Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

ERPScan and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. ERPScan is ranked #50, while PortSwigger is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7. ERPScan holds a 0.1% mindshare in AS, compared to PortSwigger’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of PortSwigger users are willing to recommend the solution.
ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity...
Read 1 ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform review
  • 172 Views
  • 67 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...
Read 63 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews
  • 2,942 Views
  • 1,779 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity...
Ranking in Application Security Tools
50th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...
Ranking in Application Security Tools
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (5th), Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 2.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

TO
Good core scanning, a helpful GDPR assessment template and very good technical support
The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic. The last time we did it, the customer was trying to make the SAP system match the GDPR process. We were able to use it for that benchmark. It was very important. The GDPR assessment template that is being used in the process application benchmark and analyzing landscape came in very handy. It was very useful because it also gave notifications.
Read full review
Anuradha.Kapoor Kapoor - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers efficient scanning of entire websites but presence of false positive bugs, leading to time-consuming efforts in distinguishing real bugs from false alarms
We have found that so many times, false positive bugs are there, and then we spend a lot of time basically separating them from real bugs. So that's the reason we are looking for some other tool. So we were in discussion with Acunetix. Therefore, the false positive rate is, like, something that we would like to improve. What we are looking for is if this false positive rate goes down because we were OWASP Zap tool users, which was free anyway. But there were a lot of false positives there, and we used to spend a lot of time, like, for security reasons, reproducing those bugs for the development team to fix it. So then we thought, okay, why not we go with the tool? Even if it is not very expensive. But still, every year, we have to renew the license. And we got this tool. Again, we found that in this tool also, even if it is less, there are still a lot of false positive bugs out there. So we again have to spend so much time. So we hired a security tester, who was basically using Acunetix in his previous company for almost three years, and then you said that in that scanning is very slow. The scanning is also slow. Like, sometimes the site scan takes eight hours, six to eight hours. Yeah. And whereas in Acunetix, it took three to four hours. And plus, there are no false positives. I'm not saying none but there's very little. But here, the rate sometimes is very high. These are the two features I think we would like to improve further.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic."
"It was easy to learn."
"The solution is quite helpful for session management and configuration."
"It is useful for scanning and tracing activities."
"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is one of the best user-friendly solutions for getting the proxy set up."
"The product has a good learning hub."
"The extension that it provides with the community version for the skills mapping is excellent."
"The technical support from PortSwigger is excellent, managing response time and quality efficiently without any issues."
"The most valuable feature is Burp Collaborator."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros
 

Cons

"The anomaly detection could be improved."
"It would be beneficial to have privileged access management as a part of Burp Suite Professional."
"In the Professional version, we cannot link it with the CI/CD process."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"A lot of our interns find it difficult to get used to PortSwigger Burp's environment."
"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional could improve the static code review."
"The price could be better. The rest is fine."
"The use of system memory is an area that can be improved because it uses a lot."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It's a lower priced tool that we can rely on with good standard mechanisms."
"The platform's pricing is reasonable."
"They should reduce the license cost a little bit. It is $400 per user, and it would be better if they could reduce the licensing fee."
"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is an expensive solution."
"PortSwigger is a bit expensive."
"Burp Suite is affordable."
"For a country such as Sri Lanka, the pricing is not reasonable."
"Our licensing cost is approximately $400 USD per year."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?
OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...
See all answers
What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?
The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?
I find the price of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional to be very cost-efficient.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 18% of the time
Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 14% of the time
OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 10% of the time
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 8% of the time
HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 6% of the time
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
June 2025
ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform reportDownload ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
May 2025
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reportDownload PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Burp
 

Overview

ERPScan’s primary mission is to bridge the gap between technical and business security, and provide solutions to evaluate and secure SAP and Oracle ERP systems and business-critical applications from both, cyber-attacks as well as internal fraud.

ERPScan

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

PortSwigger
 

Sample Customers

Wired
Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
June 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.