Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Aqua Cloud Security Platform Logo

Aqua Cloud Security Platform Reviews

4.0 out of 5

What is Aqua Cloud Security Platform?

Featured Aqua Cloud Security Platform reviews

Aqua Cloud Security Platform mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of Aqua Cloud Security Platform in the Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) category stands at 3.3%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Aqua Cloud Security Platform3.3%
Wiz17.4%
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks12.4%
Other66.9%
Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)

PeerResearch reports based on Aqua Cloud Security Platform reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryCloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)Mar 29, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 29, 2026Download
ComparisonAqua Cloud Security Platform vs WizMar 29, 2026Download
ComparisonAqua Cloud Security Platform vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto NetworksMar 29, 2026Download
ComparisonAqua Cloud Security Platform vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud SecurityMar 29, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Wiz4.417.4%97%39 interviewsAdd to research
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security4.36.1%99%118 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business149
Midsize Enterprise78
Large Enterprise428
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
9%
Comms Service Provider
5%
University
5%
Healthcare Company
4%
Retailer
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Media Company
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Construction Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Non Profit
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%

Compare Aqua Cloud Security Platform with alternative products

Learn more about Aqua Cloud Security Platform

Aqua Cloud Security Platform customers

Related questions

 
Aqua Cloud Security Platform Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Business Development Manager at Axoft Ukraine4.5I tested Aqua Cloud Security Platform for protecting data and applications in cloud environments. Its runtime protection and image scanning are invaluable, though improvements are needed in management capabilities and the installation process.
Manager|Cloud Security & Solution Architect| CloudOps|AppSec | DevSecOps | DevOps | CapOps | FinOps at Wipro4.0I use Aqua for flexible, scalable container security and find support helpful. Although the UI can be stressful and I'd like IaC vulnerability scans, it's stable and competitively priced. I rate it 8/10.
DevSecOps Engineer at Foodhub4.0I used Aqua mainly for image and document scanning in DevSecOps pipelines. It was user-friendly, stable, and easier to set up than Prisma. Although the user roles were confusing, I recommend Aqua for its straightforward implementation.
Senior Consultant at Tata Consultancy4.0I primarily use Aqua Security for on-demand container scanning in public clouds, finding its vulnerability protection valuable and stable. While setup seems simple and it scales well, I believe user-friendliness could improve. I rate it 8/10 and recommend it.
Head - Cybersecurity at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5I value Aqua Security's on-demand patching and sandboxing, finding it stable with easy setup and good support. However, its reporting lacks intelligence, the licensing model is flawed for scalability, and it's quite costly. I also dislike its US-only services.
Enterprise Cloud Architect at UBS Financial3.0We use this for network security, valuing its container security. However, we'd like better overview visibility and improved runtime security. We find it stable and scalable, giving it a 6/10 after five years.
Enterprise Cloud Architect at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees4.0I use Aqua Security for Kubernetes CI/CD security. Its scanner is valuable, but I wish logging to Splunk and resource consumption would improve. Despite some support issues, it's stable and scalable, and I rate it eight out of ten.
Data Scientist at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5I use Aqua Security for robust container runtime protection, particularly valuing its Drift Prevention. However, I wish for more open documentation and advanced source code analysis, despite its good stability and scalability.