| CTO at Marco Technology | 3.5 | I find this solution easy to use with good support, despite its high cost and monitoring limitations. The Windows-based platform also impacts stability. I rate it 7/10, best suited for large companies with specific needs. |
| Founder and Managing Partner at Better Now | 5.0 | As a reseller, I find Micro Focus Service Virtualization excellent, especially its SAP virtualization and simple setup. While integration with ALM/Jira needs improvement, its stability and clear purpose make it a 10/10 solution. |
| CTO at Marco Technology | 4.0 | I use this product for banking system testing, valuing its ease of use and performance simulation capabilities. I believe protocols and customization need updating, and official support could improve, though it's generally stable. |
| Principal consultant at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees | 3.5 | <p>I find this service virtualization platform's strong integration features and significant organizational savings, over $15M, with good stability and responsive R&D, highly valuable. However, I desire more wizards, protocol support, and a developer web portal for enhanced usability.</p> |
| Sr. Manager- Technology Office at Technology Leader & Evangelist | 4.0 | I find Service Virtualization invaluable for reducing dependencies, preventing costly downtime, and accelerating development and testing, yielding significant ROI. However, I believe market awareness and product stability need improvement, especially with evolving protocols, despite HPE being a strong vendor. |
| Senior QA Manager at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | I've used this tool for two years, finding its REST/SOAP virtualization critical for independent testing and reducing delays. Setup was easy and it scales well. However, the Excel-based data model is cumbersome, and the SQL Server per user is overkill. |
| Service Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.0 | I found the solution easy to use, stable, and scalable, with fantastic support, despite an initially challenging setup. We saved hardware costs, but I hope for reduced license fees. |
| Senior Associate Technology at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.0 | I found HPE Service Virtualization valuable for reducing costs and dependencies, with straightforward setup. Though it had minor past compatibility and stability issues, these were addressed. I ultimately moved from it to Parasoft. |
