Discover the top alternatives and competitors to OpenText Network Automation based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Cisco DNA Center, and VMware NSX.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
OpenText Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform excels in support and pricing satisfaction, appealing to budget-conscious enterprises. In comparison, OpenText Network Automation attracts buyers with superior features and network-specific functionalities, especially those needing advanced management and analytics, justifying its higher investment.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform presents a setup cost that can vary depending on the scale, while OpenText Network Automation typically involves a more straightforward setup fee structure, highlighting significant pricing structure differences between the two platforms.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform presents a setup cost that can vary depending on the scale, while OpenText Network Automation typically involves a more straightforward setup fee structure, highlighting significant pricing structure differences between the two platforms.
OpenText Network Automation offers advanced automation and integration flexibility, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center provides comprehensive network policy management and AI-driven insights, attracting those seeking robust features and security, despite higher initial costs.
VMware NSX is preferred for its strong network virtualization and scalability, appealing to complex infrastructure needs. In comparison, OpenText Network Automation excels with advanced automation and orchestration, offering a cost-effective solution with streamlined deployment and responsive customer service, reducing operational overhead.
VMware NSX generally has higher setup costs due to complex configuration needs, while OpenText Network Automation is more budget-friendly with straightforward setup.
VMware NSX generally has higher setup costs due to complex configuration needs, while OpenText Network Automation is more budget-friendly with straightforward setup.
OpenText Network Automation attracts tech buyers with cost-effectiveness and strong support services. In comparison, NetBrain appeals to those seeking advanced features like dynamic network mapping, offering higher ROI despite higher setup costs, making it suitable for complex network environments requiring deep insights and rapid response.
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager excels in change management and compliance for efficient network operations, appealing to smaller budgets. In comparison, OpenText Network Automation offers scalability and advanced features, attracting enterprises seeking integration with diverse IT systems for long-term automation advantages.
NetBox.dev is utilized for network management offering features like IP address tracking and device management. Users appreciate its extensive customization and open-source nature. However, there is room to improve documentation and streamline navigation for easier access to various tools and features.
OpenText Network Automation is favored for its cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, offering straightforward task automation and compliance management. In comparison, BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks provides robust functionality with advanced features suited for complex network environments, despite a more intricate deployment process.
OpenText Network Automation has a lower setup cost, providing a cost-effective solution compared to BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks, which requires a higher initial investment. This difference makes OpenText more accessible for organizations with budget constraints.
OpenText Network Automation has a lower setup cost, providing a cost-effective solution compared to BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks, which requires a higher initial investment. This difference makes OpenText more accessible for organizations with budget constraints.
BackBox brings powerful automation to help free people by removing complexity from network management. BackBox also creates a central backup of network device configurations with one-click recovery to help ensure high availability resilience.
