We performed a comparison between AccessData FTK [EOL] and Nuix eDiscovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery."All of the features are most valuable because we're able to recover hard disks."
"In my industry, it is important to use this solution because it can handle a large pipeline."
"I think processing could be better. It really takes a lot of space, and it's very expensive to deploy."
"My past experience with the Nuix eDiscovery platform showed it was clunky when reviewing individual files and viewing folder structures. I wondered why we had to process in Nuix eDiscovery and then transfer to another review platform, this was a waste of time. I wish Nuix eDiscovery would have a comprehensive review platform in-house. I heard they have improved in this area, but our firm hasn't invested in it. Integrating the processing and review would make for a fantastic solution."
Earn 20 points
AccessData FTK [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery while Nuix eDiscovery is ranked 5th in eDiscovery with 1 review. AccessData FTK [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Nuix eDiscovery is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AccessData FTK [EOL] writes "A user-friendly forensic toolkit with many valuable features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nuix eDiscovery writes "Straightforward installation, good support, and suitable for large pipelines". AccessData FTK [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Nuix eDiscovery is most compared with IPRO, OpenText EnCase eDiscovery, Brainspace Discovery, LAW PreDiscovery and kCura Relativity.
See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.
We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
