Acronis Cyber Protect vs Druva inSync comparison

Acronis Cyber Protect and Druva inSync are both players in the data protection market, tailored for different needs. Acronis Cyber Protect stands out for its strong backup and cyber protection features, making it a versatile option across varied environments. In contrast, Druva inSync excels in cloud-native endpoint backup with robust collaboration tools.

Features: Acronis Cyber Protect offers robust backup capabilities, universal restore features, and extensive cyber protection. It supports physical, virtual, and cloud environments, providing flexibility in deployment. Druva inSync provides strong cloud integration, focusing on endpoint backup and offering notable features like data governance and collaboration tools.

Room for Improvement: Acronis Cyber Protect could enhance integration with databases and simplify its user interface while reducing complexity during setup. Some users report the need for a more modern interface. Druva inSync might address issues with high pricing, which may impede adoption among smaller businesses. Improving system performance during backups could also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acronis Cyber Protect supports diverse deployment options, including on-premises and hybrid cloud environments. Customer feedback highlights mixed experiences with technical support and response times. Druva inSync, tailored for cloud-only deployments, simplifies deployment but lacks on-premises options. While it’s praised for user-friendliness, support response times have faced criticism.

Pricing and ROI: Acronis Cyber Protect offers various licensing structures appealing to different business sizes, balancing cost with feature sets, though some configurations are higher-priced. Druva inSync presents a straightforward licensing model yet is perceived as costly, particularly for SMEs. Despite price concerns, both solutions deliver positive ROI by minimizing data loss risks and facilitating rapid recovery.