Access Management solutions should provide robust security and support seamless user experiences. Look for the following features:
Multi-factor authentication
Single sign-on (SSO)
User provisioning and deprovisioning
Role-based access control
Comprehensive reporting and analytics
Integration capabilities
Multi-factor authentication enhances security by requiring multiple verification forms while single sign-on improves user experience by reducing the number of login prompts. User provisioning and deprovisioning efficiently manage user access, ensuring that individuals have the appropriate access rights at any given time.
Role-based access control ensures that users have access only to the resources they need, reinforcing security and compliance. Comprehensive reporting and analytics provide insights into access patterns, helping administrators identify potential security threats. Integration capabilities with other systems ensure that the access management solution works seamlessly across various platforms and technologies.
Search for a product comparison in Access Management
The SINGULAR issue about access management is that AM never took into consideration to prove the identity of the user. All they were able to prove was the initial assertion of the user attempting to access. So AM is actually of no use, even dangerous unless the identity of the end-user is correctly proven, then thereafter manage the user once in the network
Another aspect to look for is proof of user identity.
The most important point is that identification and authentication must be checked in the real endpoint system, not in the gateway. because there are too many ways to access endpoint system like "server to server access" after gateway access control system.
Associate Partner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Vendor
Dec 3, 2019
I'd point you back to your use cases. There is no point in looking at Functional/Non Functional requirements as differentiating elements in selecting tools or services if you don't know what use cases/user journeys, in particular, you're putting AM in to manage.
Access Management solutions provide security and control for managing user identities and permissions within systems. The tools facilitate the authentication and authorization processes, ensuring that the right individuals have access to the appropriate resources.Effective Access Management is crucial for ensuring secure and efficient control over who can access company resources. It supports compliance with regulatory requirements, minimizes the risk of unauthorized access, and enhances...
Access Management solutions should provide robust security and support seamless user experiences. Look for the following features:
Multi-factor authentication enhances security by requiring multiple verification forms while single sign-on improves user experience by reducing the number of login prompts. User provisioning and deprovisioning efficiently manage user access, ensuring that individuals have the appropriate access rights at any given time.
Role-based access control ensures that users have access only to the resources they need, reinforcing security and compliance. Comprehensive reporting and analytics provide insights into access patterns, helping administrators identify potential security threats. Integration capabilities with other systems ensure that the access management solution works seamlessly across various platforms and technologies.
The SINGULAR issue about access management is that AM never took into consideration to prove the identity of the user. All they were able to prove was the initial assertion of the user attempting to access. So AM is actually of no use, even dangerous unless the identity of the end-user is correctly proven, then thereafter manage the user once in the network
Another aspect to look for is proof of user identity.
The most important point is that identification and authentication must be checked in the real endpoint system, not in the gateway. because there are too many ways to access endpoint system like "server to server access" after gateway access control system.
I'd point you back to your use cases. There is no point in looking at Functional/Non Functional requirements as differentiating elements in selecting tools or services if you don't know what use cases/user journeys, in particular, you're putting AM in to manage.