Senior Network Consultant | Tech Lead WLAN at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Reseller
Top 5
2023-12-20T16:54:52Z
Dec 20, 2023
I rate ExtremeWireless a seven out of ten. It is a good product suitable for medium and enterprise companies. It might work out well for smaller companies. However, it works best for larger companies.
I am working with the cloud-based systems. If we want something that is really good and does not fail, we must use ExtremeWireless. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
We can offer ExtremeWireless as a good solution for managing and maintaining endpoint compatibility devices to companies looking for an on-premise solution compatible with their equipment. The solution can benefit companies that use most warehouses or scanners, manufactured equipment, or goods. Overall, I rate ExtremeWireless an eight out of ten.
I rate ExtremeWireless nine out of 10. We only go with the universal APs. I wouldn't recommend any other APs or switches from Extreme because they are quickly phasing other models out and transitioning all their technologies to Universal APs.
Principal Systems Engineer at a construction company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
2022-08-26T21:05:49Z
Aug 26, 2022
In summary, this is not a product that I recommend. Rather, I would suggest that people implement Cisco instead. With Cisco, you get a true enterprise-class, best-in-breed solution. The Cisco support is top-notch, and the Cisco community is unlike anything else. Cisco's website is intuitive, they communicate rather effectively, whereas, Extreme is a smaller company and their website is not intuitive. The cloud-managed portal changes, it seems like on a whim, without communication. One month it might be that you find something like a configuration item here, and then the next month it's hidden somewhere else. Whereas, Cisco is much more streamlined, much more communicative, and much more intuitive to use. I would rate this solution a four out of ten.
Assistnat Professor in Computer Science and Engineering Department at Walchand College of Engineering
Real User
Top 5
2022-06-23T13:05:19Z
Jun 23, 2022
We use both the cloud and the on-premises devices. My advice is that new users should take two solutions. They should have a local NMS kind of thing that should be there and not generally only be based on the cloud. Every device that we have should be able to push on the network management software. It should be compatible with other devices also. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's not complete. It should be competitive with other devices also, not only from XP. The cost of this product is also somewhat on the higher side as compared to the other devices.
Head of Information technologies systems department at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-11-16T20:46:49Z
Nov 16, 2021
We are n the process of deciding if we are going to switch to another solution such as Huawei, Cisco, or Aruba. I rate ExtremeWireless a seven out of ten.
I cannot speak to the exact version number we are using at this time. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We're quite happy with its capabilities. So far, I would recommend the product to other organizations.
CEO at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 20
2020-04-30T10:58:56Z
Apr 30, 2020
With the inception of the Extreme Cloud, we are now in the process of migrating all of our customers to that cloud-based deployment. Concerning Extreme Wireless, our customers are happy and I haven't had any specific requests for new features. My advice for anybody who is implementing this solution is to take the required training. I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
Extreme ExtremeWireless Access Points deliver wired-like performance, at scale for high-density in every environment. Smart Access Points are equally adept for both distributed and centralized deployment models. ExtremeWireless Controllers provide advanced functionality to allow organizations to define how wireless voice/video/data traffic is processed without architectural constraints and in accordance with business needs.
I rate ExtremeWireless a seven out of ten. It is a good product suitable for medium and enterprise companies. It might work out well for smaller companies. However, it works best for larger companies.
I recommend ExtremeWireless to others and rate it an eight out of ten.
I am working with the cloud-based systems. If we want something that is really good and does not fail, we must use ExtremeWireless. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Overall, I rate ExtremeWireless an eight out of ten.
We can offer ExtremeWireless as a good solution for managing and maintaining endpoint compatibility devices to companies looking for an on-premise solution compatible with their equipment. The solution can benefit companies that use most warehouses or scanners, manufactured equipment, or goods. Overall, I rate ExtremeWireless an eight out of ten.
I rate ExtremeWireless nine out of 10. We only go with the universal APs. I wouldn't recommend any other APs or switches from Extreme because they are quickly phasing other models out and transitioning all their technologies to Universal APs.
In summary, this is not a product that I recommend. Rather, I would suggest that people implement Cisco instead. With Cisco, you get a true enterprise-class, best-in-breed solution. The Cisco support is top-notch, and the Cisco community is unlike anything else. Cisco's website is intuitive, they communicate rather effectively, whereas, Extreme is a smaller company and their website is not intuitive. The cloud-managed portal changes, it seems like on a whim, without communication. One month it might be that you find something like a configuration item here, and then the next month it's hidden somewhere else. Whereas, Cisco is much more streamlined, much more communicative, and much more intuitive to use. I would rate this solution a four out of ten.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
We use both the cloud and the on-premises devices. My advice is that new users should take two solutions. They should have a local NMS kind of thing that should be there and not generally only be based on the cloud. Every device that we have should be able to push on the network management software. It should be compatible with other devices also. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's not complete. It should be competitive with other devices also, not only from XP. The cost of this product is also somewhat on the higher side as compared to the other devices.
I rate ExtremeWireless a nine out of ten.
I would rate this solution as eight out of ten.
I would recommend this solution to others. I rate ExtremeWireless a four out of ten.
We are n the process of deciding if we are going to switch to another solution such as Huawei, Cisco, or Aruba. I rate ExtremeWireless a seven out of ten.
I would rate Extreme Wireless a nine out of ten.
I cannot speak to the exact version number we are using at this time. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We're quite happy with its capabilities. So far, I would recommend the product to other organizations.
My advice for anybody who is implementing Extreme Wireless is not to use MAC address filtering. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
In summary, this is a good product and one that I recommend. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
With the inception of the Extreme Cloud, we are now in the process of migrating all of our customers to that cloud-based deployment. Concerning Extreme Wireless, our customers are happy and I haven't had any specific requests for new features. My advice for anybody who is implementing this solution is to take the required training. I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.