WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Reviews

We use it to manage five of our vehicles. It's a data integration tool.

The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations. 

The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it.  

I have been using WSO2 for two to three years. 

The stability and scalability are normal. No issues with that. 

We have contacted their support and they were good but not perfect. 

The deployment took a few hours. 

It is possible to start with a free solution, and that's why it is a good starting point.

It is a good solution. It has many integration components. 

I would rate it a six out of ten. Not a ten because it's not so easy and it's a little difficult to deploy on a platform. It is difficult to build a high availability platform.

In the next release, it should be faster. 

Our primary use for this product is solution core integration. We recently used this for a project in the financial sector, where we were integrating different legacy systems and internal systems. This was a proof of concept project that has now been completed.

We have also used this solution for other elements, such as presenting management systems and as an API gateway host.

We are using the on-premise deployment model.

The learning curve for this solution is very good.

It is an open-source solution, so it is better in terms of cost.

We had some challenges with the installation of this solution. We were using the open-source version with no support, and I expect that if we had the paid version then this would have been fixed.

I would like to see better documentation for the open-source version. 

Considering the load we had at the time, which was low, it was stable.

We expect that better documentation would help when it comes to scaling this solution.

Currently, the volume is low, with less than one hundred users.

We did not have technical support, although we found that community support was good enough to fulfill our needs.

The initial setup of this solution was simple.

The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge.

My advice for anybody who is implementing this solution is to start with a proof of concept project. That will allow them to properly scale it or benchmark it for their internal capacity.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for integration between core banking and other systems.

The solution provides a way to communicate with unknown software with standard flexibility. Normally, we did not have good service integration with multiple systems and it provided this functionality, which is good.

The most valuable aspect of the solution is the integration between core banking and other systems.

There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced.

The stability is excellent.

I wasn't able to check the scalability or test it very well previously, but I just tried it for about 1,000 transactions per minute, for testing, that it runs smoothly with no issue. We typically have a lower amount of transactions than that. Its use is not extensive.

We haven't used technical support.

We didn't previously use another solution. I was on the search for an open-source solution in order to have the ability to change or amend settings. 

The latest version remains very complex, although it's going to wizard. The information is very easy for handling the integration. The initial version we used had some complications but it's handled now. The deployment didn't take more than an hour. We only needed two people to implement the solution - an admin and a developer. For maintenance, we only need the admin.

We handled the implementation ourselves.

We don't use the cloud version; we have our own servers.

I would rate this solution eight out of ten.