Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with IBM Rational Functional Tester.
What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?
RFT needs to think from a contemporary point of view — from the current context. They need to look at the way they're positioning the tool. They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool. These are the aspects IBM needs to look into it. The moment they look into it, I think they might come up with something new, which can be contextual to the current needs and demands.
If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility. There needs to be more effort made to make the solution more relevant to the application.
I would like to see the UI change analysis functionality for mobile apps.
I'm working for a company with 1000+ employees and I'm exploring two products: Panaya and Tricentis.
How good is Panaya Test Dynamix in comparison with Tricentis?
Let the community know what you think. Share your opinions now!