SnapLogic vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

"The solution could improve its API management."

"SnapLogic is an IPA tool that leverages a low code environment to connect to multiple sources, extract data, and store it in Azure data lake."

"It's more developer-friendly, and development can be done at a faster phase."

"They are very good at building out new aspects according to customer requirements."

"SnapLogic is a great platform for establishing integrations among various systems or patterns by using any kind of interface. If something is not supported by predefined snaps – snaps are connectors in SnapLogic – you can create them (custom snaps) or write a script."

"SnapLogice is a low-code development tool."

"The API architecture makes it easy for orchestration."

"The product is easy to use and has many connectivity options."

"The learning curve for this solution is very good."

"Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things."

"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."

"The drag-and-drop features for connectors are very valuable."

"The installation process is easy."

"The solution's customer service is good."

"In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users."

"The solution basically conforms to our standards."

"Connecting to data behind enterprise firewalls has been tricky."

"One area for improvement in SnapLogic is the transparency in the flow of data. It needs to have more transparency. Right now, users only have a preview option at the end of any job flow, so at the end of any Snap Pack, there is a data preview option that lets you review the data and see how it's moving. What would make the solution better is more debugging and more access to change data from the preview panel or more functionality in terms of the preview option."

"What could be improved in SnapLogic is that it was not capable in terms of processing a large number of datasets, but at that point, SnapLogic was evolving. It didn't give a lot of Snaps. I heard recently there are a lot of Snaps getting added and the solution was being enhanced, particularly to connect different data sources. When I was working with SnapLogic six months to one year back, I faced the issue of it not being capable of handling a huge volume of datasets or didn't have much of Snaps, and that was the drawback. If there is any large number of data sets, that's based on or depends on your configuration. If it is a huge volume of data, other traditional ETL tools such as Informatica and Talend can process millions and billions of records, while in SnapLogic, the Snaplex fails or it returns an error in terms of processing that huge volume of data. Informatica, Talend, or any other ETL tool can run for hours in terms of jobs, while SnapLogic jobs fail when the threshold is reached. SnapLogic isn't able to withstand processing, but I don't know if that's still an issue at present, because the solution is getting enhanced and it's been more than six months to one year since I last worked with SnapLogic. There are now a lot of Snaps getting added to the solution, and if it can overcome the limitations I mentioned, SnapLogic could be the go-to tool because currently, it's not being used as much in organizations. It's being used comparatively less compared to other retail tools."

"SnapLogic should have some inbuilt protocol mechanism in order to speed up."

"I would like to see more performance-related dashboards, ones that display the cost of a pipeline, for instance. Also, it would be helpful to have management dashboards for overseeing pipelines and connections."

"SnapLogic sits somewhere in the middle. It doesn’t offer enough easy canned integrations for its users like some of the easier to use integration apps."

"They should expand in terms of features for SaaS-based market requirements in different sectors."

"It needs some more snaps. I would like to see some of the features be changed in some of the snaps."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."

"If I have to buy software, then it becomes expensive for me."

"In my opinion, the administration model and interface, of Carbon, are lacking in terms of its features and user experience."

"I would like to see better documentation for the open-source version."

"The integration capabilities need to be improved."

"They should release upgrades more frequently."

"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."

"The cost with SnapLogic is an annual license and better than Informatica."

"I used the free trial."

"They have pricing/usage tiers that are easy to move up or down."

"It is a higher initial cost than other easy-to-use integration apps."

"SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."

"When comparing it with solutions like Apigee or MuleSoft, it still offers better value."

"The license model is based on consumption."

"From the ROI perspective, the price is extremely high"

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

"It is a low-cost solution."

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."