We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."Our static operation security has been able to identify more security issues since implementing this solution."
"The UI is very intuitive and simple to use."
"Less false positive errors as compared to any other solution."
"We use the solution to validate the source code and do SAST and security analysis."
"Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%."
"The solution communicates where to fix the issue for the purpose of less iterations."
"The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things. It also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."
"The solution has good performance, it is able to compute in 10 to 15 minutes."
"A new user can easily understand the workflow, even if they are creating users for other divisions and the user is a beginner."
"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."
"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."
"The price of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is reasonable as it is ten times cheaper than other options."
"It is easy to manage. Most of the information the tool provided helped to further investigate the vulnerability and its impact."
"Tenable.io, in particular, is quite a powerful product. It looks at your traditional environment, which is pretty much anything that is on-premises, and it also goes a step ahead and covers your modern assets, which is anything that is currently sitting in the cloud. You get complete visibility of your entire environment and tech operation. The ability to give you visibility across the entire tech surface is one of the biggest advantages that Tenable.io has."
"Technical support has been good. They respond quite quickly."
"The solution is quite friendly."
"We have received some feedback from our customers who are receiving a large number of false positives."
"We would like to be able to run scans from our local system, rather than having to always connect to the product server, which is a longer process."
"The product can be improved by continuing to expand the application languages and frameworks that can be scanned for vulnerabilities. This includes expanded coverage for mobile applications as well as open-source development tools."
"Creating and editing custom rules in Checkmarx is difficult because the license for the editor comes at an additional cost, and there is a steep learning curve."
"We want to have a holistic view of the portfolio-level dashboard and not just an individual technical project level."
"In terms of dashboarding, the solution could provide a little more flexibility in terms of creating more dashboards. It has some of its own dashboards that come out of the box. However, if I have to implement my own dashboards that are aligned to my organization's requirements, that dashboarding feature has limited capability right now."
"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."
"The validation process needs to be sped up."
"Users get confused between VPR and CVSS ratings."
"The product could be easier to set up on the cloud."
"I don't recommend Tenable.io Vulnerability Management for web scanning"
"The product is a bit expensive."
"More flexibility is required compared to other solutions."
"The shortcoming of the solution that needs improvement is related to its capability to do vulnerability assessments on applications."
"The only drawback of the solution is that it is expensive."
"The UI has room for improvement."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Checkmarx One is ranked 11th in Vulnerability Management with 67 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 38 reviews. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors and best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
