Google App Engine Reviews

Users noted that Google App Engine can enhance return on investment if utilized effectively, although there is a learning curve. Costs reduced significantly when switching from VMs, improving financial management. Some users found it more operationally efficient, not needing to manage servers or scaling. While specific ROI figures weren't always available, there was a noticeable decrease in maintenance costs, but this varied according to deployment preferences. Some users did not observe returns in cost or resource savings.

Google App Engine offers competitive pricing at low usage tiers but can become costly with higher use. The pay-as-you-go model includes free F1 usage with 256 MB and charges for F2 and F4 based on memory and CPUs. Prices can rise quicker than competitors, and some users find the platform relatively expensive, especially for the flexible environment. While initial costs are manageable, currency fluctuations can impact perceived affordability.

• "If we don't know how to work with the tool, we might have some spikes in price."
• "We pay the license yearly. It's about $6 a month, which is $72 a year per person, so it's about $500."
• "I would like to have more free application with it. Some of the applications, I am paying more for them. I think that they must be free."

Organizations primarily use Google App Engine for deploying web and business applications, including front-end and backend services. It supports software development, SaaS, APIs, and server-side rendering. App Engine's easy integration with Google services, scalability, and serverless capabilities are highlighted, along with its use across public and private clouds. Users employ it for UI applications, hobby projects, communication and documentation, and cloud migrations, enjoying seamless service authentication and collaboration tool integration.

Google App Engine customer service and support varies. Some users find technical assistance quick, responsive, and efficient, rating it highly. Others appreciate documentation and Stack Overflow support. Some employ third-party partners and experience satisfactory resolutions. A few report challenges, mentioning poor response times or lack of attention from agents. While some issues arise, users with enterprise accounts find it easier to connect with teams promptly, indicating responsible handling of requests. Satisfaction with technical support ratings ranges from two to nine out of ten.

Many describe the initial setup of Google App Engine as straightforward, emphasizing easy integration and config file setup. It efficiently handles traffic fluctuations and offers seamless database integrations. However, some note the complexities for specialized applications and domain attachments. Documentation is praised for simplifying deployments, although a few indicate a learning curve with IDE plugins and non-standard practices. Timeframes for deployment vary, with experiences ranging from a few minutes to several days.

Google App Engine is praised for its scalability, handling traffic automatically and integrating smoothly with other applications. Users value its auto-scaling feature, which eliminates the need for manual scaling. Despite potential delays with flexible instances and some basic scaling limitations, most users find its scalability robust enough for diverse needs. Companies appreciate its ability to operate under heavy loads, though some manual input may be necessary for debugging and optimizing settings.

Google App Engine is widely regarded as stable. Users report minimal disruptions over long periods and find it reliable for applications. Some mention minor performance issues, such as longer deployment times and slower script editing for large files, but stability remains unaffected. Occasional bugs are resolved quickly. Network issues are rare and handled efficiently. Stability is crucial for users, and Google App Engine’s managed nature contributes to its strong reputation in this area.