Acunetix vs ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform comparison

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."

"Acunetix has an awesome crawler. It gives a referral site map of near targets and also goes really deep to find all the inputs without issues. This was valuable because it helped me find some files or directories, like web admin panels without authentication, which were hidden."

"By integrating with CI/CD tools, it enables a shift-left approach in the development process."

"We are able to create a report which shows the PCI DSS scoring and share it with the application teams. Then, they can correlate and see exactly what they need to fix, and why."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the speed at which it can scan multiple domains in just a few hours."

"I haven't seen reporting of that level in any other tool."

"One of the features that I feel is groundbreaking, that I would like to see expanded on, is the IAS feature: The Interactive Application Security Testing module that gets loaded onto an application on a server, for more in-depth, granular findings. I think that is really neat. I haven't seen a lot of competitors doing that."

"There is a lot of documentation on their website which makes setting it up and using it quite simple."

"The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic."

"You can't actually change your password after you've set it unless you go back into the administration account and you change it there. Thus, if you're locked out and don't remember your password, that's a thing."

"The solution's pricing could be better."

"When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic."

"The only problem that they have is the price. It is a bit expensive, and you cannot change the number of applications for the whole year."

"I had some issues with the JSON parameters where it found some strange vulnerabilities, but it didn't alert the person using it or me about these vulnerabilities, e.g., an error for SQL injection."

"While we do have it integrated with other solutions, it could still offer more integrations."

"There's a clear need for a reduction in pricing to make the service more accessible."

"I rate its stability six out of ten."

"The anomaly detection could be improved."

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."