DigitalOcean Reviews

I primarily use DigitalOcean to deploy applications. I rent the system from them, where I deploy my web servers and application servers. I use it to host my applications since moving from Oracle. It has been serving me well, and I find it cost-effective.

I use only one feature, which is the droplet, and it has been satisfactory. The droplet feature is valuable for hosting my applications as it is particularly cost-effective and serves my needs well. I also have total freedom over what I use, and I have a better user interface and documentation compared to Oracle.

We use DigitalOcean mostly for RDS services and cloud-related systems where we want to deploy codes and run them using nginx or other services where it is cheaper to use, and we use it to extract data. For Linux-related tasks, schedulers are easy to implement, so for those purposes we are using DigitalOcean.

We are using the Droplets feature from DigitalOcean. The Droplets feature is beneficial and easy to use.

We haven't used the DigitalOcean API for workload automation, as we only use the DigitalOcean Droplets feature, which we integrate as virtual machines to deploy and run our tasks.

The features of DigitalOcean are advantageous, as it is cheaper to use compared to others. It also has an easy installation process for obtaining a lab or system. They provide direct and easy access to these resources.

It is easy to integrate with third-party services through the DigitalOcean marketplace. The most significant aspect is that we can connect directly to the system from anywhere.

We worked with DigitalOcean approximately three years ago. We utilized DigitalOcean for providing infrastructure as a service and virtual servers. They also offered a SaaS model, software as a service. These were the types of services we expected on their platform, though we are not focusing on DigitalOcean anymore.

The team was particularly satisfied with the flexibility of the service and the rules for managing virtual machines on DigitalOcean. There were certain restrictions in Microsoft that did not exist in DigitalOcean. This aspect was very important for many customers we were dealing with. Some customers had compliance issues with Microsoft that did not exist in DigitalOcean, which provided more flexibility to use the solution. This was the main reason our team decided to choose DigitalOcean.

It's been a good choice for us for some services. We generally have several deployments. For instance, for some static Angular applications, it was a clear choice to run them on Cloudflare, which performs very well in this context. All the assets go on DigitalOcean.

Additionally, we already have a VPN with our solar farm in Italy. In terms of quality of service, it is fairly good.

We use the cloud platform for software development, including CI/CD implementations.

The platform is straightforward and stable. It offers a reliable cloud service for software development, making it a valuable asset.

I was using DigitalOcean for VMs and Kubernetes clusters because it offers Kubernetes at the cheapest amount with the same data services but with limited services. Other cloud solutions like AWS and Google Cloud provide many ML and AI services.

The user interface is nice, and it is very easy to use. Anyone can use it.

The primary use case is testing employees' awareness of malicious email content.

Employees were made aware of the threats of phishing emails using DigitalOcean has improved our organization by lowering the number of malicious content entering the company's infrastructure.

I am using DigitalOcean for the handling of static files and domains. I use the DNS part to create droplets and develop the backend with OGS.

I don't use the deploy aspect of the application because there is a script running on the system that does it.

The most outstanding aspect of DigitalOcean is its user interface and ease of use. Compared to more complex solutions, such as AWS, DigitalOcean's platform is highly intuitive and user-friendly.