The advice I would give to others looking into using Codefresh is that they need to have that budget. Whoever wants to use Codefresh needs to have the budget and a return on investment. They need to have money from the client or vendors so that they can invest in Codefresh. Otherwise, it is a nice solution if the money is there. Somebody can log into Codefresh and do the project things. I would rate my overall experience with Codefresh a seven out of ten.
Previously, the process had to be done by three to four DevOps engineers, which included writing the YAML file, managing the containers running in Kubernetes, managing the configuration file, and checking for successful deployments in development and staging before doing blue-green and canary deployments, but now everything has been automated. Codefresh has made the most positive impact by reducing errors; sometimes humans make errors, especially during high-pressure times or with a high workload. It can be hard to configure the files, and we can misconfigure them, leading to wrong deployments, but with the one-time job of configuring the Kubernetes configuration file, it is very easy for repetitive tasks, and it has also reduced repetitive tasks by being triggered automatically once the code is pushed. Initially, we tried the free trial application, and now we are using a team plan which is managed by the upper teams. I would rate this product a nine out of ten.
Codefresh is a progressive tool tailored for enhancing DevOps teams, enabling swift deployments with its Kubernetes-native architecture while supporting GitOps control to provide a centralized view of Argo CD runtimes and clusters.Codefresh stands out by integrating real-time application health monitoring, efficient artifact management, and smart deployment strategies. Automation features reduce manual efforts allowing seamless version control integration. While users appreciate its...
The advice I would give to others looking into using Codefresh is that they need to have that budget. Whoever wants to use Codefresh needs to have the budget and a return on investment. They need to have money from the client or vendors so that they can invest in Codefresh. Otherwise, it is a nice solution if the money is there. Somebody can log into Codefresh and do the project things. I would rate my overall experience with Codefresh a seven out of ten.
Previously, the process had to be done by three to four DevOps engineers, which included writing the YAML file, managing the containers running in Kubernetes, managing the configuration file, and checking for successful deployments in development and staging before doing blue-green and canary deployments, but now everything has been automated. Codefresh has made the most positive impact by reducing errors; sometimes humans make errors, especially during high-pressure times or with a high workload. It can be hard to configure the files, and we can misconfigure them, leading to wrong deployments, but with the one-time job of configuring the Kubernetes configuration file, it is very easy for repetitive tasks, and it has also reduced repetitive tasks by being triggered automatically once the code is pushed. Initially, we tried the free trial application, and now we are using a team plan which is managed by the upper teams. I would rate this product a nine out of ten.