Check Point DDoS Protector Reviews

Check Point DDoS Protector is considered expensive, though cheaper than solutions like Palo Alto and Cisco, but more costly compared to Fortinet. It includes a hardware license with additional purchasable options such as SSL. Users recommend having a specialized partner for guidance and utilizing manufacturer documentation for implementation. While some find the pricing straightforward, others note the necessity of basic support to update the DDoS database.

• "I don't deal with the pricing, but it seems that you need to get basic support in order to upgrade the DDoS database for new attacks and so on."
• "The appliance comes with a loaded hardware license, and additional options such as SSL can be purchased and enabled."
• "It's an expensive solution. It's one of the most expensive solutions in the world. It's cheaper than Palo Alto and Cisco but these are expensive solutions. Fortinet is cheaper."

Companies primarily use Check Point DDoS Protector to safeguard network perimeters and ensure service availability against DDoS attacks. It effectively mitigates volumetric, low, and slow attacks across layers three to seven, integrating with scrubbing centers and enhancing DNS traffic knowledge. Organizations benefit from its ability to block traffic based on geolocation and its robust protection against modern threats, ensuring both on-premise and cloud infrastructure security for continuous business operations.

Check Point DDoS Protector support receives mixed feedback. Some users praise the efficient response, particularly with premium options offering quick replies. Others report dissatisfaction, highlighting delays when Check Point and Radware collaborate on issues. Certain users express frustration with needing Radware for resolution, suggesting Check Point lacks expertise. Many users have not needed support frequently, yet express issues with the slower responses affecting their rating. Some access vendor assistance through local partners, with varying satisfaction levels.

Users reported mixed experiences with Check Point DDoS Protector's setup. Some found it straightforward and supported by excellent assistance, requiring an understanding of hosted services. Others found it challenging and recommended using professional services, citing an initial installation phase and weeks of traffic learning. Deployment duration varied, with some taking months for information gathering and others completing in hours, but all noted learning traffic behavior as a critical and time-consuming process.

Check Point DDoS Protector is described as scalable, accommodating multiple devices in parallel setups effectively. Users found it suitable for growing organizations, noting easy improvements or resizing. One perspective highlighted the importance of selecting hardware with future growth in mind. The device is frequently installed in high availability configurations and includes an auto pass-through feature for fiber connections, receiving positive feedback for its scalability features.

Check Point DDoS Protector is praised for its excellent stability by numerous users, experiencing no downtime or performance failures. Although version 6.14 faced challenges in differentiating traffic during large-scale attacks, leading to overload, version 8 successfully resolved these issues, enhancing security and performance. Many users report that it consistently maintains security and reliability, with their experiences highlighting its dependable nature.