How has it helped my organization?
What is most valuable?
Guardium is easily integrated with other IBM solutions, a significant advantage and a key reason we chose Guardium. Both platforms share the IBM infrastructure, enhancing compatibility and integration. Additionally, Guardium offers a vulnerability analyzer, which is another compelling feature of the platform.
What needs improvement?
We are currently facing a challenge because it does not offer data encryption by default, only data masking. When we decide to implement data encryption, we must purchase an additional add-on, which incurs extra costs.
Data encryption and data masking often work together in organizations. Therefore, using different products for these functions, such as Oracle for data management and a plugin for data masking, creates a burden on our systems. We have to install and manage multiple agents, like Oracle's light agents and IBM's agents.
IBM should include data encryption in its standard package. This would streamline operations and reduce the complexity and cost of managing separate data protection solutions.
Currently, it supports cross-platform integration but does not support integration with flat file databases. IBM Guardium integrates well with international databases like MySQL and Oracle, making it easy to use with these systems. We need to develop a plugin to integrate flat file databases with Guardium.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using IBM Security Guardium Data Protection for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate the solution’s stability as seven out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable. We have no issues regarding scalability. 50 users are using this solution.
I rate the solution’s scalability a nine out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
Support is very effective. Once we generate a ticket with IBM, they respond very quickly.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
When acquiring a cloud security solution, our primary goal is to ensure robust protection for our organization. Data security becomes critical, especially when considering local vendors and regulatory requirements. We opted to purchase IBM and integrate it with our cloud security measures. We compared Guardium with other products like Oracle and found it superior.
Guardium Data Protection offers more straightforward implementation, policy management, and cost-effectiveness. Current reviews on open-source sites favor Guardium over Oracle for data masking and issue resolution.
How was the initial setup?
Initially, we faced challenges integrating the software we currently run in our organization. With the passage of time and the deployment of more vertices and resources within the organization, we try to overcome challenges, but challenges occur from time to time.
The deployment depends on the type of integration being performed. For example, in our recent data marketing project, we encountered four days of connectivity issues. Typically, connectivity is established within two to three days. We then utilized the SDP functionality in the third-party data, successfully completing the integration. However, on the fourth day, when we started pushing folders, we encountered issues and generated a ticket with IBM. IBM identified a few problems, indicating that the time required for deployment varies based on the product and the specific tasks being performed. Some databases can be integrated within an hour, while others may take four to five days.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price is high because Oracle and other peer products offer lower prices, gaining market share. IBM is the market leader, but they need to reconsider their pricing structure. There is a lot of potential in the public learning market. If IBM offers a more competitive price, it will be better positioned against its competitors.
We are a large organization using IBM. Smaller organizations don't even think about taking IBM because it is an expensive solution.
I rate the product's pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
What other advice do I have?
We are currently in the deployment phase of vulnerability analysis. In two or three months, IBM will be better positioned to provide details about each candidate.
Data Protection is a highly effective product that provides comprehensive security to our organization's servers. One major benefit is its seamless integration with IBM QRadar. Additionally, it easily integrates with our databases and other products, such as our router instances. Overall, it helps create a complete technology stack.
One of its main benefits is integrating with related technologies, forming a robust IBM technology stack. It offers comprehensive integration with databases, including NoSQL databases. IBM provides encryption within a single stack, making it a composite product ready for the market and competitive with other solutions such as Palantir's.
We have a team of around five people responsible for troubleshooting and maintenance. Our information security team includes the database and software teams, which are managed separately. It is part of DBT, which handles database management.
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.