Systems Engineer Lead at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2022-05-01T05:40:35Z
May 1, 2022
IBM provides methods where you can test the product before purchasing it, either in the cloud or on site. They're willing to come out and set up a demo for you. This is a good way to be able to test something before you make a decision. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
I would advise others to push their marketing representatives to give a simplified licensing solution, or if you outsource, to an IT vendor, have them deal with the complexities of the process. I rate IBM Workload Automation an eight out of ten.
There are approximately 50-plus users making use of the solution in our organization. My advice is that the implementation be handled by someone with the requisite knowledge. This will be difficult for someone who is not properly acquainted with IBM products. It should be done by someone who knows the IBM environment, who would find the process much easier to handle. I rate IBM Workload Automation as an eight out of ten.
IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-02-16T08:27:36Z
Feb 16, 2020
The advice I would give to others considering using Workload Automation depends on the necessity and the reality of their requirements. It depends on the complexity of the jobs. Depending on that it may be interesting to use Tivoli because it is a good tool. It is a good application to use to run workload tracking. On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate this product between and eight and ten depending on who is using it and for what reason. I think it is quite good so I think it deserves a nine. Additional features I would like to see included in the next release to improve and make it a ten would just be the two things I mentioned that Control-M does somewhat better for now. The interface for the operator should be improved, and the way to create relationships and dependency between the jobs can be better.
All businesses search for ways to reduce costs and maximize productivity. In order to achieve this, companies often need to get creative in just what kind of practices they implement. One of the methods that many companies turn to to achieve this goal is workload automation.
I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.
This is a good tool and I recommend it. I rate it seven out of 10.
IBM provides methods where you can test the product before purchasing it, either in the cloud or on site. They're willing to come out and set up a demo for you. This is a good way to be able to test something before you make a decision. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
I would advise others to push their marketing representatives to give a simplified licensing solution, or if you outsource, to an IT vendor, have them deal with the complexities of the process. I rate IBM Workload Automation an eight out of ten.
There are approximately 50-plus users making use of the solution in our organization. My advice is that the implementation be handled by someone with the requisite knowledge. This will be difficult for someone who is not properly acquainted with IBM products. It should be done by someone who knows the IBM environment, who would find the process much easier to handle. I rate IBM Workload Automation as an eight out of ten.
I would rate IBM Workload Automation a seven out of ten.
I would definitely recommend this product. It's an interesting option in terms of schedulers. I would rate it an eight out of ten.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
The advice I would give to others considering using Workload Automation depends on the necessity and the reality of their requirements. It depends on the complexity of the jobs. Depending on that it may be interesting to use Tivoli because it is a good tool. It is a good application to use to run workload tracking. On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate this product between and eight and ten depending on who is using it and for what reason. I think it is quite good so I think it deserves a nine. Additional features I would like to see included in the next release to improve and make it a ten would just be the two things I mentioned that Control-M does somewhat better for now. The interface for the operator should be improved, and the way to create relationships and dependency between the jobs can be better.