Top 10 Check Point CloudGuard WAF Alternatives

Vendor: Check Point Software Technologies

4.4 out of 5

46 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top Check Point CloudGuard WAF Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Check Point CloudGuard WAF based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), Checkmarx One, and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF surpasses its competitors by delivering advanced threat prevention capabilities, seamless integration with cloud services, and automated threat intelligence, ensuring robust, real-time protection and reducing the complexity of web application security management.

Check Point Software Technologies Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Check Point Software Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

4.0 out of 5

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

4.0 out of 5

SonarQube is favored for its comprehensive language support and customizability, aiding development efficiency. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF excels in advanced threat prevention, appealing to security-focused organizations demanding robust application protection. Both offer unique benefits suited for varying business needs.

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report

Pricing

SonarQube Server is praised for its lower initial setup costs, whereas Check Point CloudGuard WAF tends to have a higher setup cost, making SonarQube more appealing to budget-conscious users.

View comparison

Pricing

SonarQube Server is praised for its lower initial setup costs, whereas Check Point CloudGuard WAF tends to have a higher setup cost, making SonarQube more appealing to budget-conscious users.

Checkmarx One

3.8 out of 5

Checkmarx One

3.8 out of 5

Checkmarx One appeals with flexibility and customer support alongside comprehensive vulnerability detection. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF is chosen for advanced security features and automated threat prevention. Tech buyers may prefer Checkmarx for budget-friendly flexibility or Check Point for robust protection.

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One Report

Pricing

Checkmarx One offers a cost-effective setup with minimal initial expenses, whereas Check Point CloudGuard WAF incurs higher setup costs, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Checkmarx One offers a cost-effective setup with minimal initial expenses, whereas Check Point CloudGuard WAF incurs higher setup costs, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.6 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.6 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway excels in integration within Azure, offering auto-scaling and SSL termination. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides advanced security features like threat prevention and bot protection. Buyers may choose Azure for cost-effectiveness and integration or opt for CloudGuard for superior security.

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs compared to Check Point CloudGuard WAF, which presents a more complex setup process. Differences in setup complexity may influence cost considerations between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Azure Front Door

4.4 out of 5

Azure Front Door

4.4 out of 5

Azure Front Door excels in seamless Azure integration with network traffic inspection and flexible policy assignments. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides superior security through IPS and AI-driven protection. Buyers might choose Front Door for cost-effectiveness or CloudGuard for advanced security features.

Download Azure Front Door vs. Check Point CloudGuard WAF Report

Pricing

Azure Front Door setup cost is competitive, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF involves higher initial expenses, highlighting a significant pricing difference.

View comparison

Pricing

Azure Front Door setup cost is competitive, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF involves higher initial expenses, highlighting a significant pricing difference.

AWS WAF

4.0 out of 5

AWS WAF

4.0 out of 5

AWS WAF offers cloud-native integration, automation, and scalability within the AWS ecosystem. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides advanced security features like intrusion prevention and AI-driven analytics, ideal for comprehensive threat detection and prevention with API integration.

Download AWS WAF vs. Check Point CloudGuard WAF Report

Pricing

AWS WAF offers a straightforward setup with lower costs, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF involves higher setup costs but provides additional features and tailored support, highlighting a trade-off between cost-effectiveness and enhanced functionality.

View comparison

Pricing

F5 Advanced WAF

4.3 out of 5

F5 Advanced WAF

4.3 out of 5

F5 Advanced WAF offers extensive security features with superior threat intelligence and highly adaptable integrations. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF excels in seamless cloud deployment and competitive pricing, providing strong AI insights and efficient threat protection for diverse environments.

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. F5 Advanced WAF Report

Pricing

F5 Advanced WAF is known for a moderate setup cost, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF typically incurs higher initial expenses. The primary distinction lies in their initial financial commitment, with Check Point often demanding a larger upfront investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiWeb

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiWeb

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiWeb excels with high throughput and diverse deployment options, making it suited for large enterprises. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers seamless API integration and advanced bot prevention, ideal for cloud environments. Both provide competitive pricing with considerations for feature differences.

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Fortinet FortiWeb Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiWeb requires a significant initial investment, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers a more budget-friendly setup cost.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiWeb requires a significant initial investment, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers a more budget-friendly setup cost.

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

4.2 out of 5

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

4.2 out of 5

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall offers ease of deployment and competitive pricing, appealing to businesses prioritizing scalability and straightforward setup. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides advanced threat prevention and customization, ideal for enterprises with complex security needs, despite higher costs.

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Report

Pricing

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall involves minimal setup costs, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF requires a substantial initial investment. Despite this, CloudGuard offers robust customization benefits that Cloudflare may not provide.

View comparison

Pricing

Imperva Web Application Firewall

4.3 out of 5

Imperva Web Application Firewall

4.3 out of 5

Imperva Web Application Firewall provides customizable configurations and security features like DDoS protection. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers automated security and API integrations with machine learning capabilities, appealing to buyers seeking robust threat management and modern threat prevention.

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Imperva Web Application Firewall Report

Pricing

Imperva Web Application Firewall has a higher setup cost, whereas Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers a more cost-effective initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Imperva Web Application Firewall has a higher setup cost, whereas Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers a more cost-effective initial setup.

Radware Cloud WAF Service

4.4 out of 5

Radware Cloud WAF Service

4.4 out of 5

Radware Cloud WAF Service excels with user-friendly analytics and easy integration, ideal for finance sectors needing competitive pricing. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF, recognized for AI-driven security and comprehensive threat prevention, appeals to those prioritizing advanced security capabilities over cost.

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report

Pricing

Radware Cloud WAF Service has a higher setup cost compared to Check Point CloudGuard WAF, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Radware Cloud WAF Service has a higher setup cost compared to Check Point CloudGuard WAF, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.

Show 1 more products

Related categories

Application Security Tools

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)