OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Reviews

Name: OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Brand: OpenText
Rating: 3.6 (21 reviews)

Vendor: OpenText

3.6 out of 5

21 reviews
82% willing to recommend

134 followers

Start review

What is OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

Get the OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, GitLab, Snyk and more!

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is the #3 ranked solution in top Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions and #10 ranked solution in top DevSecOps solutions. PeerSpot users give OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing an average rating of 7.2 out of 10. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is most commonly compared to GitLab: OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs GitLab. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 69% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 16% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

June 2025

Get the report

Helped 859,687 peers since 2012

Featured OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reviews

Navin N

Global ISO 27001 Program Lead at DXC Technology

We develop software packages for clients, and these clients are mostly in the BFSI sector. The packages need to be scanned, and we engage Fortify WebInspect for this. Customers typically perform their own application pen tests, but in some cases, we have engagements where customers want us to scan…

Read full review

RaviGupta4

Services Project Lead, Information Technology at IGT Solutions

I would like WebInspect's scanning capability to be quicker. Specifically, being able to scan a particular flow or part of an application more rapidly would be beneficial. Additionally, the cost of the licensing, particularly for multiple user licenses, could be more relevant, which would improve affordability and distribution among users.

Read full review

Kibeom Kim

General Manager at Inexion Co.

The installation phase of the product is slightly complex, making it not so easy. The product does not come in packaging, so one needs to install a database, after which one can install the product by activating the license and updating it whenever required. Fortify WebInspect has many processes involved in its installation phase compared to the other products in the market. Certain Korean products can be installed with just one step. I need to support my customers with the product's installation phase. The installation process takes a day or two to complete, but for some of my customers, it takes a month since they do not have any experience or knowledge about the product. The solution is deployed on-premises.

Read full review

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing mindshare

Product category:

As of July 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category stands at 22.2%, down from 30.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)	Jul 1, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Jul 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs HCL AppScan	Jul 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec	Jul 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti	Jul 1, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
GitLab	4.2	N/A	97%	85 interviews Add to research
Snyk	4.0	N/A	100%	48 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing shines for its Guided Scan option, centralized dashboard, scalability, ease of use, and vulnerability detection. Users appreciate its integration capabilities, accurate scans, detailed reporting, and quick deployment. The tool assists with vulnerability management, allows for scanning with user authentication, and offers a comprehensive bird's eye view of potential threats. Its ability to scan a wide range of file extensions and provide useful settings further enhances its appeal.

"The transaction recorder within WebInspect is easy to use, which is valuable for our team."
"The tool provides comprehensive vulnerability assessments which help ensure our deliverables are as free from vulnerabilities as possible. It has also streamlined our web application vulnerability assessments, assisting us in delivering secure applications to our clients."
"It is easy to use, and its reporting is fairly simple."

Room for Improvement

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing should introduce a cloud-based platform, reduce false positives, and improve scanning speed. Enhancing integration with services like Azure Cloud would benefit users. It is criticized for high resource demands, costly pricing, and cumbersome interface. Improvements in automation, localization, and report generation are needed. Users experience issues with installation, authentication, and scanning of specific file extensions. Greater ease of use and rapid mobile testing are desired enhancements.

"The main area for improvement in Fortify WebInspect is the price, as it is too high compared to the market rate."
"I would like WebInspect's scanning capability to be quicker."
"There are some file extensions, like .SER, that Fortify WebInspect doesn't scan."

ROI

Fortify WebInspect significantly improved security assessment efficiency, leading to faster detection and remediation of vulnerabilities. Users reported enhanced application security, reducing potential costs associated with breaches. Cost savings from automated scans and comprehensive testing exceeded initial investment. Through its detailed analytics, companies experienced better compliance with security standards, ultimately achieving a strong return on investment.

Pricing

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is often considered costly compared to other solutions, with pricing frequently equated to or even higher than competitors like IBM's AppScan and Fortify WebInspect. Enterprise buyers, especially those managing multiple users, find it expensive, though its stability and reliability justify the cost for some. Licensing can be complex, occasionally bundled with other products. Prices may vary depending on specific deals, sometimes challenging smaller clients but more suitable for larger enterprises.

"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."
"This solution is very expensive."
"The price is okay."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations utilize OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing primarily for web application and dynamic application scanning. Security and QA teams employ it for vulnerability detection, network application performance testing, and security testing. It integrates with various environments to assess web applications' states, addresses critical vulnerabilities, and ensures software packages, especially in the BFSI sector, are secure before release. Deployments can be cloud-based or on-premise, facilitating code scanning and application security checks.

Service and Support

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing's support receives mixed feedback. Some find it competent and providing helpful resolutions, while others encounter slow responses and lack prompt remote assistance. Ratings vary, with some scoring support high, noting fast response times, while others express dissatisfaction about responsiveness and interaction delays. Although many users haven't needed direct contact due to internal technical teams, some report successful issue resolution and knowledgeable assistance, despite occasional delays in handling complex tasks.

Deployment

Many users find OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing's initial setup straightforward, with easy downloads and quick deployment. However, some experience complexity, requiring more time, tools, and resources. Installing on-premises or managing updates can be challenging, often needing additional skills and maintenance. While some achieve successful setup within hours, others face extended timelines due to various technical factors and support needs. Opinions differ based on individual experiences and implementation contexts.

Scalability

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is generally considered scalable. Many users find that scaling requires additional licenses or servers, while others face challenges with larger sites or simultaneous scans. Users mention ease of deployment and maintenance and the ability to integrate with other systems. Some rate its scalability between seven and eight out of ten, with good performance for applications, though there may be gaps in addressing security and development needs.

Stability

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is generally stable with some issues. Users encounter scanning errors and resource-heavy CPU utilization, leading to occasional instability, especially with complex websites. False negatives and bug-related issues arise sometimes, particularly with new version releases. Despite these challenges, many rate stability positively, around eight or nine out of ten. It may require improvements for better performance and handling of advanced technology websites.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers

By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Insurance Company

Media Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Performing Arts

Educational Organization

University

Retailer

Consumer Goods Company

Comms Service Provider

Energy/Utilities Company

Construction Company

Hospitality Company

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Wholesaler/Distributor

Transportation Company

Non Profit

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Outsourcing Company

Leisure / Travel Company

Logistics Company

Pharma/Biotech Company

Compare OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing with alternative products

Learn more about OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?

Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect from reviews?

Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing was previously known as Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect.