We performed a comparison between 4me and JIRA Service Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The multi-tenancy architecture, both in terms of functionality and reporting, is the best feature. It is a really well-thought, designed, and developed part of this product."
"It offers a comprehensive set of features without requiring additional payments for each feature."
"I like their request management as well as their project management."
"We get software developed faster."
"The most valuable feature of JIRA Service Management is a plugin we are using for the front end for simple user forms."
"I like the precise ticket management capabilities. JIRA Service Management is easy to use as well."
"The links between the help desk and Jira issues and between Confluence and Jira issues are most valuable. I can write requirements in Confluence and link them to user stories in Jira and test cases. I can see my test coverage and all that kind of stuff. The integration between these three is very useful. It is pretty customizable, and it integrates well. There are a lot of add-ins and a lot of connectors to third-party products. In my last company, we used Test Royal for managing all the tests, and it integrated perfectly with that. For any issue or bug, we could see what tests have been run and the complete history of the tests."
"The flow of the reports is good."
"One of the main advantages of JIRA is that it can be customized for our solutions. I live in Iran and we translated some parts of it into Persian and customized it with extra features. We hid other features to customize it right to the point. We provide this solution for our customers."
"Jira lets us customize the workflow to meet our requirements. The email and alert features are also handy."
"The dashboards in Jira have been the most useful feature."
"We're still biased towards our previous, more mature product. 4me still needs to reach that level of maturity."
"One area where I believe there's room for improvement in the 4me system is the absence of an asset discovery tool."
"We would like to be able to customize and brand the solution, or at least the majority of its features and dashboards, particularly those that will be used by a large number of people."
"The interface could always be updated and improved."
"I'd like to update the dashboard so that more features are available."
"The solution needs to be integrated better with Office X5."
"Its UI is a bit overwhelming for new users. That has been the problem with Jira for a long time. If they could put some fields that we could use to simplify the UI, it would be good."
"JIRA Service could benefit from improvements to its voice support."
"The initial setup is very complex."
"Include a split configuration in a layer part to allow cloud services to have almost full admin rights in SaaS."
"A lot of users have said that they want a feature that was on the on-prem version of Jira and the vendor can't deliver. They're either unwilling or unable to give feature parity."
4me is ranked 20th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 3 reviews while JIRA Service Management is ranked 2nd in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 73 reviews. 4me is rated 8.0, while JIRA Service Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of 4me writes "Reasonably priced, easy integration, and workflow automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JIRA Service Management writes "Customizable, stable, and integrates well". 4me is most compared with ServiceNow, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus and Zendesk, whereas JIRA Service Management is most compared with ServiceNow, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, BMC Helix ITSM, Freshdesk and PagerDuty Operations Cloud. See our 4me vs. JIRA Service Management report.
See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.
We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.