Checkmarx One vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Checkmarx and Tenable are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Checkmarx is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.1, while Tenable is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.9. Checkmarx holds a 0.7% mindshare in VM, compared to Tenable’s 5.9% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Checkmarx One and Tenable Vulnerability Management are key players in the vulnerability scanning and management market. Checkmarx One holds the advantage in advanced code scanning capabilities and remediation guidance, while Tenable's strength lies in its broader vulnerability management tools and integration capabilities.

Features: Checkmarx One offers advanced code scanning without code compilation, supporting various languages and providing comprehensive analysis tools. It identifies vulnerabilities and offers remediation guidance and syntax correction, which helps developers enhance secure coding skills. Tenable Vulnerability Management provides robust vulnerability scanning with strong integration capabilities with third-party solutions, making it competitive in managing a wide range of vulnerabilities.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One needs to address false positives, expand language support, and develop a more flexible and affordable licensing model. Tenable Vulnerability Management could benefit from better integration, intuitive dashboards, and expanded reporting capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One supports multiple deployment options, including on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud, allowing flexibility for various infrastructures. While its technical support is positive, response times can be slow. Tenable Vulnerability Management offers diverse deployment options favoring public cloud availability, with customer service praised for promptness and knowledge, though improvements in response time and detailed support could enhance the experience.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is perceived as expensive due to its complex licensing model, but it promises a good ROI by reducing vulnerabilities early in development, minimizing troubleshooting costs. Tenable Vulnerability Management's pricing is seen as high, especially for SMBs, but offers reasonable ROI through comprehensive security coverage, with both needing more transparent and flexible pricing structures.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 858,649 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Zafran Security is 0.7%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Checkmarx One is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 5.9%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

Syed Hasan

Specialist Leader at Deloitte

Partner experiences excellent technical support and seamless initial setup

In my opinion, if we are able to extract or show the report, and because everything is going towards agent tech and GenAI, it would be beneficial if it could get integrated with our code base and do the fix automatically. It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from. This would be really helpful.

Read full review

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Streamlines vulnerability management with excellent reporting and potential AI integration

Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting. It allows me to easily fetch and schedule reports. The software's discovery feature aids in strengthening our security posture. The single-sensor installation process on various operating systems is smooth, unlike Rapid7, which requires different versions for separate systems. Furthermore, Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"We saw benefits from Zafran Security almost immediately after deploying it."

"Overall, we have seen about eighty-seven percent reduction of the number of vulnerabilities that require urgency to remediate, specifically the number of criticals."

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"The solution improved the efficiency of our code security reviews. It helps tremendously because it finds hundreds of potential problems sometimes."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the automation and information that it provides in the reports."

"The reports are very good because they include details on the code level, and make suggestions about how to fix the problems."

"We use the solution to validate the source code and do SAST and security analysis."

"The most valuable feature is the simple user interface."

"Checkmarx offers many valuable features, including Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), Infrastructure as Code (IAC), Supply Chain Security, and API Security."

"Scan reviews can occur during the development lifecycle."

"The SAST component was absolutely 100% stable."

More Checkmarx One pros

"The solution is quite friendly."

"The price of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is reasonable as it is ten times cheaper than other options."

"It is easy to manage. Most of the information the tool provided helped to further investigate the vulnerability and its impact."

"Tenable Vulnerability Management is the backbone of our vulnerability management and has affected my organization positively."

"Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting."

"The vulnerability management itself is the most valuable feature as well as references to the mitigation techniques."

"The initial setup is mostly straightforward."

"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pros

Cons

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements."

"I think the ability to have some enhanced reporting capabilities is something they can improve on, as they have good reports but we have asked for some specific reporting enhancements."

"They should make it more container-friendly and optimized for the CI pipeline. They should make it a little less heavy. Right now, it requires a SQL database, and the way the tool works is that it has an engine and then it has an analysis database in which it stores the information. So, it is pretty heavy from that perspective because you have to have a full SQL Server. They're working on something called Checkmarx Light, which is a slim-down version. They haven't released it yet, but that's what we need. There should be something a little more slimmed down that can just run the analysis and output the results in a format that's readable as opposed to having a full, really big, and thick deployment with a full database server."

"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."

"One area for improvement in Checkmarx is pricing, as it's more expensive than other products."

"Some were valid and some were not applicable for us based on the scenario."

"I really would like to integrate it as a service along with the SAP HANA Cloud Platform. It will then be easy to use it directly as a service."

"Checkmarx could improve the REST APIs by including automation."

"I would like to see the rate of false positives reduced."

"I expect application security vendors to cover all aspects of application security, including SAST, DAST, and even mobile application security testing. And it would be much better if they provided an on-premises and cloud option for all these main application security features."

More Checkmarx One cons

"Tenable could improve visibility into assets, including automated asset tagging. You should be able to automatically tag assets based on location, function, ownership, etc. That would help us because we spend a lot of time identifying and tagging assets by hand."

"The solution must be promoted more in the market."

"They've been able to think about everything in terms of where the world is going and the type of assets that you've got. They've everything sorted out in that aspect, but you have to pay for most of the other components that they've got to give you complete visibility across your tech surface. If it already had those capabilities in-built, without having to add them on to take advantage of them, it would be a very compelling value proposition."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"The product is a bit expensive."

"The solution must provide penetration testing."

"The pricing of the solution could be more reasonable."

"I'd like to see them improve their support."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"For around 250 users or committers, the cost is approximately $500,000."

"It is a good product but a little overpriced."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."

"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."

"The average deal size was usually anywhere between $120K to $175K on an annual basis, which could be divided across 12 months."

"Be cautious of the one-year subscription date. Once it expires, your price will go up."

"Most of my customers opted for a perpetual license. They prefer to pay the highest amount up front for the perpetual license and then pay for additional support annually."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"Tenable charges around $40 per device."

"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It is in the middle."

"The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."

"Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management's pricing solution model isn't great."

"Yearly payments are to be made toward the licensing cost of the product. It is neither a cheap nor an expensive product."

"The product costs us around $137,000 annually for 4000 to 5000 assets."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

858,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

The current pricing of Zafran Security is fair overall. They were good to work with to accommodate our organization w...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvement...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

Zafran Security is helping reduce the amount of critical vulnerabilities in our environments that require prompt reme...

See all answers

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

The tool has an easy-to-use interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

I would suggest HP WebInspect as a better option than Tenable.io. My current client doesn't have access to it. Howeve...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 41% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 17% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Zafran Security

Compared 10% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Zafran Security

Compared 6% of the time

Nucleus vs Zafran Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 36% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 20% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 5% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

June 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

June 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Vulnerability Management

May 2025

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tenable.io

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Global Payments AU/NZ

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

May 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

858,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors and best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.