ADOIT vs UNICOM System Architect comparison

BOC Group and Unicom Systems are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. BOC Group is ranked #10 with an average rating of 10.0, while Unicom Systems is ranked #24. BOC Group holds a 2.5% mindshare in AM, compared to Unicom Systems’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BOC Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Unicom Systems users who would recommend it.

ADOIT

Read 2 ADOIT reviews

847 Views
847 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UNICOM System Architect

Read 2 UNICOM System Architect reviews

377 Views
377 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

ADOIT

UNICOM System Architect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

UNICOM System Architect and ADOIT are competitors in the enterprise architecture domain. ADOIT often has an edge due to its comprehensive feature set, collaborative tools, and cloud-based deployment, which favors process improvement and collaboration.

Features: UNICOM System Architect features intuitive modeling tools, integration with enterprise systems, and reporting capabilities. ADOIT provides extensive process management, collaboration features, and advanced analytics, which differentiate it with strengths in collaboration and analytics that benefit stakeholder engagement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ADOIT offers cloud-based deployment, ensuring fast implementation and seamless updates, accompanied by responsive support and tailored training. UNICOM System Architect relies on traditional on-premises deployment, necessitating more resources and time, with dedicated support forums and thorough documentation, suiting companies with ample existing infrastructure.

Pricing and ROI: UNICOM System Architect generally has higher initial setup costs but delivers ROI through integration and modeling. ADOIT provides flexible subscription options, aiming for quick ROI by reducing deployment time and boosting collaboration. Its cost-effectiveness and rapid return make it appealing for organizations prioritizing budget and swift implementation.

To learn more, read our detailed ADOIT vs. UNICOM System Architect Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ADOIT vs. UNICOM System Architect

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ADOIT

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

10th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UNICOM System Architect

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

24th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of ADOIT is 2.5%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UNICOM System Architect is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ADOIT	2.5%
UNICOM System Architect	1.4%
Other	96.1%

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1289670

Solution Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

A good tool that's great for modelling and building heat maps

During the first 18 months, for at least three months, we tried to get some training. We started working on the modeling part and we are still evolving in this tool. There are a few recommendations that have been put to the vendor, and we've gotten some answers and the team is evolving the tool in this space. I don't have anything to complain about right now, although there are a few things that we are discussing with the team who is connecting with the vendor to get that resolved. Specifically, we need to understand how the data could be segregated. We need to know how the enterprise-level metadata and master data could be managed in this tool. There are multiple open questions.

Read full review

reviewer1261290

Project Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Useful for creating build-outs and architecture views, but requires a publisher add-on for some detailed reports

I don't use the tool or know a lot. It is going to have some shortcomings. When it comes down to publishing, we just found out this week that they actually have a publisher add-on. So, what we were trying to publish was not giving a detailed report about the architecture, views, etc. I just wish they had sent these to UNICOM and contacted them about add-on features for the publishing part of the tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool allows us to track the life cycle of products and resources. When the metadata is set up correctly, we can see where things are in their life cycle and how they fit into our processes. It helps us understand which core processes are active and whether any underlying elements need renewal. We can also keep tabs on the costs."

"It helps me to model the architecture at an enterprise level."

"It is useful for creating build-outs and architecture views and for publishing reports and stuff like that for different programs."

"It has good end-to-end metamodel interrelationships."

Cons

"We need to understand how the data could be segregated."

"The tool's data lineage could be enhanced. It would be great to see the data flow and understand where it's going within the system."

"They need to add reports that show the enterprise architecture perspectives, and the dashboards should be comfortable for the senior enterprise architects so that they can view the complete landscape."

"I don't use the tool or know a lot. It is going to have some shortcomings. When it comes down to publishing, we just found out this week that they actually have a publisher add-on. So, what we were trying to publish was not giving a detailed report about the architecture, views, etc. I just wish they had sent these to UNICOM and contacted them about add-on features for the publishing part of the tool."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use ADOIT's open-source version."

"I don't remember the price. It is a different cost for just buying it, and then you have a maintenance cost, which you need to renew every year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Government

Energy/Utilities Company

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ADOIT?

The tool's data lineage could be enhanced. It would be great to see the data flow and understand where it's going within the system.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ADOIT?

The solution describes the enterprise architecture for the company, encompassing everything from the business side to the technical aspects.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ADOIT?

The tool is still being integrated into our enterprise architecture. It serves as a tool for gathering and providing information, but it hasn't yet directly solved a critical business issue for me....

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

LeanIX vs ADOIT

Compared 25% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs ADOIT

Compared 20% of the time

Ardoq vs ADOIT

Compared 12% of the time

OrbusInfinity vs ADOIT

Compared 10% of the time

iServer vs ADOIT

Compared 9% of the time

More ADOIT Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs UNICOM System Architect

Compared 35% of the time

IBM Rational System Architect vs UNICOM System Architect

Compared 26% of the time

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs UNICOM System Architect

Compared 22% of the time

erwin Data Modeler vs UNICOM System Architect

Compared 16% of the time

More UNICOM System Architect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

January 2026

Download ADOIT product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

January 2026

Download UNICOM System Architect product report

Overview

ADOIT Enterprise Architecture suite is users' best-rated tool for deriving data-driven insights and architecture analysis, trusted by SMEs and large corporations worldwide. ADOIT helps you to take smart and fast decisions, manage digital portfolios, discover cross-functional dependencies and drive growth. ADOIT is intuitive, powerful, and flexible. It is the ultimate way to do EA. You can start building your outcome-driven EA initiative already today, as the cloud-based ADOIT:Community Edition is available for free. For more information please visit: www.boc-group.com/en/adoit

BOC Group

Information not available

Unicom Systems

Sample Customers

Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: Volksbank Vienna, Austrian Ministry of Finance, Hilti

Apple, Facebook, Google, HSBC, PayPal

Buyer's Guide

ADOIT vs. UNICOM System Architect

December 2025

Free Report: ADOIT vs. UNICOM System Architect

Find out what your peers are saying about ADOIT vs. UNICOM System Architect and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ADOIT vs. UNICOM System Architect report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.