Acunetix vs Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Invicti Logo
4,960 views|3,762 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Trustwave Logo
views| comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Acunetix and Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"There is a lot of documentation on their website which makes setting it up and using it quite simple.""The scalability is good. The scalability is more than good because it can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated as part of applications. So that really makes it a very, very versatile solution to have.""Picks up weaknesses in our app setups.""It can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated with other applications, which makes it a very versatile solution to have.""The tool's most valuable feature is performance.""Their technical support has been very active. If I have an issue, I can reach out to them and get an answer pretty quick.""I haven't seen reporting of that level in any other tool.""It comes equipped with an internal applicator, which automatically identifies and addresses vulnerabilities within the program."

More Acunetix Pros →

"The stability is great. We haven't had any issues at all with it."

More Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"It would be nice to have a feature to "retest" only a single vulnerability that the customer reports as patched, and delete it from the next scans since it has already been patched.""There is room for improvement in website authentication because I've seen other products that can do it much better.""It should be easier to recreate something manually, with the manual tool, because Acunetix is an automatic tool. If it finds something, it should be easier to manually replicate it. Sometimes you don't get the raw data from the input and output, so that could be improved.""The solution can be improved by adding the ability to scan subdomains automatically, and by providing reports that can be exported to external databases to share with other solutions.""You can't actually change your password after you've set it unless you go back into the administration account and you change it there. Thus, if you're locked out and don't remember your password, that's a thing.""The jargon used makes it difficult for project managers to understand the issues, and the technical explanations used make it difficult for developers to understand issues. These things should be simplified much more. That would be very helpful for us when explaining to them what needs to be fixed. The report output needs to be simplified.""The pricing is a bit on the higher side.""There's a clear need for a reduction in pricing to make the service more accessible."

More Acunetix Cons →

"I would like to see a little more flexibility with regards to setting up profiles for vulnerabilities."

More Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."
  • "Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."
  • "The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."
  • "All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."
  • "The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."
  • "I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."
  • "The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."
  • "When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."
  • More Acunetix Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.
    Top Answer:There are some versions of the solution that are not as stable as others.
    Top Answer:We use the product for dynamic analysis. It also helps us to scan web applications.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    4,960
    Comparisons
    3,762
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    317
    Rating
    8.6
    Unranked
    In Application Security Tools
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AcuSensor
    Hailstorm, Cenzic Hailstorm
    Learn More
    Overview

    Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

    Provides ability to test applications for security vulnerabilities, security policies and regulatory compliance.
    Sample Customers
    Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand
    Leading Health Insurer
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Media Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise59%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Acunetix is ranked 16th in Application Security Tools with 26 reviews while Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Security Tools. Acunetix is rated 7.6, while Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Acunetix writes "Fantastic reporting features hindered by slow scanning ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] writes "It helps us troubleshoot failed scans and incomplete statuses". Acunetix is most compared with OWASP Zap, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, HCL AppScan and Fortify WebInspect, whereas Trustwave App Scanner [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.