Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager pros and cons

Technical support has been helpful.

The stability overall has been pretty great.

It provides all of the robust platform-enabled features.

The solution has been very stable.

MuleSoft has given the API solution a 3-tiered architecture. This means that there are multiple channels available in one application. The usability is very high.

When using the Mulesoft Anypoint Platform, it has a wide range of connectors that are readily available to connect with the multiple applications.

The entire offering and suite of tools that this solution provides have been very valuable. We are able to manage APIs on runtime on a cloud basis which has been very useful.

Its best feature is that its plugins are somewhat unique in the market. We have budgets, Prime membership, and pre-plugins available in the marketplace that we can use immediately.

The scalability is good. It's passable.

The most valuable feature of Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is the gateway that is provided.

The initial setup, if you go back three or three and a half years, definitely, for us, was complex.

We find that the enterprise level is lacking scalability.

When compared to other integration technologies, it is slightly higher.

Their analytics needs a lot of improvement. It's really lacking right now.

MuleSoft has advanced features but is slower.

Migrating any existing middleware platform to Mulesoft is difficult because of the transformation, conversion and integration involved. Better tools are needed to achieve quicker time to market.

The log management for this solution needs improvement.

Their studio performance is very slow, it requires a lot of memory, and should be improved.

The pricing is a bit expensive.

Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager can improve some of the gateway features. We could use some more customization in creating rules. A lot of the policies are related to the APIs rather than the client. If I want to apply a policy based on a client that is not available.