Initially, it started off with single sign-on and promoted single sign-on within multiple single sign-ons. Over time, it morphed into also implementing what we call authorization policies. That includes limiting when people can access an application in terms of the time of day, or limiting which user populations can use a particular application. It's mainly an access management tool. Over the last four years or so, we've leveraged the integration between Access Manager and the advanced integration framework so that we can now also implement multi-factor authentication.
Technology and Solutions Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Reseller
2021-01-07T10:29:00Z
Jan 7, 2021
Our primary use cases include creating the security patch, control over access, simplifying the control of the organization's access to infrastructureת and obligation services. We provide account security access to profile users with different obligations for information and services to the company.
As a NetIQ Partner we are offering NetIQ Access Manager as a primary choice for controlling application access. The product is mainly designed for Web Application which make this product a good choice for the cloud applications. But it is also a good choice for in-house applications.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Access Manager with Managed Services vs. Symantec Siteminder and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
Symantec Siteminder and OpenText Access Manager with Managed Services are competing in identity and access management. Data comparisons suggest that while Symantec Siteminder has an advantage in pricing and support, OpenText Access Manager offers more robust features, making it the superior choice.Features: Symantec Siteminder provides secure web access management, along with strong identity federation capabilities and single sign-on options. OpenText Access Manager delivers enhanced...
I use NetIQ Access Manager to protect one single application with Multi-Factor Authentication. The solution is deployed on both cloud and on-prem.
Initially, it started off with single sign-on and promoted single sign-on within multiple single sign-ons. Over time, it morphed into also implementing what we call authorization policies. That includes limiting when people can access an application in terms of the time of day, or limiting which user populations can use a particular application. It's mainly an access management tool. Over the last four years or so, we've leveraged the integration between Access Manager and the advanced integration framework so that we can now also implement multi-factor authentication.
Our primary use cases include creating the security patch, control over access, simplifying the control of the organization's access to infrastructureת and obligation services. We provide account security access to profile users with different obligations for information and services to the company.
We work with farmer federations. We primarily use the solution for authentication and single sign-on capabilities.
As a NetIQ Partner we are offering NetIQ Access Manager as a primary choice for controlling application access. The product is mainly designed for Web Application which make this product a good choice for the cloud applications. But it is also a good choice for in-house applications.