Tenable Vulnerability Management Reviews

Tenable Vulnerability Management often yields a good ROI by identifying vulnerabilities and improving visibility. Many find it cost-effective as it prevents costly breaches, although some have not tracked or seen measurable returns. Automatically reducing operational expenses is beneficial, and users rate its ROI positively. While one sees no return, others note that identifying issues early is cheaper than post-incident management, enhancing their vulnerability management programs despite no specific cost analysis done.

Tenable Vulnerability Management's pricing is perceived as high by many users, with costs influenced by the number of assets and additional features. Annual licenses range from $2,300 to over $137,000 based on usage. Some users find the pricing reasonable, while others suggest it is mid to high range compared to competitors. There are no hidden fees for basic vulnerability management, but extending features incurs extra costs. A pay-as-you-go model could improve its appeal.

• "Tenable charges around $40 per device."
• "The product costs us around $137,000 annually for 4000 to 5000 assets."
• "I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It is in the middle."

Organizations use Tenable Vulnerability Management primarily for in-depth vulnerability scanning and asset management across cloud and on-premises environments. It aids in discovering vulnerabilities within IT infrastructures, assessing threats, and improving security posture. Users implement it for network scans, compliance reporting, and external vulnerability monitoring. Providing a user-friendly interface, it offers centralized access, enhancing vulnerability assessment and remediation strategies. Its integration with other systems often supports comprehensive cybersecurity initiatives.

Tenable Vulnerability Management receives mixed feedback on its customer service and support. While some find the support team responsive and knowledgeable, others experience slow response times and difficulties in handling complex issues. Escalation often improves outcomes, but faster resolutions and better customer interaction are desired. Availability varies with location, emphasizing a need for a locally-based team. Some customers find the extra charge for support services to be a hindrance. Ratings range from two to ten out of ten.

Tenable Vulnerability Management's initial setup is described as straightforward and uncomplicated. It can be completed quickly, often taking only a few hours or days, depending on the deployment environment. Users highlight the ease of configuration and access, with a minimal team required for deployment. Challenges may arise with specific environments like AWS or when migrating large datasets. Training courses are available to assist users, making entry easier for those unfamiliar with the platform.

Tenable Vulnerability Management is highly scalable, managing thousands of assets with ease. Companies in sectors like finance and public enterprises find it adaptable to their needs. Licensing can pose challenges in scaling, but the cloud-based nature allows easy expansion. Although costs can increase with scaling needs, most find the process straightforward. Ratings often fall between seven and ten for scalability, indicating strong performance in supporting variable user and asset numbers.

Tenable Vulnerability Management is widely recognized as stable, with users consistently reporting minimal issues such as crashes, freezes, or glitches. Many describe it as very reliable and commend its performance across various environments. Some encountered occasional downtimes or scan-related challenges, but these instances are rare. Users appreciate its overall dependability and strong stability credentials, often rating it highly compared to competitors.