now supports high-volume workflows
The only drawback of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is that it does not work for small-scale business areas because I have implemented it for one customer with four or five pages of templates and three to four record types. For that small business, Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) does not work well because it is a bit complicated. Sometimes all customers need is a click of a button to go in and do things, and Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is a bit complicated for such kinds of businesses. There are definitely areas where Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) could be easier to use for smaller businesses, particularly making processes more streamlined and user-friendly.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Safe Horizon has successfully implemented the Agiloft Contract Management System as tailored to meet the specific needs of our organization’s contract approval and renewal workflow."
"Project HOME has easily recovered its initial capital outlay in the first year from simple centralization and automated approval tracking."
"We have been working with Agiloft Contract Management Suite for the past 6 months and have found it an extremely useful and user friendly solution to our contract management challenge."
"It is obvious to me that Agiloft can handle much more than contract management, as the specific requirements that were not part of Agiloft's initial configuration were implemented seamlessly."
"The main benefits I have seen from using Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) are that we use it as a discount platform in a huge project for different customers or accounts across the world."
"By using Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM), the time it takes to manage a contract, from contract creation to signature, is significantly reduced."
"Because of these processes, the customer can send out thousands of contracts in one go instead of creating them and having a lot of people appointed to do this job, and it is a one-person job now."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has a very positive impact on our organization, especially in terms of efficiency and visibility."
 

Cons

"If there is an area for improvement, it would be in the mobile aspect."
"One area of improvement I would suggest Agiloft to focus on would be how users interact with attachments to records."
"One possible area of improvement would be reporting."
"One challenge is the initial setup and configuration, especially for complex workflows and approval hierarchies."
"The only drawback of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is that it does not work for small-scale business areas because I have implemented it for one customer with four or five pages of templates and three to four record types."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has too much customization, making it not that easy to scale it up and scale it out."
"Sometimes their support is not very efficient."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Contract Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
10%
University
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
From my experience, the pricing and licensing for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) feel more in line with an enterprise-level investment. It is not the cheapest solution, but it aligns wit...
What needs improvement with Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
Regarding what I would improve in Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM), from my technical understanding, there is improvement criteria everywhere, but currently, we can achieve whatever we wan...
What is your primary use case for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
In our current project, we use Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) as a pricing model, and it is quite effective. It is helpful for us, similar to CPQ, as it redirects pricing to the CPQ from...
 

Also Known As

Agiloft Contract Management Suite
The Apttus Intelligent Cloud, Conga CLM AI
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Contract Mgmt: WeWork, Chevron, CSFI, Retrophin, Roche Diagnostics, Genentech, Global Healthcare Exchange, Fitch Ratings, Safehorizon, American Greetings, Doosan, Family Impact Network, Peloton Therapeutics, San Mateo County, Insmed, Roman Catholic Diocese of Dallas, Kaiser Permanente
Akamai Technologies, Axis Stars, BlackBaud, Cadence, Ceridian, Citrix
Find out what your peers are saying about Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.