Right now, six people use Tricentis NeoLoad within the company. Two people take care of the deployment of Tricentis NeoLoad, and two to three people handle its maintenance. There's a plan to increase usage for Tricentis NeoLoad, mainly because my company is trying to explore more tool features. If it's easier to integrate Tricentis NeoLoad with third-party monitoring tools, then usage could be increased. My advice to others planning to implement Tricentis NeoLoad is to first look into the applications to be tested because there's a limitation in the tool right now, particularly the feasibility of testing Web and Citrix Desk applications. There's also no support for other applications. If you need testing for different protocols, for example, Oracle or JDBC database applications, you'll need to use a different tool because Tricentis NeoLoad currently doesn't have compatibility. It's better first to find out what applications you want to test, your testing goal, and if that would be compatible with Tricentis NeoLoad. I'm rating Tricentis NeoLoad as seven out of ten.
This is a user-friendly and straightforward solution with a good support system. Unlike JMeter or LoadRunner, it doesn't require significant coding knowledge. I rate this solution eight out of 10.
Vice President - Global Head of Delivery at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 10
2022-08-09T15:06:01Z
Aug 9, 2022
I'm using the latest version of Tricentis NeoLoad. In my company, two people from the performance testing department use Tricentis NeoLoad. My rating for Tricentis NeoLoad is eight out of ten. My advice to others looking to start using Tricentis NeoLoad is that it's a good product, and it would be money well spent. My company is into product development, and it's a user or a customer of Tricentis NeoLoad.
Senior Manager Test Automation at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts
Real User
Top 10
2022-05-05T07:41:23Z
May 5, 2022
I would encourage others to take a look at this solution. It is a good solution and they maintain the technical expertise needed for success. I rate Tricentis NeoLoad an eight out of ten.
I'm rating Tricentis NeoLoad seven out of ten, while Micro Focus LoadRunner I'm rating a five out of ten. I'm not giving Tricentis NeoLoad a score of ten because I want to see more out of it in terms of integration, particularly how it integrates with other Tricentis products. There is a customized version for BlazeMeter, but it's a solution that cannot be compared with either Micro Focus LoadRunner or Tricentis NeoLoad, because it is more of an open source solution, so you do not get support that's comparable with the support you get from paid solutions.
Newer additions such as NeoLoad SAP, Citrix, NeoLoad Web, etc. are excellent extensions with a broad range of new functions. Organizations should be aware that there are limited videos available on the internet regarding NeoLoad so they should ensure that they receive proper training from the reseller/integrator upon purchase.
I would rate this solution 9 out of 10. I wouldn't give it a 10 because there are some issues that need to be resolved from the tool side. Before using the tool, you need to understand the product you are going to design, the different types of performance applications that you are going to do performance testing with, and whether or not NeoLoad supports it. If yes, then go ahead. Otherwise, I would say go back to LoadRunner because whatever the application is, LoadRunner will support it.
NeoLoad is a good tool for banking or telecom applications. When compared with the LoadRunner, NeoLoad will support almost all necessary features including reporting. It is a good tool. Overall, I would rate the solution at a six out of ten.
Automation Test Engineer and Team Lead at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-01-04T09:02:05Z
Jan 4, 2021
We're currently looking for a NeoLoad alternative. I prefer dynamic tools because we should be able to change the script and NeoLoad didn't allow us to do that. I'm looking for a tool that will allow for a weekly or monthly script change and provide us with the ability to update whatever has been recorded. I would rate this solution a seven out of 10.
Director, IT DevOps & Quality Engineering at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-06-18T05:18:35Z
Jun 18, 2020
My advice to anybody who is implementing NeoLoad is to first understand the technical requirements. Also, it is important to make sure that you have access to the endpoints that you want to load-test on. Overall, it seems like a good product. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Release Test Manager at a tech company with 201-500 employees
Real User
2020-02-16T08:27:41Z
Feb 16, 2020
We have pretty close to the latest version of the solution but are currently trying to make an upgrade. I can recommend that product. I'd also recommend that new or potential users do some training. It's a good idea to use experienced partners or consultants to assist with the initial setup. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
Tricentis NeoLoad is a performance testing tool that provides developers and testers with automatic test design, test maintenance, realistic simulation of user behavior, fast root cause analysis, and built-in integrations with the entire SDLC toolchain. With NeoLoad’s plugins, teams can reuse and share test assets and results from functional testing tools, analytics, metrics, and APM tools in order to catch performance issues early. With NeoLoad’s full tech stack support, users can test the...
Right now, six people use Tricentis NeoLoad within the company. Two people take care of the deployment of Tricentis NeoLoad, and two to three people handle its maintenance. There's a plan to increase usage for Tricentis NeoLoad, mainly because my company is trying to explore more tool features. If it's easier to integrate Tricentis NeoLoad with third-party monitoring tools, then usage could be increased. My advice to others planning to implement Tricentis NeoLoad is to first look into the applications to be tested because there's a limitation in the tool right now, particularly the feasibility of testing Web and Citrix Desk applications. There's also no support for other applications. If you need testing for different protocols, for example, Oracle or JDBC database applications, you'll need to use a different tool because Tricentis NeoLoad currently doesn't have compatibility. It's better first to find out what applications you want to test, your testing goal, and if that would be compatible with Tricentis NeoLoad. I'm rating Tricentis NeoLoad as seven out of ten.
This is a user-friendly and straightforward solution with a good support system. Unlike JMeter or LoadRunner, it doesn't require significant coding knowledge. I rate this solution eight out of 10.
I'm using the latest version of Tricentis NeoLoad. In my company, two people from the performance testing department use Tricentis NeoLoad. My rating for Tricentis NeoLoad is eight out of ten. My advice to others looking to start using Tricentis NeoLoad is that it's a good product, and it would be money well spent. My company is into product development, and it's a user or a customer of Tricentis NeoLoad.
I would encourage others to take a look at this solution. It is a good solution and they maintain the technical expertise needed for success. I rate Tricentis NeoLoad an eight out of ten.
I'm rating Tricentis NeoLoad seven out of ten, while Micro Focus LoadRunner I'm rating a five out of ten. I'm not giving Tricentis NeoLoad a score of ten because I want to see more out of it in terms of integration, particularly how it integrates with other Tricentis products. There is a customized version for BlazeMeter, but it's a solution that cannot be compared with either Micro Focus LoadRunner or Tricentis NeoLoad, because it is more of an open source solution, so you do not get support that's comparable with the support you get from paid solutions.
Newer additions such as NeoLoad SAP, Citrix, NeoLoad Web, etc. are excellent extensions with a broad range of new functions. Organizations should be aware that there are limited videos available on the internet regarding NeoLoad so they should ensure that they receive proper training from the reseller/integrator upon purchase.
I would rate this solution 9 out of 10. I wouldn't give it a 10 because there are some issues that need to be resolved from the tool side. Before using the tool, you need to understand the product you are going to design, the different types of performance applications that you are going to do performance testing with, and whether or not NeoLoad supports it. If yes, then go ahead. Otherwise, I would say go back to LoadRunner because whatever the application is, LoadRunner will support it.
NeoLoad is a good tool for banking or telecom applications. When compared with the LoadRunner, NeoLoad will support almost all necessary features including reporting. It is a good tool. Overall, I would rate the solution at a six out of ten.
If you are dealing only with web HTTP, you can definitely go ahead with this solution because time is money. I would rate NeoLoad an eight out of 10.
We're currently looking for a NeoLoad alternative. I prefer dynamic tools because we should be able to change the script and NeoLoad didn't allow us to do that. I'm looking for a tool that will allow for a weekly or monthly script change and provide us with the ability to update whatever has been recorded. I would rate this solution a seven out of 10.
My advice to anybody who is implementing NeoLoad is to first understand the technical requirements. Also, it is important to make sure that you have access to the endpoints that you want to load-test on. Overall, it seems like a good product. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
We have pretty close to the latest version of the solution but are currently trying to make an upgrade. I can recommend that product. I'd also recommend that new or potential users do some training. It's a good idea to use experienced partners or consultants to assist with the initial setup. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
This is definitely a solution that I recommend. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
You will love NeoLoad moving from open source and code-based performance tools.