Hi Everyone,
What do you like most about Barracuda Web Application Firewall?
Thanks for sharing your thoughts with the community!
Some of the most valuable features are the ease of deployment, the Barracuda support, the easy-to-use console, and the granularity of the reports.
The installation is straightforward.
The solution is user-friendly and easy to set up.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall provides optimized performance, a user-friendly environment, helpful dashboards, and is simple to use.
The initial setup is pretty straightforward, especially if you enlist assistance.
We use Barracuda to protect the application. That's the main feature we use it for.
Its recommendation about the probabilities on the website is great. It also has free probability managers for the website, which is really helpful.
The protection engine, signature-based protection behavior, and analysis features are also great. It also has an ATP module for sandbox scanning and behavior analysis for file uploads.
The solution offers multiple security features. There are machine learning features and great URL encryption. It also offers multi-protocol support against DDoS attacks.
The stability of the solution is good. I don't think we've experienced bugs, crashes, or glitches.
You don't need help from Barracuda to help with the deployment. The deployment is easy.
The most valuable features are the client VPN and content filtering.
It's very simple and predictable, because Barracuda provides a vision of the current state of your application. It gives you an understanding of what is happening on your site and any attempts against you at your source. This is the main value that Web Application Firewall provides our company. These aspects are also the main reason for this documentation process.
The most valuable feature is the automatic content filtering.
The most valuable feature of this solution is the simplicity of configuration.
The volumetric DDoS defense is very good because I had a problem with a lot of volumetric DDoS attacks on my servers. After using Barracuda, those attacks have stopped and all the traffic is going smoothly to my servers and the system is working really well.
The updating and signature features are my primary use case for the solution. These features are beneficial to my organization.
It allows us to scale out to multiple phase servers.
This product gives us visibility into what is going on in two servers, including connections and sessions, real-time alerts, very good reporting, and KPIs. It makes managing security of a critical server very easy, with a friendly GUI.
Hello,
At the moment, I'm doing research about WAFs and I'd like to get your inputs on which product is better in terms of features and application security control: F5 WAF or Barracuda WAF.
Thanks for the help!
Let the community know what you think. Share your opinions now!