AccessData FTK [EOL] vs OpenText EnCase eDiscovery comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Exterro Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
549 views|431 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AccessData FTK [EOL] and OpenText EnCase eDiscovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"All of the features are most valuable because we're able to recover hard disks."

More AccessData FTK [EOL] Pros →

"I like the processing feature on the product because it does everything at once, i.e, indexing, recovery, keyword searches, etc.""The technical support is excellent.""The solution is very stable.""The most important feature we've found is the Enscripts. That is one powerful feature that I, personally, love to use.""It indexes much faster, and is more reflexive because of the Enscripts.""Data Recovery: Its ability to repair damaged partitions and uncover hidden partitions from within the tool, and allow further analysis.""It speeds up the process, so I can meet my deadlines."

More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Pros →

Cons
"I think processing could be better. It really takes a lot of space, and it's very expensive to deploy."

More AccessData FTK [EOL] Cons →

"The reporting is a bit unreliable. It needs to be better.""I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function.""We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email.""In the past, incident response time for tech support was slow.""Ease of use and learning curve need improvement.""There were minor UI bugs.""​Sometimes the application can take more time to complete the image processing or fail at the end of the process.​"

More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AccessData FTK is too expensive compared to EnCase."
  • More AccessData FTK [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "​The product is affordable and user-friendly.​"
  • "EnCase is an affordable solution."
  • "We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
  • "We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
  • More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:We have experience in engineering and capital projects. It is an add-on to extend project and asset management documentation.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In eDiscovery
    6th
    out of 40 in eDiscovery
    Views
    549
    Comparisons
    431
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    343
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AccessData Forensic Toolkit
    EnCase eDiscovery
    Learn More
    Overview

    FTK is built for speed, stability and ease of use. It provides comprehensive processing and indexing up front, so filtering and searching is faster than with any other product. This means you can zero in on the relevant evidence quickly, dramatically increasing your analysis speed.

    eDiscovery collection tools address the rise in dispersed and remote workforces, the proliferation of mobile devices and new sources of data. Comprehensively collecting data across all data sources, including endpoints, such as desktops and laptops, is critical to defensibility. Collection analytics and culling is key to efficient digital investigations, narrowing the document collection to drive down the cost of legal review.

    With OpenText™ EnCase™ eDiscovery, organizations can streamline the collection, culling and preservation of data across diverse sources in a single efficient process.

    Sample Customers
    Royal Military Police
    Ontario Ministry of Government, Aerospace Company, Chesterfield Police Department
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Legal Firm7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    eDiscovery
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AccessData FTK [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery while OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is ranked 6th in eDiscovery with 8 reviews. AccessData FTK [EOL] is rated 8.0, while OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of AccessData FTK [EOL] writes "A user-friendly forensic toolkit with many valuable features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText EnCase eDiscovery writes "A stable and scalable hybrid solution with easy setup". AccessData FTK [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is most compared with Nuix eDiscovery, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and Microsoft Purview eDiscovery.

    See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

    We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.