Ubuntu Linux Reviews

I use Ubuntu Linux 22.04 LTS for website hosting and for application stacks like Apache and MySQL. I am using Ubuntu Linux 22.04 LTS for hosting my website, and for the database, I use MySQL to host the application and get the response from the MySQL database.

I use Ubuntu Linux in different fields including cloud and virtualization, containerization, database management, file and network sharing, and development and DevOps. I use Ubuntu Linux for my AWS application, as Ubuntu Linux Server is used for heavily utilized hosting websites, databases, and cloud applications.

The best feature of Ubuntu Linux is that it serves as a base for private cloud and public cloud VMs for AWS.

It is very useful to use Ubuntu Linux with its GUI-based and CLI modes; the commands are very lightweight, and it is much more feasible for me with its long-term support.

Ubuntu Linux provides business advisory consultancy for business purposes and enables the smooth running of my website hosting to meet all business purposes.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is good because I am using the freeware version.

The user experience on Ubuntu Linux is very good, so I believe there is no need for improvement.

I have been using Ubuntu Linux for the last five years.

Ubuntu Linux is definitely stable.

Ubuntu Linux is widely used for business purposes including app storage, development, and staging environments. From my perspective as a user, I would rate Linux at eight points for its high scalability and greater relevance and advantage in terms of adherence, cost-saving, desktop compatibility, cloud server dominance, and wide industry adoption. I believe it is good for new users as well as for experienced people.

Customer support for Ubuntu Linux was very good.

Before Ubuntu Linux, I was using Windows applications for application purposes. However, because of its lightweight and user-friendly environment, I am now using Ubuntu Linux 22.04 LTS for all relevant business purposes.

Ubuntu Linux Pro version provides 20 years of security maintenance, including kernel patching and compliance with standards such as FIPS and CIS, making it cost-effective. It is open-source and free, which is already beneficial for business purposes and for running any environment.

I have reduced staff because I am using a centralized server to manage it with Ubuntu Linux.

By using Ubuntu Linux on the cloud, I am reducing costs by at least 22 percent by providing a feasible and secure environment.

I was not using another solution. I am new to this environment, so this is very relevant based on my experience.

I would rate Ubuntu Linux an eight.

I provide the rating of eight because Ubuntu Linux is heavily used for business purposes with different benefits. For example, private users and small businesses can register, and the Hardy Heron release in April has led to wide industry adoption, server dominance, cloud, desktop compatibility, cost savings, and management tools.

I deploy Ubuntu Linux on an on-premises cloud as well as AWS public cloud. I use Amazon Web Services, the AWS cloud, for my public cloud deployment.

My overall review rating for Ubuntu Linux is eight out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

I use Ubuntu Linux to send text messages and error logs from a server. I employ it for everything, from processing video to a variety of tasks. It is used practically for anything.

Ubuntu Linux is extremely stable, rock solid, and reliable. It can run for years without issues, providing peace of mind from a stability perspective. For any backend processing server, I would use it as long as the hardware is reliable because the operating system will just work. Red Hat Linux, a commercial suite, is also very stable and runs consistently. Ubuntu Linux's security and package management tools are excellent.

Linux sees improvements each year, with new releases introducing features to enhance functionality. While I do not find any issues myself, others might, which leads to regular enhancements. There is a push towards integrating AI into software for various purposes like video and sound processing. The market continuously offers new developments, with AI being a prominent focus.

I have been working with Linux for twenty to twenty-five years.

Ubuntu Linux is extremely stable and maintains uptime effectively. It is ideal for backend processing because of its reliability, provided the hardware is functional.

I contacted Red Hat technical support around six years ago due to a problem I was encountering. They responded well, understood that the issue was not on my end, and provided a patch within two days. It was a positive experience with their support.

Neutral

I have done the deployment hundreds of times, and it is easy for me. It typically takes an hour to an hour and a half.

New features in Linux always bring enhancements, and there is a current trend towards AI integration. I have not yet embarked on any AI or machine learning projects with Ubuntu Linux, but I may explore them later. If systems remain operational, I do not face losses; however, if they fail, the potential loss of money is significant. I rate Ubuntu Linux ten all the way. On a scale of 1 to 10, I rate the overall solution a 10.

On-premises

I primarily use Ubuntu Linux for programming in embedded systems. My laptop runs Ubuntu Linux, and I have installed various IDEs and open-source software on it. For microcontroller programming, I utilize AVR and STM32. In addition, I design electronic circuit boards using KiCad.

Ubuntu Linux is lightweight, fast, and works seamlessly with command-line terminals. It is resource-saving and suitable for automation through scripting. Additionally, Ubuntu Linux's open-source nature supports community contributions, bolstering its development and support ecosystem. This flexibility allows for efficient programming and integration with various devices.

While Ubuntu Linux offers flexibility, it can lack support, especially when utilizing new versions. Stability issues occur when integrating new components due to physical or technical challenges. Additionally, I would like to see more flexibility in integrating Ubuntu Linux with newer devices, particularly in terms of CPU performance, RAM upgrades, and power-saving features.

I have been using Ubuntu Linux every day for over three years.

I face no significant challenges during Ubuntu Linux deployment. For example, setting up Ubuntu Linux on a Raspberry Pi involves a simple process of copying Linux onto an SD card, which takes about five minutes. However, configuring Ubuntu Linux for a server setup can be more complex and time-consuming, requiring up to a week.

Ubuntu Linux is generally stable, though there can be occasional issues with new hardware integration. Previously, I encountered downtime due to a new switch core integration, which resulted from physical cable problems rather than software issues.

Ubuntu Linux is scalable. In a server environment, it can seamlessly adapt to increased customer demand. Alarms help monitor resource usage, allowing for timely responses to scaling needs.

I utilize community resources and ChatGPT for support. The community around Ubuntu Linux is beneficial, providing answers to questions and assisting with issues.

Neutral

I have previously used Windows. Windows is a closed system, which makes flexibility and integration with various devices challenging compared to the more flexible open-source nature of Ubuntu Linux.

Ubuntu Linux setup is straightforward, with documented guidelines. It includes backing up systems regularly, automating processes through scripts, and ensuring stable configurations for different use cases.

Ubuntu Linux is open-source, leading to cost savings through its free availability. Its resource efficiency further reduces costs by optimizing system performance.

During discussions, I've worked with both Windows and Ubuntu Linux, comparing their features and capabilities.

I recommend using Ubuntu Linux for its faster processing capabilities and lightweight nature. Ubuntu Linux is ideal for tasks demanding high performance and flexibility. It's highly customizable, making it suitable for a wide range of applications, from server environments to embedded systems. My overall rating for Ubuntu Linux is eight.

On-premises

Other

I use it for self-service applications, containerization, security, and backup. There are so many use cases; I can't mention everything.

I find the terminal valuable for pasting some commands and using some software as well. It's probably called a terminal and shell environment.

There's nothing more to improve. I would just continue developing the functionality that is already implemented, maybe with more graphical implementation inside the OS. 

Additionally, a more secure implementation would be good.

I have used it for many years, maybe ten-plus.

There were stability issues at specific times.

Scalability is not key, however, I have to practice using it correctly.

I have also used macOS, Windows 2, Windows Server, Fedora, and many more. I find it more efficient than other systems, but I have to do what I want to do myself.

Initially, there was nothing complicated. It's easy since I have many years of experience with it. However, if I were a beginner with Linux, it could be completely disruptive compared to Windows. So, I would have to spend some time practicing with Linux to understand how it works and how I can accomplish the same tasks compared to Windows. Maybe one month, at least.

The setup cost is free.

Overall, I rate this solution ten out of ten.

Ubuntu Linux is my operating system for daily use, and because I am related to networking operations, I prefer Linux over Windows. The FortiClient in Windows is very limiting and the IT department most of the time doesn't know how to open certain ports or are very limited in their skills with FortiClient, so I have more freedom to open ports and run some services with it.

One of the best features of Ubuntu Linux is that if I need something, I just download it. Everything I need I could search for on the net and just download it and use it, whereas Windows is more problematic.

Ubuntu Linux's rapid support and extensive documentation are fine to me. Every time I need to do something, I find well-explained documentation about the process, so I have no complaints about the documentation or the info about how to do it.

I always use just the LTS versions of Ubuntu Linux, but I found recently some software that needs the 20.04 version, which is out of the support lifecycle, and those systems are needed by us, causing a problem when I tried to upgrade. The systems stopped working and it was a disaster, as they support the LTS but the old ones, and when I need to update some packages, they are out of the support system support cycle.

I have used Ubuntu Linux for maybe 12 years.

I have never rated the support or customer service of Ubuntu Linux as I have never used it.

Positive

My experience with the pricing for Ubuntu Linux is that I always use the free version, so I never paid for any installations or support.

I have not used Ubuntu Linux's cloud-init capabilities for configuring or managing instances in cloud environments.

I don't know of any things that could be better with Ubuntu Linux, as everything works fine.

On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Ubuntu Linux a 10 plus.

On-premises

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Most of our customers use Ubuntu Linux to host their websites. We configure Apache or Nginx and troubleshoot them. If their applications are down, we check the servers. If the server goes down or there is an issue, we look into them.

Ubuntu Linux is user-friendly through the command line. The packages inside the repository are built-in, which allows for easy installation from the server environment without relying on third-party applications. Additionally, Ubuntu Linux supports remote troubleshooting via SSH, allowing connection from anywhere, which is beneficial for troubleshooting server issues.

We face minor issues with the regular upgrade; manual upgrades are required. There have been network configuration issues, specifically with netplan.yaml. Unlike CentOS, Ubuntu Linux lacks an easily accessible inbuilt repository where dependencies or packages are easily found.

I have been working with Ubuntu Linux for about one and a half years.

Deploying on-premises can take about twenty minutes, but with a good network, it can be faster. For cloud deployments via our jump servers, it takes less than ten minutes.

I have had no issues with the stability of Ubuntu Linux.

I find Ubuntu Linux scalable with no complaints.

The support can be tough as immediate answers are not always available. However, Ubuntu Linux has a comprehensive knowledge base for self-help.

Positive

We have experience using CentOS. It allows direct root login, offering root privileges immediately.

The initial setup of Ubuntu Linux is easy.

The cost is not much, and I am not sure about the licensing cost because a separate team handles it.

We have used CentOS and are familiar with it.

I would recommend using Ubuntu Linux as it is easy to handle. The biggest benefit is the ability to connect through SSH for remote troubleshooting. My total rating for Ubuntu Linux is ten out of ten.

On-premises

Other

Can you describe some of the use cases for this product and where or how it is used?

What are some of the most valuable features in your opinion with Ubuntu Linux?

What areas could be improved with Ubuntu Linux in your opinion?

Where can they continue to improve and where can they focus their energy moving forward regarding improvements?

Since you mentioned it was easy to install, how long does it take to deploy the product?

Can one person complete the deployment?

How would you rate their customer service or the technical support with Ubuntu Linux? Have you ever used it?

There is substantial documentation and community support available.

What would you say are some main differences between Ubuntu Linux and other Linux products that you have used?

Are you the only one who is maintaining it, or how many people maintain the product?

Can you describe any cost savings or productivity boosts you have realized by using Ubuntu Linux?

What are your thoughts on how Ubuntu Linux is priced?

Is CentOS something you used recently in the last year?

Do you still have experience with Windows and Linux products?

Which Linux products are you familiar with? Is it Ubuntu Linux, SUSE, Rocky, or some others?

Does it require a lot of maintenance?

How does Ubuntu Linux support your AI or machine learning projects?

Would you recommend Ubuntu Linux to others and why?

We can use the solution for browsing. We can also use it as a server and deploy and configure it as a file or web server. The use case depends on the user. I use it to deploy something which I want to test out. If I have to test out ELK Stack, I might use Ubuntu because it’s free.

The GUI is user-friendly.

The solution must provide more integrations.

I have been using the solution from time to time whenever I require it.

I rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten.

I am using the solution for my personal needs. It is possible to increase the number of users depending on who uses it.

I have used Windows. I use Ubuntu only for testing purposes. Some things can only be tested on Linux.

The initial setup is straightforward. It takes 15 to 30 minutes to deploy the OS. The product can be used on the cloud as well. However, I have deployed it on my own laptop.

I deployed the solution myself. We have to follow the standard OS deployment process to deploy the tool. We do not need any consultation. We might need a live CD, or we can download the image from the Internet. We can boot from the USB and just follow the instructions. It will be deployed.

There is no licensing cost for the product.

Ubuntu improves its products every year. Earlier, the GUI was not good, so Ubuntu improved it. They have removed the complexity of the software. My recommendation depends on people’s use cases. If someone wants to test something that is more stable on Ubuntu, they can use the solution. They can use other Linux flavors like Red Hat, too. Overall, I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten.

On-premises

I have been using Ubuntu Linux as the primary operating system for our developers and many people we work with.

Ubuntu Linux is the most secure option on the market. For business-focused people, a Mac is preferred, but for developers, Ubuntu Linux is better. Ubuntu Linux's good desktop experience makes it easy to use even if you are not comfortable using the command line. It has excellent integration with development tools, including CI/CD and Atlassian products. Most of our code development occurs on Ubuntu Linux, and it integrates deeply with development pipelines, making it straightforward to manage. Additionally, Ubuntu Linux's parent company provides canonical pipelining for machine learning, ensuring compatibility and efficiency.

In the past, OpenOffice was a pain point on the Ubuntu Linux side, but now, because everything has moved to online platforms like Google Cloud or Microsoft Cloud, it's not a problem anymore.

I have been working with Ubuntu Linux for approximately fifteen years.

Ubuntu Linux is very stable. It works as expected without any major issues.

I have not contacted Ubuntu Linux directly. We had some communication through a customer where the canonical product was considered for machine learning, but not directly.

Neutral

We are a no Windows company, using Mac or Ubuntu Linux only.

I have deployed Ubuntu Linux hundreds of times. It can take from an hour to a few days depending on the server. However, scaling is straightforward without any issues.

Keep my review anonymous. I rate Ubuntu Linux as a ten out of ten; it's a perfect tool with no issues. The overall solution is rated ten out of ten.

On-premises

We use the solution as a backend production server. We run our Docker containers on Ubuntu. We mainly use it for automotive charging software.

The product is easy to use. I like the tool’s performance and availability.

The product must provide integrated security solutions. I use third-party security solutions now.

I have been using the solution for two to four years.

Currently, we are trying to implement our solution with the Kubernetes environment. We need horizontal scalability, not vertical. When we need more capacity, we add another server and distribute the load onto the new server.

We do not use support because the answers in the community forums are enough for us. If we gain more customers in the future, we might need support.

We were using Windows before. I like Ubuntu’s performance compared to Windows.

The setup is really straightforward. It is not complex. We develop DevOps scripts to deploy it. It takes only one or two hours. If the hardware is available, then it will take only one hour. We prepare the hardware environment and deploy the solution. After that, we deploy the Docker container environment. Then, we run the whole software. The product is deployed on-premises because we are still in the testing phase. We have a small number of customers. In the future, we will try to migrate to the cloud.

The product is cheap compared to Windows. We pay a yearly license fee. I rate the pricing a four out of ten.

I do my job directly on the terminal server. Ubuntu is a good choice. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

On-premises