Acunetix vs ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform comparison

"We use the solution for the scanning of vulnerabilities like SQL injections."

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."

"I haven't seen reporting of that level in any other tool."

"Acunetix has an awesome crawler. It gives a referral site map of near targets and also goes really deep to find all the inputs without issues. This was valuable because it helped me find some files or directories, like web admin panels without authentication, which were hidden."

"The solution is highly stable."

"By integrating with CI/CD tools, it enables a shift-left approach in the development process."

"Overall, it's a very good tool and a very good engine."

"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."

"The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic."

"It is difficult to create a proxy connection."

"There was an issue related to updates from the internet."

"There is room for improvement in website authentication because I've seen other products that can do it much better."

"The only problem that they have is the price. It is a bit expensive, and you cannot change the number of applications for the whole year."

"When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic."

"The jargon used makes it difficult for project managers to understand the issues, and the technical explanations used make it difficult for developers to understand issues. These things should be simplified much more. That would be very helpful for us when explaining to them what needs to be fixed. The report output needs to be simplified."

"Acunetix needs to include agent analysis."

"The solution limits the number of scans. It would be much better if we could have unlimited scans."

"The anomaly detection could be improved."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"The solution is expensive."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."