We primarily use the solution for our servers. It's for security.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response OverviewUNIXBusinessApplicationPrice:
Buyer's Guide
Download the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: June 2022
What is Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?
Digitally transforming enterprises are valuable targets for cybercriminals. Today, just uncovering and blocking individual threats as they arise isn’t enough - defending yourself successfully against complex threats at the earliest possible stage requires root cause analysis. Implementing the full endpoint protection cycle, from automatic threat blocking to complex incident response, means supplementing preventive technologies with advanced defense capabilities. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) provides comprehensive visibility across all endpoints on the corporate network, enabling the automation of routine tasks in order to discover, prioritize, investigate and neutralize advanced threats. The result is a significant increase in the speed and effectiveness of incident processing, at no extra cost.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response was previously known as Kaspersky EDR.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Customers
Ferrari, Insolar, Tael, Republic of Serbia Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Video
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Pricing Advice
What users are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response pricing:
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Reviews
Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
- Date
- Highest Rating
- Lowest Rating
- Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
Information Security Officer at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Helped us prevent ATM looting
Pros and Cons
- "My impression of the stability of this solution is good. We have not had any issues with stability."
- "I would like to integrate Kaspersky with my Log Collector SIEM. Right now that's not possible."
What is our primary use case?
We use Kaspersky for our cash machines, 200 of which we have around the country. We use it to control the USB ports so nobody can use them without authorization from the owner. Currently, we implementing a new use case concerning our response when we get an alert.What is most valuable?
In the past year, many banks have seen cases of ATM looting. We wanted to prevent that, which is why we implemented Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. We are a bank and we haven't had any issues like the orders. Kaspersky helped us a lot. It helped up prevent unauthorized USB port usage.What needs improvement?
I would like to integrate Kaspersky with my Log Collector SIEM. Right now that's not possible. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response could also introduce a way to make working in teams more accessible. At the same time, it would be interesting to see them explore artificial intelligence solutions.For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for two years.Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
June 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky, Fortinet, Microsoft and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: June 2022.
609,272 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
My impression of the stability of this solution is good. We have not had any issues with stability.What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have not had any performance issues and our board really likes the solution. Our facility and technical support teams use this solution as they manage the cash machines.How are customer service and support?
I think they are good and we haven't had any problems with them. We haven't had any critical issues that would have required us to call the US technical support of US; we have only been in touch with local technical support.Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used Sophos, Crowdstrike, and Microsoft Defender. The most important reason we transitioned to Kaspersky is the agent that is installed in the end points on the cash machine. The Kaspersky agent is really soft. With the others, we noticed that their agents would stop, so that made a big difference.What about the implementation team?
We used three or four people to deploy and maintain the solution.What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Our current monthly costs are $1,000.What other advice do I have?
You have to be really informed about the process of using this tool before deploying. With our use case with the cash machines, for example, implementing the white list could have been really hard work for us if we had not had previous experience with it.Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premisesDisclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Director at Calidad Systems Limited
Easy to use, not too heavy, and straightforward to set up
Pros and Cons
- "It's scalable enough for us."
- "The prices can go down a little bit."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
We enjoy the solution as, when we are online we are secure. It's easy to use and not too heavy. It doesn't slow down any machines at all.
The product is quite stable.
It's scalable enough for us.
The product is straightforward to set up.
What needs improvement?
There could be more secure.
The prices can go down a little bit.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for quite some time. It might have been six years at this point.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a stable product. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We find the product to be scalable. You can expand it if you need to.
We have five people using it in our organization.
How are customer service and support?
We've never contacted technical support. We've never had an issue. It works the way we need it to and we've never had a problem.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We started with Kaspersky. We didn't use a different solution previously.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward. We are a tech company and therefore we found it pretty simple. Even a layman, however, can do the installation. It's not complex or difficult. We deployed it with our engineers.
What about the implementation team?
We handled the setup ourselves. We didn't need the help of any consultants or integrators.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We'd like the pricing to be lower. It can get a bit pricey.
We pay for an annual license.
What other advice do I have?
As a cloud solution, we're always on the latest version. We update it automatically on the cloud.
I'd recommend the solution to others.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. There's room for improvement, however, we've largely been happy with it.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Last updated: May 11, 2022
Flag as inappropriateBuyer's Guide
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
June 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky, Fortinet, Microsoft and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: June 2022.
609,272 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Senior Solution Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
A light, reliable product that is easy to implement
Pros and Cons
- "We've found the solution to be stable."
- "Kaspersky needs to strengthen its standing in the market."
What is our primary use case?
The solution is great for customers who would like to secure their endpoints and provide protection for users. It's based on the RFP response, actually, our customer reference.
What is most valuable?
The simplicity is great
It's a very light product.
We've found the solution to be stable.
It's scalable and easy to expand.
The installation process is very simple.
What needs improvement?
Symantec is a better option. Kaspersky needs to strengthen its standing in the market.
It would be ideal if they could make it even easier to use.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for maybe five years at this point.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of the product is great. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
You can scale the solution if you need to. It's not difficult.
We have 15 users on the solution currently.
How are customer service and support?
I've never directly contacted technical support. I cannot speak to how helpful they would be.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We sometimes deal with Symantec or FireEye, depending on the requirements.
How was the initial setup?
The solution is easy to set up. It's not a difficult process. That said, I didn't do the installation myself and therefore cannot speak on how long the deployment took.
What about the implementation team?
Our engineers handled the installation process.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We pay a monthly licensing fee.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend the solution to others. It's been good so far.
I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Last updated: Jan 25, 2022
Flag as inappropriateSystem Administrator at ISJD
Stable and straightforward installation
What is our primary use case?
I use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for security protection for our endpoints for the users.
What needs improvement?
There is a problem with the solution, it came from Russia and we are looking for a replacement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for approximately two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I have found Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response not to be scalable.
We have approximately 700 users using the solution. We do not have plans to increase usage. We are looking to switch solutions.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were using Panda Antivirus previously.
How was the initial setup?
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response's initial installation were straightforward. To installation of the solution on the end-users systems takes 10 minutes. However, from the console, it is a little more time, approximately two days to configure.
What about the implementation team?
We only needed one person for the implementation and support of the solution. We had some support hours from the vendor if needed.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We were on a three-year license to use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. The price could be better.
What other advice do I have?
I would not recommend this solution to others. We are moving to different solutions.
I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Last updated: May 10, 2022
Flag as inappropriateCyber Security Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
It's useful for detecting zero-day attacks but challenging to implement and integrate
What is our primary use case?
Kaspersky is useful for detecting zero-day attacks. It's signature-based and we get regular updates from the cloud.
What is most valuable?
Kaspersky is easy to use, and it performs well.
What needs improvement?
I'd like to see more seamless integration with the cloud and other products as well as improvements to Kaspersky's sandboxing features.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been working with Kaspersky EDR for a few years now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Kaspersky is stable and scalable.
How are customer service and support?
Kaspersky support is good.
How was the initial setup?
Installing Kaspersky is complex. It requires more work from system admins and takes almost one week to deploy, including integration and mapping with other solutions. You also have to configure Kaspersky EDR sandboxing then set up permissions for various teams and customers.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Kaspersky is licensed on a yearly basis.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Kaspersky EDR seven out of ten. I usually recommended other solutions because Kaspersky is more difficult to implement. I only deploy it when the customer requires Kaspersky. But Kaspersky requires more labor from the technical team to install and implement.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Last updated: Jan 9, 2022
Flag as inappropriateSystem Administrator at Finlays
Highly effective, straightforward installation, and support available
What is our primary use case?
We use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for the protection of our system from the internet, firewall, malware, and viruses.
What is most valuable?
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is an effective protection solution.
What needs improvement?
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is very heavy on the system resources. It uses a lot of memory and the system can become slow.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for approximately two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is a scalable solution.
We do not plan to increase usage.
How are customer service and support?
I have not used technical support. The solution is simple to use, they provide the tools that we need. However, the support is readily available if I need them.
How was the initial setup?
The installation of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response was simple and fast. It only takes approximately seven minutes.
What about the implementation team?
I did the implementation myself.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Last updated: May 9, 2022
Flag as inappropriateSecurity and systems engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
A stable and feature-rich addition for network security
What is our primary use case?
We are a solution provider and Kaspersky EDR is one of the products that we implement for our customers as part of their overall security.
What is most valuable?
This is a feature-rich product.
What needs improvement?
There should be options in the UI to better assist with troubleshooting problems that occur during deployment.
I would like to see a more simplified view of the configuration options.
The technical support team should respond in a more timely manner.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have two years of experience with this product.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I have not experienced any bugs or glitches while using it.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support is good. I would say that it is not bad and not excellent, but something in between. I have only opened one case with them and it took a long time for them to respond.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I am currently trying to compare Kaspersky with a similar solution by Carbon Black.
What other advice do I have?
In summary, I think that Kaspersky is a good product to use.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Founder & CEO at CID Infotech
Valuable endpoint protection, stable, but scalability could improve
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is endpoint protection."
- "The solution can improve by providing automatic fixing of vulnerabilities and reducing the resources used in the server component and endpoint agent. They are very bulky and use a lot of CPU, memory, and hard drive resources."
What is our primary use case?
This solution is used for network security.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is endpoint protection.
What needs improvement?
The solution can improve by providing automatic fixing of vulnerabilities and reducing the resources used in the server component and endpoint agent. They are very bulky and use a lot of CPU, memory, and hard drive resources.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for approximately six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I have found this solution not to be scalable.
Our clients that are using this solution are small-sized businesses.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support for this solution is not good. They do not have the availability of resources.
How was the initial setup?
The installation is very easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price of the solution could be reduced.
What other advice do I have?
Those wanting to implement this solution have to understand that fine-tuning and adjusting their policy plan has to be a regular activity.
I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response a seven out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report and find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky, Fortinet, Microsoft, and more!
Updated: June 2022
Product Categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)Popular Comparisons
Trend Micro XDR
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Fortinet FortiEDR
Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
FireEye Endpoint Security
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
Sophos Intercept X
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
Digital Guardian
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response
Fidelis Elevate
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report and find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky, Fortinet, Microsoft, and more!
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What is the difference between EDR and traditional antivirus?
- Which is the best EDR for a logistics company with 500-1000 employees?
- What features are important to look out for when choosing an EDR solution?
- What are the best on-premise Endpoint Security solutions for a Tech Services company with 10,000 employees?
- What are the main differences between XDR and SIEM?
- Carbon Black and Cylance Comparison for EDR
- What to choose: an endpoint antivirus, an EDR solution or both?
- Do we need to use both EDR and Antivirus (AV) solutions for better protection of IT assets?
- What is the best EDR or XDR product for a company with 9000 employees?
- What are the pros and cons of Darktrace vs CrowdStrike Falcon vs alternative EPP solutions?