Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Logo

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation pros and cons

Vendor: Broadcom
4.0 out of 5
821 followers
Post review
 

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Pros review quotes

it_user779229 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 26, 2017
I would say our headwind, or our time to market, is reduced considerably. We get more consistent results out of it, because you write one time and once it's automated you expect it to behave the same way every time. And it cut down a lot of re-work for us.
it_user727497 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 29, 2017
Deployment workflow (WF) can be designed this way, so that it is not necessary to provide all applications (systems) artifacts of which an application consists.
it_user779319 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 26, 2017
Gives people insight into what's happening during the deployment.
Learn what your peers think about Automic Continuous Delivery Automation. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2024.
789,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user519528 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 26, 2017
I think on a day-to-day basis, it has increased the capacity to deploy. We don't have to wait for someone to do something.
MJ
Jun 28, 2018
The main benefit is you can deploy everything with it.
MD
Jun 28, 2018
It can support very complex environments and dependencies.
FB
Jun 28, 2018
The product provides efficiency, in terms time, cost, and resources.
RG
Apr 18, 2020
The event monitor is very good. You can monitor when the file is created so you can pick up the file once it's done.
MD
Jun 5, 2021
You can design your workflows for your needs.
ME
Jul 15, 2018
It is an umbrella system that allows us to integrate many different systems into our heterogeneous environment.
 

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Cons review quotes

it_user779229 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 26, 2017
One of the biggest features I've been asked by my team to put in there is opening more scripting languages to be part of the platform. There is a little bit of a learning curve in learning how to code some of the workflows in Automic at this time. If widely used languages like Perl and Python were integrated, on top of what's already there, the proprietary language, it would make it easier to on-board new resources.
it_user727497 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 29, 2017
GUI for mobile phones: Availability to approve and start deployment through mobile phones.
it_user779319 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 26, 2017
I would like to see more support for WebSphere.
Learn what your peers think about Automic Continuous Delivery Automation. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2024.
789,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user519528 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 26, 2017
key thing is support for cloud-based deployment. That is lacking.
MJ
Jun 28, 2018
There is an issue with the stability in the tool. The process of agent will stop, then the monitoring agent can't be recognized because the process is running, but you can talk with the system.
MD
Jun 28, 2018
At the moment, the version that we are using (version 12.0), the environment is complex with multiple installations. Therefore, the monitoring is not scalable, but this should be improved in 12.1 and 12.2.
FB
Jun 28, 2018
The dashboard should allow you to see the current state of packages in each environment, not only on an individual application basis, but across the entire application platform.
RG
Apr 18, 2020
There needs to be better error handling and error descriptions. It should be more clear what the errors are and what we can do to fix them.
MD
Jun 5, 2021
The stability of the solution can be improved.
ME
Jul 15, 2018
It would be very beneficial for us to see integrations into cloud environments, especially into the Google Cloud environment because we are heading towards cloud.