Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] vs GitLab comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and GitLab are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Additionally, 86% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of GitLab users who would recommend it.

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Read 13 Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

GitLab

Read 93 GitLab reviews

27,699 Views
9,972 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Automic Continuous Delivery...

GitLab

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] and GitLab based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Release Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitLab

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (9th), Build Automation (3rd), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (6th), Rapid Application Development Software (15th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (6th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Featured Reviews

reviewer895359

Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Automatic installation for complex deployments and environments, with good workflow support

I like that really complex deployments are possible with it. It's very good. You have everything you need. You can design your workflows for your needs. You can do so much more, it's not just an automatic installation tool. It's a real deployment tool. I can do the complete deployment with everything that is possible.

Read full review

BasilJiji

System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Role-based workflows have transformed daily deployments and improve team collaboration

GitLab has role-based access control, so when a team member needs to make a code change, they cannot directly apply it to the environment but must put in a merge request. Once a senior reviews the code and approves it, then it is implemented across the environment, making it safer and allowing everyone to experience the process. The best features GitLab offers are version control and automation, which are the major things that stand out to me. When it comes to access, the login is very smooth, with just one login integrated with our Okta, allowing everyone to log in easily. Deployments become much easier, and that is how GitLab helps. The automation features make my work easier because we use a tool called AWX, which is connected to GitLab. Whenever we run a job on AWX, it directly checks the code and uses it. Since the code is not preserved locally but kept in the cloud, it is safe and nobody can tamper with it. When it comes to safety, that is a major thing. Automation features allow the code to be accessed from any tools we use, so the jobs we run are helping tremendously and doing their work perfectly. For pipeline tasks, we have created a significant amount of pipelines, which are all hosted in GitLab. Running the pipelines has become much easier, and they are doing a perfect job, helping tremendously in our day-to-day activities. GitLab has positively impacted my organization because previously we stored code locally on servers, leading to many risks. Since GitLab came into our environment, our integration and deployments became much easier, helping our work become much smoother. Improvements from GitLab have led to better team collaboration because when several people are working, they can all edit the code and submit it as a merge request, and once approved, it reflects directly to the main branch. Many can work at the same time. When it comes to deployments, deploying has become much faster since we started using GitLab, and even if errors occur, we can spot them easily and troubleshoot, which has helped tremendously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It can support very complex environments and dependencies."

"In first pilot run, we achieved five times faster deployment without human work."

"It is a very stable solution and we can rely on pressing a button to perform a full-stack automatic installation that reliably finishes in eight hours instead of a problematic three-week manual installation."

"The event monitor is very good. You can monitor when the file is created so you can pick up the file once it's done."

"I like that really complex deployments are possible with it."

"The measurement and the display functions make it easy to report all the statuses up to management, and it has helped our customers with their time, costs, and resources."

"We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."

"The agents are one of the solution's most valuable features, and I like agents for file transfers so you can transfer the files from agent to agent on the different platforms."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] pros

"The most valuable aspects of GitLab are the ability to create branches, merge branches, and compare branches to resolve code conflicts."

"The stability is good."

"The CI/CD pipeline with Helm has significantly improved deployment speed and efficiency."

"GitLab's best features are maintenance, branch integration, and development infrastructure."

"GitLab's source control is excellent."

"In our software development lifecycle, GitLab is used as a component for code repository management. We use GitLab for several projects to handle code repositories. For other software projects, we use Bitbucket, but the use case for both is very similar."

"The most valuable features of Gitlab are integration with CIE and the ability to rapidly deploy solutions, projects, and applications. It is very easy to use, and there are no complaints."

"A user friendly solution."

More GitLab pros

Cons

"The dashboard should allow you to see the current state of packages in each environment, not only on an individual application basis, but across the entire application platform."

"It would be very beneficial for us to see integrations into cloud environments, especially into the Google Cloud environment because we are heading towards cloud."

"There are some bugs. For example, during the design of a workflow, important information is lost, it vanishes."

"If you have a technical problem and need development of the tool, the support team is terrible, because they cannot help with the technical details."

"I would like to see more support for WebSphere."

"One of the biggest features I've been asked by my team to put in there is opening more scripting languages to be part of the platform."

"Not a perfect ten because the user interface is brand new and it needs improvement."

"There needs to be better error handling and error descriptions. It should be more clear what the errors are and what we can do to fix them."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] cons

"It is a little complex to set up the pipelines within the solution."

"GitLab can improve the integration with third-party applications. It could be made easier. Additionally, having API control from my application could be helpful."

"It's more related to the supporting layer of features, such as issue management and issue tracking. We tend to always use, for example, Jira next to it."

"GitLab doesn't have AWS integration."

"Technologies are always changing. Nowadays, new things like serverless computing and workload management have emerged. We have noticed a few gap items for faster service delivery. For example, we do user interface testing in the latest team and automate it using some tools. Recently, we integrated a tool with user interface testing, which can simulate a multi-user environment. So, we would like to see more integration with different platforms."

"I don't really like the new Kubernetes integration because it is pretty focused on the on-premise environment, but we're in a hybrid environment."

"GitLab's UI could be improved."

"We are having a few problems integrating with Jira at the moment, which is something that our IT department is investigating."

More GitLab cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool."

"I can save time and money more quickly."

"We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."

"Customers often complain about the price."

"It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."

"Regarding pricing, I would rate GitLab as moderately priced, maybe around a seven or eight out of ten. It could be more flexible for clients but generally offers good value."

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

"GitLab is highly priced for smaller teams, but it's okay if considering a user base of thousands."

"GitLab is cheap."

"The open-source version is very good and the commercial version is reasonably priced."

"We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."

"The solution is based on a subscription model and is reasonably priced."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	39
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	50

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

I was using the free version of GitLab , but I think the price is comparative and not a major differentiator.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

Since GitLab [Private Offer Only] the main part is the Git part. With AI being available, I see one thing happening. For example, Claude Code allows people to connect Jira or ClickUp, and then they...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitLab?

My basic use case for Gitlab was the ticket management, the wiki, the CI/CD pipeline, and the code repository. These four use cases form my core usage.

See all answers

Comparisons

UrbanCode Deploy vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

Nolio Release Automation vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Chef vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Plutora vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 27% of the time

SonarQube vs GitLab

Compared 3% of the time

Jenkins vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

Veracode vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

November 2026

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] report

Download Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

October 2026

Download GitLab product report

Also Known As

CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform

Fuzzit

Overview

Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar.

Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

Broadcom

GitLab offers a streamlined approach to software development with features like CI/CD pipelines, platform integration, and security, making it ideal for enhancing team collaboration and project management across environments.

Targeting development teams, GitLab integrates seamlessly with platforms like AWS and Azure to support robust CI/CD workflows, version control, and automation. Its user-friendly design enhances project management efficiency and scalability, while its security measures ensure comprehensive protection. Used both on-premises and in the cloud, it fosters collaboration through branch management and code merging. However, GitLab could improve integration with Atlassian, offer better iOS build support, and enhance its documentation. Users value its AI-driven features, conflict resolution capabilities, and diverse environment support.

What are GitLab's most important features?

CI/CD Pipelines: Automate processes for seamless deployments
Platform Integration: Works with AWS, Azure for streamlined workflows
Version Control: Manage code changes efficiently
Automation: Reduce manual tasks through automated solutions
Security: Ensure robust data protection

What benefits and ROI can users expect from GitLab?

Enhanced Productivity: Streamlined workflows boost efficiency
Scalability: Easily grows with team needs
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork and communication
Efficient Project Management: Manages tasks and resources effectively
Cost-effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing options

GitLab implementation spans industries like finance, healthcare, and technology where it enhances DevOps practices through improved CI/CD processes, automated testing, and efficient infrastructure management. Teams utilize it to manage code repositories, streamline deployments, and facilitate cross-functional collaboration, thus maintaining high development standards and reducing bottlenecks.

GitLab

Sample Customers

BET365, Charter Communications, TASC

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Release Automation. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.