Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Adobe Workfront vs LB GenieBelt comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Workfront
Ranking in Project Management Software
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
Digital Asset Management (2nd)
LB GenieBelt
Ranking in Project Management Software
72nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Adobe Workfront is 3.1%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LB GenieBelt is 0.1%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Project Management Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Adobe Workfront3.1%
LB GenieBelt0.1%
Other96.8%
Project Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

Deepa Soni - PeerSpot reviewer
Improved collaboration and efficiency through robust customization and reporting features
There are several features that could improve Adobe Workfront. Enhancing search functionality is important; we can optimize integrations and streamline workflows. Specific areas for improvement include expanding name search capabilities and enabling dual filtering for project type and owner. Improving the efficiency of converting issues to projects is also essential; when converting issues to projects, users should remain on the same page rather than being redirected. A success notification with a link to the new project would suffice. We can enhance integrations, such as ensuring Adobe Workfront integrates more seamlessly with other Adobe products like Experience Manager and Creative Cloud. Additionally, administrators should have easier ways to enable and disable email notifications with a simple on-off switch. To improve project performance, we can implement a clear design with larger titles, dividing lines, and immediate error messages for invalid numbers.
Use LB GenieBelt?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
866,088 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise28
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workfront?
Workfront incurs around a hundred thousand plus dollars per year. Licensing is strict, particularly with free accounts, however, it offers flexibility in project access, which could be enhanced fur...
What needs improvement with Workfront?
Integration with Azure DevOps could be improved to facilitate better communication between the two systems. The current report is not providing the expected side-by-side comparison of capabilities,...
What is your primary use case for Workfront?
For my team, we are using Adobe Workfront ( /products/adobe-workfront-reviews ) right now to support demand management, primarily. We also pull some high-level reports on status. From our perspecti...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

AtTask, Workfront DAM
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse
Downing Construction, Hplus, Juul & Nielsen General Contractors, Area Sq
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Asana, Microsoft and others in Project Management Software. Updated: August 2025.
866,088 professionals have used our research since 2012.