ActiveBatch by Redwood vs AppWorx Workload Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jul 12, 2023

We performed a comparison between ActiveBatch Workload Automation and AppWorx Workload Automation based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

Features: ActiveBatch Workload Automation offers a versatile and user-friendly interface with prebuilt jobs and streamlined batch processing. It also provides process automation, PowerShell and VBScript features, and real-time job scheduling and monitoring. The automation is scalable and intelligent, and it has REST API adapters and native integrations. AppWorx Workload Automation focuses on simplicity and reliable performance. It has a user-friendly interface and is specifically designed for running nightly jobs and conducting calculations and processes during nighttime hours.

ActiveBatch Workload Automation could benefit from improvements in managed file transfer, transitioning to a subscription model, incorporating cloud aspects, enhancing the user interface, enhancing cloud platform capabilities, integrating with DevOps, improving beginner-friendliness, optimizing the help center, streamlining software setup, refining email alerts, addressing lag/stability issues, expanding customization options, and enhancing customer support. Users of AppWorx Workload Automation are seeking improvements in API integration, better integration with other tools, and enhanced scalability.

Service and Support: ActiveBatch Workload Automation has been commended for its excellent customer service, characterized by dependable technical support. Nevertheless, there are concerns regarding the service model and availability of the hotline. AppWorx Workload Automation has garnered praise for its outstanding customer support.

Ease of Deployment: The setup process for ActiveBatch Workload Automation is straightforward and uncomplicated, with no significant challenges encountered. However, there is a slight requirement for additional documentation when importing files. The setup for AppWorx Workload Automation is relatively simple, although it may seem intricate to individuals who are unfamiliar with the system. It necessitates the involvement and access of an administrator.

Pricing: Based on user feedback, ActiveBatch Workload Automation is favored over AppWorx Workload Automation for its lower initial investment requirement. Users have reported cost-effectiveness and affordability as key advantages of ActiveBatch.

ROI: ActiveBatch Workload Automation has received positive feedback from users regarding its effectiveness and financial advantages. Users have reported substantial growth in net revenue. There is a lack of information regarding the return on investment for AppWorx Workload Automation.

Comparison Results: ActiveBatch is the preferred product. ActiveBatch offers a simpler setup process, versatile and user-friendly features, excellent scheduling and monitoring capabilities, and a highly regarded alerting mechanism. It also provides scalability, intelligent automation, and seamless integration with various systems.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. AppWorx Workload Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"For developers, it is easy to orchestrate the workflows and the integration has been very easy.""The REST API adapters and native integrations for integrating and orchestrating the software stack are very flexible.""Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBatch, the process is automated and it runs tasks on a scheduled basis.""As far as centralization goes it's nice because we can see all these processes that are tied to this larger process. The commissions, FTP processing, the reporting, the file moves to the business users — all that is right there. It's very easy to read. It's easy to tie it together, visually, and see where each of these steps fits into the bigger picture.""We are able to integrate it into multiple third-party tools like email, backup, tracking systems, SharePoint, Slack alerts, etc.""Error Handling is one of the best standout features of ActiveBatch.""The product offers a centralized platform for managing activities across many environments, applications, etc.""From a scheduling point of view, it is pretty good."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Pros →

"We have a lot of nightly jobs that need to be run. Therefore, we perform a lot of calculations and processes during nighttime hours.""The solution is very user friendly so anyone can use it.""Scheduling is a good feature.""The interface is good.""The most valuable features of AppWorx Workload Automation are simplicity and reliability. Additionally, they recently transformed the UI which is better.""The automated solution is the most valuable piece. Otherwise, we would have to be doing everything manually on every server.""It is really a robust product.""It is an object-based approach to task and process design in conjunction with conditional logic and event-based scheduling actions, which enables a build once/use often design methodology to be employed."

More AppWorx Workload Automation Pros →

Cons
"A nice thing to have would be the ability to comfortably pass variables from one job to another. That was one of the things that I found difficult.""Except for the GUI, everything looks good.""The monitoring dashboard could have been more user-friendly so that in the monitoring dashboard itself we can see the total number of jobs created in the system and how many were currently active/scheduled/chained.""One thing I've noticed is that navigation can be difficult unless you are familiar with the structure that we have in place. If someone else had to look at our ActiveBatch console and find a job, they might not know where to find it.""Any product is going to have some room for improvement, no matter what. I see the company has already ventured into AWS and they're constantly trying to improve the managed file transfer which they have recently improvised. I think they bought a software called JSCAPE and they're trying to improve it, which is good. I am not sure if JSCAPE would be part of the base product but currently, you have to buy a separate license for it, which doesn't make sense. If it was Microsoft, ServiceNow, or integrating with other software vendors, I would understand but JSCAPE is now in-house and I'm not sure if they can justify having a separate license for JSCAPE. I would probably expect them to be packaging JSCAPE into the base product. They did switch over from a perpetual license model to a subscription model, which hurt the company a little bit. Nobody is offering the perpetual model anymore. As long as the transition is fair for both the companies, I think it should be fine and not burn us out.""Some improvements can be made to the user interface.""The interface is not that user-friendly and is a little tough to navigate.""There is this back and forth, where ActiveBatch says, "Your Oracle people should be dealing with this," and Oracle people say, "No, we don't know anything about ActiveBatch." Then, it all falls back on me as to what happens. Nobody is taking responsibility. This is the biggest failing for ActiveBatch."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Cons →

"The compliance features are limited to the server and not the entire infrastructure.""As a general process automation and integration tool, it has been superseded by other offerings, notably the Workload Automation suite.""It is not really scaling per say because they are not putting much into it. They are trying to push their new product.""The graphical interface is pretty cool but not the best so it could use some improvement.""The scalability could improve.""The internal security model can be complex when configuring multiple user groups.""We are looking for additional features that would allow us to call APIs and integrate the product with other tools more effectively.""It is difficult to integrate with the Active Directory (AD)."

More AppWorx Workload Automation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."
  • "I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."
  • "It allows for lower operational overhead."
  • "Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."
  • "ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."
  • "The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."
  • "I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."
  • "If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."
  • More ActiveBatch by Redwood Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Licensing options are fairly straightforward."
  • "We are satisfied with the pricing."
  • "The price for annual licenses is a bit expensive so pricing is rated a two out of ten."
  • "The cost model is based on the number of orchestrated systems used."
  • More AppWorx Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBatch, the process is automated and it runs tasks on a scheduled basis.
    Top Answer:I'd advise users to start by knowing what the actual requirement is and thoroughly assess the automation needs. New users should take advantage of the demos and trial versions so they get an idea of… more »
    Top Answer:After upgrades we are facing a few issues and errors triggered, so focusing on this would be appreciated. Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referring… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of AppWorx Workload Automation are simplicity and reliability. Additionally, they recently transformed the UI which is better.
    Top Answer:The cost model is based on the number of orchestrated systems used.
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 49 in Workload Automation
    Views
    2,778
    Comparisons
    922
    Reviews
    23
    Average Words per Review
    658
    Rating
    9.3
    17th
    out of 49 in Workload Automation
    Views
    1,172
    Comparisons
    717
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    300
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ActiveBatch
    CA Automic Applications Manager
    Learn More
    Overview

    Orchestrate your entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation and Enterprise Job Scheduling. Build and centralize end-to-end workflows under a single pane of glass. Seamlessly manage systems, applications, and services across your organization. Eliminate manual workflows with ActiveBatch so you can focus on higher value activities that drive your company forward.

    Limitless Endpoints: Use native integrations and our low-code REST API adapter to connect to any server, any application, any service.

    Proactive Support Model: 24/7- US-based support and predictive diagnostics.

    Low Code Drag-and-Drop GUI: Easily build reliable, customizable, end-to-end processes.

    AppWorx Workload Automation automates your Ellucian’s Banner or Fiserv DNA processing. This innovative, best-in-class task scheduling solution accelerates your processing, provides visibility and control over business processes, and mitigates risk in both environments.

    AppWorx Workload Automation Can:

    • Automate banner processes without writing scripts
    • Automate testing
    • Document process flows and procedures
    • Maintain a history and audit trail of production runs
    • Automate migration from development to test to production environments
    • Reduce training
    • Eliminate human errors associated with manual tasks

    Benefits of AppWorx Workload Automation For Your Ellucian’s Banner

    • Automate recurring business processes, such as administration and record-keeping, while complying with state and federal reporting requirements.
    • Batch jobs are processed accurately.
    • If there are any inconsistencies or job failures, Automic for Banner immediately sends email notifications to the appropriate personnel.
    • Significantly improve your return on investment.
    • Automating batch processing and report generation.
    • Eliminating server overload by using a combination of features (AppWorx provides queues to control the number of jobs that can be submitted to a server at any given time, can spot duplicate runs of the same reports, and can delay impromptu reports submitted by individuals until all regularly scheduled reports are processed, etc.).
    • Eliminates the need for developers to write shell, PERL, or batch scripts to automate scheduling.
    • Automatically keeps a history of every job run, the parameters that were used, and the output generated at each step. These records are readily available for viewing online and can be printed for reference.
    • Export and import utilities make migration an error-free, repeatable process. Database logins, printers, and libraries can be mapped when you are moving process flows to a new environment. Mapping eliminates potentially erroneous code changes.

    Benefits of AppWorx Workload Automation For Your Fiserv DNA Processing

    • Run DNA jobs directly, eliminating the need to copy and release queues for each batch cycle.
    • Automatically run DNA jobs at the optimum time using sophisticated scheduling.
    • Run multiple DNA jobs at the same time in parallel from one batch station.
    • Eliminate potential data entry errors by automatically retrieving parameters from your enterprise databases.
    • Automatically check the results from one step to ensure data integrity before continuing to the next step.
    • Alert production analysts to problems the instant they occur.
    • Coordinate processing steps across all software applications.
    • Automatically distribute output files to vendors.
    • Perform all operations from one GUI client.

    Reviews from Real Users

    “The most valuable feature for me is the scheduling,” says an enterprise application architect at a retailer who has been using the solution for close to 10 years.

    A manager at a tech services company adds that “The interface is good. The compliance-related features are very good.”


    Sample Customers
    Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital
    Sandvik, Hanwha Life
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Insurance Company21%
    Computer Software Company21%
    Printing Company8%
    Logistics Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Insurance Company8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    University10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. AppWorx Workload Automation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. AppWorx Workload Automation and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked 4th in Workload Automation with 35 reviews while AppWorx Workload Automation is ranked 17th in Workload Automation with 7 reviews. ActiveBatch by Redwood is rated 9.2, while AppWorx Workload Automation is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ActiveBatch by Redwood writes "Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AppWorx Workload Automation writes "The scheduling tool and finance module are valuable features". ActiveBatch by Redwood is most compared with Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation, Tidal by Redwood, Redwood RunMyJobs and VisualCron, whereas AppWorx Workload Automation is most compared with Automic Workload Automation, Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation, Automic Automation Intelligence and Stonebranch. See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. AppWorx Workload Automation report.

    See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.