Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
3.7 out of 5

What is OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web?

Featured OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web mindshare

Product category:
As of August 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web in the Mobile App Testing Tools category stands at 3.3%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile App Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryMobile App Testing ToolsAug 1, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 1, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Tricentis ToscaAug 1, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs OpenText Functional TestingAug 1, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs UiPath Test CloudAug 1, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Tricentis Tosca4.133.4%96%111 interviewsAdd to research
OpenText Functional Testing4.021.9%87%97 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
17%
Non Profit
10%
Educational Organization
6%
Retailer
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Performing Arts
4%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Government
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Construction Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
University
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Comms Service Provider
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Security Firm
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%

Compare OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web with alternative products

Learn more about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web customers

Related questions

 

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

Sort by:
PeerSpot user
Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Jul 23, 2025
Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

Cons

"OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web could benefit from implementing a low-code, no-code solution that aids in quick automation code preparation."
Robinson Caiado - PeerSpot user
Sales Leader at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Verified user of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Jul 31, 2024
Automates mobile solutions while boosting productivity and fostering innovation
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web. Updated July 2025
864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.
JV
Technical director at Dugson.Consulting
Verified user of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Oct 3, 2023
Robust solution for application lifecycle management with numerous valuable features

Pros

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps. "

Cons

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."
Aditya Dhope - PeerSpot user
Software Engineer at KPIT Technologies
Verified user of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Apr 5, 2024
The record and playback option helps users deal with object detection

Pros

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

Cons

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."
Arno Krause - PeerSpot user
Solutions Architect at MTN
Verified user of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Aug 25, 2023
Easy-to-use product with helpful technical support team

Pros

"The product is easy to use. "

Cons

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."
Robinson Caiado Guimarães - PeerSpot user
Sales Leader at Better Now
Verified user of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Aug 16, 2023
An easy to use solution that helps to orchestrate mobile testing

Pros

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time. "

Cons

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it. "
PeerSpot user
Responsible for Test Management at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Oct 7, 2019
Easy to use and has good virtualization capability

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

Cons

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."
PeerSpot user
Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Sep 13, 2019
Enables users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators

Pros

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

Cons

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."