What advice do you have for others considering Fortinet FortiNAC?

We utilize multiple Fortinet products including FortiAnalyzer, FortiManager, FortiNAC, FortiGate, FortiSwitch, FortiAP, FortiMonitor, FortiVPN, and FortiClient. We also have a FortiGate virtual appliance to enhance the SD-WAN features, and we are currently working with Microsoft Azure. We have implemented multiple policies including authorized devices, operation system version requirements, device patch level requirements, and company certificate validation. These four constitute our biggest defined policies. Regarding automated response, we have configured the feature for denying network access to unauthorized devices. However, we have not configured the automatic response feature for threat detection. The implementation is consistent across all areas. On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution a 9.

My overall experience with Fortinet FortiNAC is rated five out of ten. Improvement areas include the GUI, integration with non-Fortinet tools, stability, and introducing AI features. Integrating AI could minimize human intervention, which is currently necessary for operations due to NAC's nature.

I would rate FortiNAC as an eight out of ten. I recommend it for its flexibility and ability to integrate with other technologies and vendor solutions.

The NAC solution performs exceptionally well, particularly in a Fortinet environment (e.g., FortiSwitch, FortiGate, FortiAP). It offers seamless high availability, robust automation, and excellent network visibility and discovery capabilities.

However, the setup process can be complicated, the device profiling needs improvement, and software is quite buggy. I would rate it 7 out of 10. For large-scale deployments, I would prefer Forescout or Cisco ISE

I'd rate it around 7-8 out of 10.

Pros:

1. Integration: Seamless integration with other Fortinet products.


2. Visibility: Provides good network visibility and device discovery.


3. Automation: Offers automated responses to security incidents.


4. Scalability: Works well for both small and large networks.

Cons:

1. Complexity: Can be complex to set up and manage, especially for smaller IT teams.


2. Cost: May be expensive compared to some alternatives, particularly for smaller organizations.


3. Learning curve: Requires time and expertise to fully utilize all features.

I'd rate it around 7-8 out of 10.

Pros:

1. Integration: Seamless integration with other Fortinet products.


2. Visibility: Provides good network visibility and device discovery.


3. Automation: Offers automated responses to security incidents.


4. Scalability: Works well for both small and large networks.

Cons:

1. Complexity: Can be complex to set up and manage, especially for smaller IT teams.


2. Cost: May be expensive compared to some alternatives, particularly for smaller organizations.


3. Learning curve: Requires time and expertise to fully utilize all features.

It is a good product. Based on the requirement, it may not be meant for enterprise customers with diversified or heterogeneous infrastructure. However, if an organization has one or two sets of OEM solutions meeting their requirement, Fortinet can still be explored as a solution. I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

I would recommend the solution to others and rate it a nine out of ten.

I rate Fortinet FortiNAC a nine out of ten.

Integrating FortiNAC with other vendors can be challenging, especially for Ruckus and Intelisys. We find Cisco ISE more comfortable for vendor integration. I recommend FortiNAC, but with the caveat that users may encounter challenges with integration and stability. I rate it a seven out of ten.

As an architect, I understand the tool's mechanism. Overall, I rate the solution a 6 out of 10.

I would rate Fortinet FortiNAC nine out of ten. The high cost of the license reduces my rating from a perfect ten. Fortinet FortiNAC offers comprehensive control and visibility of our network, providing detailed information about all connected devices and users, ensuring peace of mind.

I rate Fortinet FortiNAC 9 out of 10.

I would rate Fortinet FortiNAC a seven out of ten.

I would recommend this solution primarily because, in the majority of cases, we have observed significant improvements in the security posture of our original customers and enterprise users. It effectively addresses issues arising from endpoint connections to the network, contributing to an enhanced overall security solution for our clients. I would rate it nine out of ten.

It is a good product considering network security. It supports multiple devices and is easy to use. I can repair the box quickly in case of some failure. I rate it an eight out of ten.

I would definitely recommend the product to others, but it is always good to do a POC first. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I would recommend Fortinet FortiNAC. Overall, I would give it an eight out of ten. The UI could be improved, but overall, it's a good solution.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten. It is a good product.

We are using the Fortinet FortiNAC 9.2 version. Since Fortinet FortiNAC is a network access control solution, it is better to have it on-premises, and closer to the devices it will manage. Sometimes we have a lot of issues either because of the old models of switches the customers are using, or the customer is using a type of switch that is not manageable. However, that's more of a design issue. You must have a good network for you to be able to use Fortinet FortiNAC. If you don't have a full network project with new devices and router switches, you must first fix your network. Overall, I rate Fortinet FortiNAC a nine out of ten.

If you're considering implementing FortiNAC, I recommend determining which type of implementation is suitable for your needs. FortiNAC can handle most configurations easily, but Cisco ISE works with only Cisco devices. Thus, FortiNAC is suitable for multivendor topologies, whereas Cisco ISE is not. Overall, I would rate FortiNAC at eight out of ten.

If people are looking for a smooth operation and don't want the trouble of using Cisco ISE or Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC is a great solution to consider. It's easy to set up, especially if you have an all-Fortinet environment with FortiSwitches, FortiGate Firewall, and FortiAPs. It can make your life much easier. I rate Fortinet FortiNAC a seven out of ten.

Fortinet performs all the services we require from them. The implementation of the solution is easy. Overall, I would rate Fortinet FortiNAC a nine out of ten.

I rate this solution seven out of 10.

I rate the solution a seven out of ten. If the deployment is strictly on a wired network it takes about a week however, if it is primarily on a wireless network it can take about three weeks. Maintaining the solution is easy. The only area that may require additional support is if there is a large number of new guest users on the network. That requires admin approval for each user individually and takes time. I would say it is a good solution, especially if you have IOT onboarding with a sponsor. You will be able to manage your users in a seamless way.

I would rate this solution seven out of ten.

It is a brilliant solution. My advice to those looking into the product would be to ensure that you get trained on how to use the solution so that you can fully appreciate and understand how to effectively implement and manage it. Then, secondly, you should do your research on the price. I don't know what the pricing is like from Fortinet, but we are not allowed to deal directly with them so we had to go through a distributor, which increased the price. Sometimes, if there is only one distributor in an area, you can get exploited. On the technical side, I would rate this solution as a ten out of ten, but I'm not happy with the price, so as a whole, I would rate it as an eight out of ten.

I would recommend this solution to others, it is very good. They are a world leader in security and they have the best combination of network access. I rate Fortinet FortiNAC a nine out of ten.

We are a partner and reseller of Fortinet solutions. We did not have good luck with this product. It didn't work for my client. Maybe it works in other setups better, however, for us, it just was a disaster. I'd rate the product at a three out of ten.

I would rate this solution 5 out of 10. It's a difficult solution. I used to be the FortiNAC guy, so I will be tough on them. In Saudi, I was the number three FortiNAC guy. I can recommend FortiNAC for SMBs: small and medium businesses, but they will still suffer. I would recommend Forescout more.

Overall I am satisfied with the solution. My advice to others wanting to implement Fortinet FortiNAC I would recommend before the start of the deployment to have a good summary of the documents ready. It makes it easier to follow the guides and have knowledge of their network beforehand. I rate Fortinet FortiNAC an eight out of ten.

I would recommend Fortinet FortiNAC to others because we did evaluate other NAC solutions and this solution is very good compared to the others. The best benefit of Fortinet FortiNAC is the stability and it can work with other vendors. Some NAC products only work with their products and do not support other vendors. The major benefit I have found is that this solution can work with other products. A customer typically has more than one vendor, such as access points, printers, and other network products. A lot of the other vendors only are working with their products. It's very important for me that Fortinet FortiNAC can work with the other vendors properly and can integrate easily. When I check the Fortinet website, it shows every vendor's details with an explanation about the integration of the Fortinet FortiNAC. For example, you can find out how to integrate the Fortinet FortiNAC with the Cisco wireless controller. I can find the documents, turn to the pages and find all the information I need. I can find it very easily. I rate Fortinet FortiNAC a nine out of ten.

Be sure to carefully read over the documentation pack because it's really great — I Absolutely love it. On a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of ten.

My advice for anybody who is considering this product is to first do a proof of concept. Everybody has different requirements and it is best to ensure that FortiNAC meets your needs before implementing it. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

I try to push the use of this product because sometimes, the complicated solutions like Cisco ISE sometimes make the customers feel annoyed. My advice to anybody who is considering this solution is that if the budget allows it, the entire security solution should be made up of Fortinet products. They integrate well and it will be better overall. A complete and secure solution will include products like FortiSandbox and FortiAnalyzer as well. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

You need to think about what you need as a company. There are so many government institutions, so many corporate institutions in the world that want to protect their networks. People have different privileges within a network, an instructor cannot have the same privileges as a normal user and the guest. We have guests coming onto our network, contractors coming to work at different times on the network, the main users who are working in different departments and who shouldn't have access to some platforms. When it comes to authentication you need to make sure you're protected from all kinds of threats. You have different products, Vendors and divices that all need to be controlled. If something goes off you need to know where and why. I would rate this product a eight out of 10. It's still evolving.

I don't exactly remember the version our clients are using currently, however, and I believe it is vm based for 2000 devices. We don't actually use the solution in our own organization, but we have deployed it and we provide service, support, and monitoring on the devices to our clients.

The good thing about FortiNAC is that it's more vendor agnostic. And then we have the deployed FortiNAC activate solution, which are different kinds of firewalls, which works perfectly fine. On a scale from one to 10, my rating for this program will be a nine. Additional features that I would like to see included in the next release of this solution is more integration with third-party products and probably some improvements on the dashboard.

I would rate this product an eight out of 10.

We use the on-premises deployment model. In terms of advice I'd give to others, I'd say the most important thing to worry about is organizing the network, like active directory groups and groups of users, etc. Organize the groups with VLAN IDs that are not too specific and the VLANs should be on all company switches. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I would rate this solution at a seven or eight out of 10. If they improved their network devices and their IoT product I would rate them higher. The solution is pretty inexpensive. That's why we are using it. I am satisfied with the interface, the dashboard, and the overall support.