We performed a comparison between GitHub CoPilot and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is easy to integrate."
"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates."
"The initial setup of the product is easy."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"It is much easier to develop applications with the product’s IDE."
"We used almost all of the features, themes, styling guide, and approach components. They are useful in our applications."
"We have no complaints surrounding both the scalability and stability of this solution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it allows users to easily build applications."
"The tool makes the development process easier."
"OutSystems' low-cost approach has positively impacted our productivity, because we were able to develop faster with OutSystems, enabling us to implement many changes during our sprint."
"We can do the validation before calling the API."
"Once built, web/mobile components can be reused in all new developments. In addition, the OutSystems Forge is very useful. We can exchange components and even already-built applications, reducing costs to build specific solutions."
"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages."
"GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results."
"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I have difficulty in using several new features. Some of the product's features are tricky to use as well."
"In my opinion, the support and the pricing could be better."
"Its ability to create and run automated tasks could be better."
"I would like to see improvements in versioning. It can be challenging to keep track of what changes should be committed, especially when many developers are working in one environment."
"The prices should be lower. It is a little bit too high for a small market."
"I would like to see OutSystems improve its integration capabilities, especially with emerging technologies like AI and GPT."
"Currently, in mobile applications, we don't have push notifications."
"The product could be improved if there was a shortcut, or predefined, predictable templates provided."
GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 10 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Rapid Application Development Software with 46 reviews. GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.4, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "Useful natural speech to algorithm, reliable, and beneficial automatic task". GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Pega BPM, ServiceNow and Adobe ColdFusion, whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and AgilePoint. See our GitHub CoPilot vs. OutSystems report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.