Unit Head System Implementor at Allied Bank Limited
Real User
Top 5
2025-09-25T06:21:07Z
Sep 25, 2025
My current domain is leading project development, overseeing both technical and functional areas in process automation and orchestration, along with the hands-on implementation of process automation.I want to ensure that my credentials, including my picture, are included in the publication on peerspot.com, as I would like to share my feedback with my network. I would like to elaborate on various IBM products like DOORS or WebSphere, but I have to join another meeting at this moment. Based on my experience with IBM Security Verify Access, I would rate this solution 8 out of 10.
Chief Information Security Officer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
2022-07-24T07:26:48Z
Jul 24, 2022
My company uses multiple solutions, and one of them is IBM Security Access Manager. In general, I would rate IBM Security Access Manager eight out of ten because its scalability is good. As a product, it's good, for example, it has good features. It's only the support that has an issue. I would recommend IBM Security Access Manager to users running IBM environments, otherwise, the market has many simplified solutions. If your company has IBM tools and an IBM environment, it's a must for me to recommend IBM Security Access Manager because using the solution would be easier for you. Otherwise, there's no limitation as the market is open and you'd find multiple, good solutions in the market. My company has a partnership with IBM.
Assitant Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2022-03-25T21:39:28Z
Mar 25, 2022
I would advise looking for a product with good performance and advanced functionalities, especially on the security side. There should be stability and up-to-date or latest functionalities. Generally, if a product is stable, it doesn't have advanced functions, and if a product is highly advanced, it may not be stable. You should try to find a combination of both. It also depends on your requirements. Some people have small-scale usage, and performance might not be their concern, but security should always be a priority. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
It's a good solution for identification and access management. It's a mature solution and the support is good. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Manager in Digital Identity at PricewaterhouseCoopers
Real User
2019-11-17T06:49:00Z
Nov 17, 2019
We use the on-premises deployment model. Typically we deal with enterprise-level organizations. We're an IBM partner and reseller. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
IBM Security Verify Access is a complete authorization and network security policy management solution. It provides end-to-end protection of resources over geographically dispersed intranets and extranets.Provides a wide range of built-in authenticators and supports external authenticators.Provides permit and deny decisions for protected resources requests in the secure domain through the authorization API.Manages secure access to private internal network-based resources by using the public...
My current domain is leading project development, overseeing both technical and functional areas in process automation and orchestration, along with the hands-on implementation of process automation.I want to ensure that my credentials, including my picture, are included in the publication on peerspot.com, as I would like to share my feedback with my network. I would like to elaborate on various IBM products like DOORS or WebSphere, but I have to join another meeting at this moment. Based on my experience with IBM Security Verify Access, I would rate this solution 8 out of 10.
I rate the product an eight out of ten.
My company uses multiple solutions, and one of them is IBM Security Access Manager. In general, I would rate IBM Security Access Manager eight out of ten because its scalability is good. As a product, it's good, for example, it has good features. It's only the support that has an issue. I would recommend IBM Security Access Manager to users running IBM environments, otherwise, the market has many simplified solutions. If your company has IBM tools and an IBM environment, it's a must for me to recommend IBM Security Access Manager because using the solution would be easier for you. Otherwise, there's no limitation as the market is open and you'd find multiple, good solutions in the market. My company has a partnership with IBM.
I would advise looking for a product with good performance and advanced functionalities, especially on the security side. There should be stability and up-to-date or latest functionalities. Generally, if a product is stable, it doesn't have advanced functions, and if a product is highly advanced, it may not be stable. You should try to find a combination of both. It also depends on your requirements. Some people have small-scale usage, and performance might not be their concern, but security should always be a priority. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
I rate IBM Security Access Manager an eight out of ten.
It's a good solution for identification and access management. It's a mature solution and the support is good. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
We use the on-premises deployment model. Typically we deal with enterprise-level organizations. We're an IBM partner and reseller. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.