Checkmk provides a comprehensive monitoring solution designed to streamline IT infrastructure management with features like auto-discovery, custom checks, and effective alerting.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Checkmk | 3.8% |
Zabbix | 11.7% |
LibreNMS | 4.6% |
Other | 79.9% |
Type | Title | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
Category | Network Monitoring Software | Sep 15, 2025 | Download |
Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Sep 15, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Checkmk vs Zabbix | Sep 15, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Checkmk vs Auvik Network Management (ANM) | Sep 15, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Checkmk vs SolarWinds NPM | Sep 15, 2025 | Download |
Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Veeam Data Platform | 4.3 | N/A | 94% | 429 interviewsAdd to research |
Zabbix | 4.2 | 11.7% | 95% | 107 interviewsAdd to research |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 4 |
Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
Large Enterprise | 2 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 202 |
Midsize Enterprise | 127 |
Large Enterprise | 352 |
Checkmk serves as a powerful tool for organizations managing large networks of servers, databases, and network appliances across multiple locations. It simplifies monitoring tasks with features like auto-discovery, custom scripting, and Slack integration. Users benefit from its resource monitoring capabilities and scalability, although there are areas for improvement, such as alert acknowledgment and greater usability. It supports both Linux and Windows environments, enabling effective oversight of IT infrastructure. The growing body of documentation enhances its adaptability in complex settings.
What are the key features of Checkmk?Industries deploying Checkmk frequently utilize it for monitoring IT infrastructure, including servers and network appliances, to manage proactive issue identification and compliance. Companies employ it in the proof of concept phase or for ongoing monitoring, covering hosts, services, and custom application metrics.
Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
---|---|---|
IT Administrator at a construction company with 201-500 employees | 4.5 | I use Checkmk to monitor Dell PowerStore and manage alerts, though it requires PowerShell scripting due to compatibility issues. It effectively tracks volume performance and system metrics but needs better flexibility for script execution intervals. |
Systems Programer at Box Elder School District | 4.5 | I find Checkmk valuable for monitoring servers and network devices, appreciating its comprehensive integration. Though documentation could improve, it's efficient compared to tools like Nagios. Its flexibility and SNMP capabilities save time, though ROI assessment is challenging in education. |
IT Architect at Totalförsvarets plikt- och prövningsverk | 4.0 | I am currently testing Checkmk as a monitoring tool, and its user-friendly platform allows me to easily build charts and it is straightforward to configure. Although not yet in production, I plan to implement it this year. |
Regional Portfolio Manager at First in Business Solutions | 5.0 | I use Checkmk to monitor hosts and services for small customers, especially valuable during power outages. While it's more user-friendly than Nagios and OMD, it needs wider awareness and improved accessibility for newcomers, with potential consideration for cloud-based options. |
Application performance and System monitoring at Agos | 4.5 | I use Checkmk for monitoring our data centers, including servers and custom applications. Its auto-discovery feature is invaluable, though integration, especially with Dynatrace, needs improvement. Despite issues with Dynatrace, Checkmk provides efficient system monitoring capabilities. |
System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I primarily use Checkmk for IT infrastructure monitoring, appreciating its auto-discovery and custom monitoring features. However, alert management needs improvement, and the interface can be complex. Streamlining onboarding and offering an agent-less option would enhance usability. |
DevOps Engineer at NayaPay | 3.5 | I work for a fintech company in Pakistan managing multiple data centers with Checkmk for server and network monitoring. We've effectively integrated it with Slack, and despite a tedious initial setup, it greatly aids in service availability and automated tasks. |
Manager, Information Technology Monitoring at a tech services company with 201-500 employees | 4.0 | We use Checkmk to monitor Linux servers, valuing its integration with event management, ease of scaling, and alerting system. Transitioning from Nagios is challenging, but we've improved our monitoring. It saves time and money by about 50%. |