Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Reviews

We use Kaspersky for our cash machines, 200 of which we have around the country. We use it to control the USB ports so nobody can use them without authorization from the owner. 

Currently, we implementing a new use case concerning our response when we get an alert.

In the past year, many banks have seen cases of ATM looting. We wanted to prevent that, which is why we implemented Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. We are a bank and we haven't had any issues like the orders. Kaspersky helped us a lot. It helped up prevent unauthorized USB port usage. 

I would like to integrate Kaspersky with my Log Collector SIEM. Right now that's not possible. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response could also introduce a way to make working in teams more accessible. At the same time, it would be interesting to see them explore artificial intelligence solutions. 

I have been using this solution for two years. 

My impression of the stability of this solution is good. We have not had any issues with stability. 

We have not had any performance issues and our board really likes the solution. Our facility and technical support teams use this solution as they manage the cash machines. 

I think they are good and we haven't had any problems with them. We haven't had any critical issues that would have required us to call the US technical support of US; we have only been in touch with local technical support.

We previously used Sophos, Crowdstrike, and Microsoft Defender. The most important reason we transitioned to Kaspersky is the agent that is installed in the end points on the cash machine. The Kaspersky agent is really soft. With the others, we noticed that their agents would stop, so that made a big difference.

We used three or four people to deploy and maintain the solution. 

Our current monthly costs are $1,000. 

You have to be really informed about the process of using this tool before deploying. With our use case with the cash machines, for example, implementing the white list could have been really hard work for us if we had not had previous experience with it.

We primarily use the solution for our servers. It's for security.

We enjoy the solution as, when we are online we are secure. It's easy to use and not too heavy. It doesn't slow down any machines at all. 

The product is quite stable.

It's scalable enough for us.

The product is straightforward to set up. 

There could be more secure.

The prices can go down a little bit.

I've used the solution for quite some time. It might have been six years at this point. 

It's a stable product. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

We find the product to be scalable. You can expand it if you need to.

We have five people using it in our organization. 

We've never contacted technical support. We've never had an issue. It works the way we need it to and we've never had a problem.

We started with Kaspersky. We didn't use a different solution previously.

The initial setup was straightforward. We are a tech company and therefore we found it pretty simple. Even a layman, however, can do the installation. It's not complex or difficult. We deployed it with our engineers. 

We handled the setup ourselves. We didn't need the help of any consultants or integrators. 

We'd like the pricing to be lower. It can get a bit pricey.

We pay for an annual license.

As a cloud solution, we're always on the latest version. We update it automatically on the cloud.

I'd recommend the solution to others. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. There's room for improvement, however, we've largely been happy with it. 

The solution is great for customers who would like to secure their endpoints and provide protection for users. It's based on the RFP response, actually, our customer reference.

The simplicity is great

It's a very light product. 

We've found the solution to be stable.

It's scalable and easy to expand.

The installation process is very simple. 

Symantec is a better option. Kaspersky needs to strengthen its standing in the market.

It would be ideal if they could make it even easier to use.

I've been using the solution for maybe five years at this point. 

The stability of the product is great. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

You can scale the solution if you need to. It's not difficult. 

We have 15 users on the solution currently.

I've never directly contacted technical support. I cannot speak to how helpful they would be.

We sometimes deal with Symantec or FireEye, depending on the requirements. 

The solution is easy to set up. It's not a difficult process. That said, I didn't do the installation myself and therefore cannot speak on how long the deployment took. 

Our engineers handled the installation process. 

We pay a monthly licensing fee. 

I would recommend the solution to others. It's been good so far. 

I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten.

I use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for security protection for our endpoints for the users.

There is a problem with the solution, it came from Russia and we are looking for a replacement.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for approximately two years.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is a stable solution.

I have found Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response not to be scalable.

We have approximately 700 users using the solution. We do not have plans to increase usage. We are looking to switch solutions.

We were using Panda Antivirus previously.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response's initial installation were straightforward. To installation of the solution on the end-users systems takes 10 minutes. However, from the console, it is a little more time, approximately two days to configure.

We only needed one person for the implementation and support of the solution. We had some support hours from the vendor if needed.

We were on a three-year license to use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. The price could be better.

I would not recommend this solution to others. We are moving to different solutions.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response an eight out of ten.

Kaspersky is useful for detecting zero-day attacks. It's signature-based and we get regular updates from the cloud.

Kaspersky is easy to use, and it performs well. 

I'd like to see more seamless integration with the cloud and other products as well as improvements to Kaspersky's sandboxing features. 

I've been working with Kaspersky EDR for a few years now.

Kaspersky is stable and scalable. 

Kaspersky support is good. 

Installing Kaspersky is complex. It requires more work from system admins and takes almost one week to deploy, including integration and mapping with other solutions. You also have to configure Kaspersky EDR sandboxing then set up permissions for various teams and customers. 

Kaspersky is licensed on a yearly basis.

I rate Kaspersky EDR seven out of ten. I usually recommended other solutions because Kaspersky is more difficult to implement. I only deploy it when the customer requires Kaspersky. But Kaspersky requires more labor from the technical team to install and implement.

We use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for the protection of our system from the internet, firewall, malware, and viruses.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is an effective protection solution.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is very heavy on the system resources. It uses a lot of memory and the system can become slow.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for approximately two years.

The stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is good.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is a scalable solution.

We do not plan to increase usage.

I have not used technical support. The solution is simple to use, they provide the tools that we need. However, the support is readily available if I need them.

The installation of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response was simple and fast. It only takes approximately seven minutes.

I did the implementation myself.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response a nine out of ten.

We are a solution provider and Kaspersky EDR is one of the products that we implement for our customers as part of their overall security.

This is a feature-rich product.

There should be options in the UI to better assist with troubleshooting problems that occur during deployment.

I would like to see a more simplified view of the configuration options.

The technical support team should respond in a more timely manner.

I have two years of experience with this product.

I have not experienced any bugs or glitches while using it.

The technical support is good. I would say that it is not bad and not excellent, but something in between. I have only opened one case with them and it took a long time for them to respond.

I am currently trying to compare Kaspersky with a similar solution by Carbon Black.

In summary, I think that Kaspersky is a good product to use.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.